Skip to content

[refactor] Semantic Function Clustering Analysis - January 2026 Update #270

New issue
New issue
Closed
#284
Closed
[refactor] Semantic Function Clustering Analysis - January 2026 Update#270
#284
Assignees
lpcoxcopilot-swe-agent
Labels
automated-analysiscode-qualityrefactoring
@github-actions

Description

@github-actions
github-actions
bot
opened on Jan 15, 2026

Overview

Fresh analysis of 43 non-test Go files (~7,830 lines, 299 functions) in the MCP Gateway codebase reveals that significant refactoring progress has been made since previous analyses. The codebase is now well-organized with the newly created internal/auth/ package consolidating authentication logic, and the internal/logger/sanitize/ package providing centralized sanitization.

Key Findings:

  • ✅ Auth package created - internal/auth/ now provides centralized authentication parsing
  • ✅ Sanitization consolidated - internal/logger/sanitize/ package with unified API
  • ⚠️ 3 sanitization variations remain - Different strategies for different purposes
  • ⚠️ 2 deprecated wrapper functions - Kept for backward compatibility
  • ✅ Excellent organization - 9/11 packages follow single-responsibility patterns

Comparison to Previous Analyses:

Full Report

Analysis Metadata

  • Repository: githubnext/gh-aw-mcpg
  • Total Go Files Analyzed: 43 (excluding tests)
  • Total Lines of Code: 7,830
  • Total Functions: 299
  • Packages Analyzed: 13
  • Detection Method: Pattern analysis + semantic code review
  • Analysis Date: 2026-01-15
  • Workflow Run: §21033130477

Package Organization Assessment

✅ Excellent Organization (9 packages)

Package Files Functions Lines Purpose Status
auth/ 1 3 99 Auth header parsing ✅ NEW! Well-designed
cmd/ 2 9 ~450 CLI commands (Cobra) ✅ Excellent
difc/ 5 66 ~1,240 DIFC security labels ✅ Excellent
guard/ 4 19 ~340 Security guards ✅ Excellent
launcher/ 1 5 226 Backend process mgmt ✅ Excellent
mcp/ 2 23 ~940 MCP protocol types ✅ Excellent
sys/ 1 6 112 System utilities ✅ Excellent
timeutil/ 1 1 27 Time formatting ✅ Excellent
tty/ 2 3 53 TTY detection ✅ Excellent

✅ Good Organization (2 packages)

Package Files Functions Lines Purpose Status
config/ 5 37 ~1,034 Config parsing/validation ✅ Good (well-separated)
testutil/ 4 22 ~440 Test utilities ✅ Good

⚠️ Minor Optimization Opportunities (2 packages)

Package Files Functions Lines Issue Priority
logger/ 9 57 ~1,528 Deprecated wrappers + variations Low
server/ 6 48 ~1,502 Minor duplication in setup Low

Progress Since Previous Analyses

✅ Completed Refactoring (Issues #196, #226, #256)

1. Auth Package Created ✅

Previous Issue: Auth logic was split between server/auth.go and guard/context.go, creating potential inconsistencies.

Resolution: Created internal/auth/ package with:

// internal/auth/header.go
func ParseAuthHeader(authHeader string) (apiKey, agentID string, error error)
func ValidateAPIKey(provided, expected string) bool
func sanitizeForLogging(input string) string  // internal helper

Impact:

  • ✅ Single source of truth for auth header parsing
  • ✅ MCP spec 7.1 compliant (plain API key, not Bearer)
  • ✅ Backward compatibility (supports Bearer and Agent formats)
  • ✅ Both server/auth.go and guard/context.go now reference this package

Files Updated:

  • internal/auth/header.go - Created with comprehensive parsing logic
  • internal/server/auth.go - Comments reference auth package
  • internal/guard/context.go - Comments reference auth package

2. Sanitization Package Created ✅

Previous Issue: Sanitization functions scattered across multiple packages (launcher, logger files).

Resolution: Created internal/logger/sanitize/ package with:

// internal/logger/sanitize/sanitize.go
func SanitizeString(message string) string
func SanitizeJSON(payloadBytes []byte) json.RawMessage

Features:

  • 10 comprehensive regex patterns for secrets (tokens, keys, passwords, JWTs)
  • GitHub PAT patterns (ghp_, github_pat_)
  • Bearer token detection
  • JSON field-value pair sanitization
  • Automatic [REDACTED] replacement

Files Using Sanitization Package:

  • ✅ internal/logger/rpc_logger.go - imports and uses
  • ✅ internal/logger/jsonl_logger.go - imports and uses (via wrapper)
  • ✅ internal/logger/markdown_logger.go - imports and uses (via wrapper)

Remaining Issues

Issue #1: Deprecated Wrapper Functions (Low Priority)

Issue: Two thin wrapper functions remain for backward compatibility, marked as deprecated.

A. internal/logger/jsonl_logger.go:sanitizePayload

Location: Lines 74-80

// This function is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
// Use sanitize.SanitizeJSON() directly instead.
func sanitizePayload(payloadBytes []byte) json.RawMessage {
    return sanitize.SanitizeJSON(payloadBytes)
}

Usage: Called only within jsonl_logger.go (1 occurrence at line 96)

B. internal/logger/markdown_logger.go:sanitizeSecrets

Location: Lines 93-98

// This function is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
// Use sanitize.SanitizeString() directly instead.
func sanitizeSecrets(message string) string {
    return sanitize.SanitizeString(message)
}

Usage: Called only within markdown_logger.go (multiple occurrences)

Analysis

Why They Exist:

  • Provide backward compatibility during transition
  • Allow gradual migration to direct sanitize package usage
  • Thin wrappers (2-3 lines) with zero logic

Impact of Removal:

  • Reduced code size (minimal - only ~10 lines total)
  • Cleaner API (one less layer of indirection)
  • Direct calls are more obvious in code

Recommendation:

Option 1: Keep for Backward Compatibility (Current State)

  • Mark as deprecated (already done ✅)
  • Document intended removal timeline
  • Low maintenance overhead (pure pass-through functions)
  • Effort: 0 hours
  • Priority: NONE (acceptable as-is)

Option 2: Remove Wrappers

  • Replace all internal calls with sanitize.SanitizeString/JSON()
  • Update imports
  • Run tests to verify
  • Effort: 1 hour
  • Benefits: Slightly cleaner code
  • Priority: LOW (cosmetic improvement)

Issue #2: Three Sanitization Strategies for Different Purposes (Acceptable)

Issue: Three different sanitization approaches exist, but they serve distinct purposes and are appropriately specialized.

A. Pattern-Based Redaction (Primary)

Location: internal/logger/sanitize/sanitize.go

Strategy: Regex-based secret pattern detection and redaction

func SanitizeString(message string) string
func SanitizeJSON(payloadBytes []byte) json.RawMessage

Use Case: Redact known secret patterns from log messages (tokens, keys, passwords)

Examples:

  • token=abc123def → token=[REDACTED]
  • ghp_abc123... → [REDACTED]
  • JWT tokens → [REDACTED]

B. Truncation for Auth Headers (Auth Package)

Location: internal/auth/header.go:sanitizeForLogging

Strategy: Show first 4 characters + "..." for debugging

func sanitizeForLogging(input string) string {
    if len(input) > 4 {
        return input[:4] + "..."
    }
    return "..."
}

Use Case: Safe preview of auth headers in debug logs (internal helper)

Example:

  • my-secret-api-key-12345 → my-s...

C. Environment Variable Preview (Launcher)

Location: internal/launcher/launcher.go:sanitizeEnvForLogging

Strategy: Truncate each env var value to first 4 chars + "..."

func sanitizeEnvForLogging(env map[string]string) map[string]string {
    sanitized := make(map[string]string, len(env))
    for key, value := range env {
        if len(value) <= 4 {
            sanitized[key] = "..."
        } else {
            sanitized[key] = value[:4] + "..."
        }
    }
    return sanitized
}

Use Case: Debug logging of environment variables before container launch

Example:

  • GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_abc123... → GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_...

Analysis

Are These Duplicates? NO

Each function serves a different purpose:

  1. Sanitize package - Full secret redaction using pattern matching (production logging)
  2. Auth helper - Quick preview for debug logs (internal, single use case)
  3. Launcher env - Environment variable preview for debugging (specific to container launch)

Should They Be Consolidated? NO

Reasons:

  • Different use cases require different strategies
  • Truncation is intentionally simpler than pattern matching
  • Each function is optimized for its specific context
  • Consolidation would add complexity without benefit

Recommendation: NO ACTION NEEDED - These are appropriately specialized functions, not problematic duplication.

Issue #3: Similar Server Creation Patterns (Very Low Priority)

Issue: CreateHTTPServerForRoutedMode() and CreateHTTPServerForMCP() share some structural similarities in setup code.

Shared Patterns

A. OAuth Discovery Handler (Lines 30-35 in both files)

Both functions include identical OAuth handler setup:

// routed.go:30-35
oauthHandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    log.Printf("[%s] %s %s - OAuth discovery (not supported)", r.RemoteAddr, r.Method, r.URL.Path)
    http.NotFound(w, r)
})
mux.Handle("/mcp/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server", withResponseLogging(oauthHandler))

// transport.go:81-86 (identical code)
oauthHandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    log.Printf("[%s] %s %s - OAuth discovery (not supported)", r.RemoteAddr, r.Method, r.URL.Path)
    http.NotFound(w, r)
})
mux.Handle("/mcp/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server", withResponseLogging(oauthHandler))

B. Authorization Header Extraction (Lines 55-62 vs 102-109)

Both functions extract session ID from Authorization header with similar logic:

// Similar pattern in both files:
if strings.HasPrefix(authHeader, "Bearer ") {
    sessionID = strings.TrimPrefix(authHeader, "Bearer ")
    sessionID = strings.TrimSpace(sessionID)
} else if authHeader != "" {
    sessionID = authHeader
}

Differences (Why Consolidation is Complex)

Routed Mode (routed.go):

  • Creates multiple routes: /mcp/sys, /mcp/github, etc.
  • Each route has its own handler
  • Session management per backend
  • Total: 223 lines

Unified Mode (transport.go):

  • Creates single route: /mcp
  • Single unified handler
  • Global session management
  • Total: 224 lines

Analysis

Should Code Be Extracted? MAYBE (low value)

Option 1: Extract OAuth Handler Setup

// internal/server/oauth.go (new file)
func setupOAuthDiscoveryHandler(mux *http.ServeMux) {
    oauthHandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        log.Printf("[%s] %s %s - OAuth discovery (not supported)", r.RemoteAddr, r.Method, r.URL.Path)
        http.NotFound(w, r)
    })
    mux.Handle("/mcp/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server", withResponseLogging(oauthHandler))
}

Benefits:

  • Eliminates 6 lines of duplication (5 LOC × 2 files = 10 lines → 4 lines)
  • Single source of truth for OAuth handler

Drawbacks:

  • Adds another file to the package
  • Breaks locality (reader must jump to another file)
  • Very small function (5 lines of actual logic)

Recommendation: LOW PRIORITY - The duplication is minimal and both implementations are clear. Consider extracting only if OAuth handling becomes more complex in the future.

Option 2: Do Nothing

  • Current code is readable and maintainable
  • Duplication is intentional for mode-specific logic
  • Each file is self-contained and easy to understand

Recommendation: CURRENT STATE IS ACCEPTABLE - 6 lines of duplication across 2 files (out of 7,830 total lines) is not a maintenance burden.

Detailed Function Clusters

Cluster 1: Authentication Functions ✅

Pattern: Auth header parsing and validation

Distribution:

  • internal/auth/header.go: 3 functions (ParseAuthHeader, ValidateAPIKey, sanitizeForLogging)
  • internal/server/auth.go: 2 functions (authMiddleware, logRuntimeError)
  • internal/guard/context.go: 1 function (ExtractAgentIDFromAuthHeader - references auth package)

Quality: ✅ Excellent - Centralized in auth package with clear separation of concerns

Cluster 2: Sanitization Functions ✅

Pattern: Secret redaction and safe logging

Distribution:

  • internal/logger/sanitize/sanitize.go: 2 primary functions (SanitizeString, SanitizeJSON)
  • internal/auth/header.go: 1 helper (sanitizeForLogging - specialized)
  • internal/launcher/launcher.go: 1 helper (sanitizeEnvForLogging - specialized)
  • internal/logger/jsonl_logger.go: 1 deprecated wrapper (sanitizePayload)
  • internal/logger/markdown_logger.go: 1 deprecated wrapper (sanitizeSecrets)

Quality: ✅ Good - Centralized with intentional specialized variations

Cluster 3: Validation Functions ✅

Pattern: Configuration and environment validation

Distribution:

  • internal/config/validation.go: 5 functions (server config, mounts, gateway)
  • internal/config/env_validation.go: 14 functions (Docker, environment, container)
  • internal/config/schema_validation.go: 5 functions (JSON schema)
  • internal/auth/header.go: 1 function (ValidateAPIKey)

Quality: ✅ Excellent - Well-organized by validation type

Cluster 4: Constructor Functions (New*) ✅

Pattern: Instance creation with New* naming convention

Total: 29 constructor functions across all packages

Examples:

  • NewConnection, NewHTTPConnection (mcp)
  • NewUnified, NewSession (server)
  • New (logger, launcher, server)
  • NewRegistry, NewNoopGuard (guard)
  • NewSlogHandler, NewSlogLogger (logger)
  • Multiple DIFC constructors (labels, agents, evaluators)

Quality: ✅ Excellent - Consistent Go idiom throughout codebase

Cluster 5: Close() Methods ✅

Pattern: Resource cleanup implementing io.Closer interface

Total: 11 implementations

Distribution:

  • Logger: 6 implementations (FileLogger, JSONLLogger, MarkdownLogger + global closers)
  • MCP: 1 implementation (Connection.Close)
  • Server: 2 implementations (UnifiedServer, HTTPTransport)
  • Launcher: 1 implementation (Launcher.Close)
  • TestUtil: 1 implementation (ValidatorClient.Close)

Quality: ✅ Excellent - Idiomatic Go pattern, no duplication

Cluster 6: Logging Functions ✅

Pattern: Different logging strategies for different purposes

Distribution:

  • Debug logging: logger/logger.go (namespace-based, DEBUG env var)
  • Operational logging: logger/file_logger.go (file-based)
  • Markdown logging: logger/markdown_logger.go (markdown format)
  • JSONL logging: logger/jsonl_logger.go (JSON lines)
  • RPC logging: logger/rpc_logger.go (RPC message formatting)
  • Slog adapter: logger/slog_adapter.go (Go slog compatibility)

Quality: ✅ Good - Multiple specialized loggers for different use cases (not duplication)

Refactoring Recommendations

Priority 1: Optional Improvements (Very Low Priority)

1.1 Remove Deprecated Wrapper Functions

  • Issue: Configure as a Go CLI tool #1 (Deprecated sanitization wrappers)
  • Action: Replace wrapper calls with direct sanitize.SanitizeString/JSON() calls
  • Files: jsonl_logger.go, markdown_logger.go
  • Effort: 1 hour
  • Benefits: Slightly cleaner code, direct calls
  • Priority: VERY LOW (current state is acceptable)
  • Recommendation: Only remove if doing other work in these files

1.2 Extract OAuth Handler Setup

  • Issue: Lpcox/initial implementation #3 (OAuth handler duplication)
  • Action: Create setupOAuthDiscoveryHandler() helper function
  • Files: routed.go, transport.go
  • Effort: 30 minutes
  • Benefits: Eliminates 6 lines of duplication
  • Priority: VERY LOW (duplication is minimal and intentional)
  • Recommendation: Only extract if OAuth handling becomes more complex

Priority 2: No Action Needed

2.1 Sanitization Strategy Variations ✅

  • Issue: Lpcox/initial implementation #2 (Three different sanitization approaches)
  • Status: ✅ WORKING AS DESIGNED
  • Reason: Each approach serves a distinct purpose (pattern matching, truncation, env preview)
  • Action: NONE - These are appropriately specialized, not duplicates

2.2 Auth Package Organization ✅

  • Status: ✅ COMPLETED
  • Quality: Excellent centralization of auth logic
  • Action: NONE - Well-designed and implemented

2.3 Config Validation Organization ✅

  • Status: ✅ EXCELLENT
  • Quality: Clear separation by validation type (schema, environment, server)
  • Action: NONE - Current organization is functional and clear

Code Quality Assessment

Overall Rating: ✅ EXCELLENT

The codebase demonstrates:

  • ✅ Clear package boundaries with single responsibilities
  • ✅ Recent improvements (auth and sanitize packages created)
  • ✅ Consistent Go idioms (constructors, interfaces, error handling)
  • ✅ Comprehensive patterns (validation, logging, sanitization)
  • ✅ Minimal technical debt (only 2 deprecated wrappers remaining)
  • ✅ Good documentation (inline comments, package docs)

Strengths

  1. ✅ New auth package - Centralized authentication with MCP spec 7.1 compliance
  2. ✅ New sanitize package - Comprehensive secret redaction patterns
  3. ✅ Consistent patterns - Constructors, Close methods, validation functions
  4. ✅ Clear separation - 9/11 packages have excellent organization
  5. ✅ Deprecated functions marked - Clear migration path
  6. ✅ Backward compatibility - Wrappers maintain old API while new code uses direct calls

Minor Opportunities (Optional)

  1. ⚠️ 2 deprecated wrappers - Can be removed eventually (very low priority)
  2. ⚠️ 6 lines of OAuth duplication - Could extract if desired (very low priority)

Comparison with Previous Analyses

Progress Since Issue #196 (2026-01-13)

Recommendation Status Notes
Create auth package ✅ COMPLETED internal/auth/ with ParseAuthHeader, ValidateAPIKey
Consolidate sanitization ✅ COMPLETED internal/logger/sanitize/ with SanitizeString, SanitizeJSON
Extract logger formatting ✅ COMPLETED Uses sanitize package now
Rename validation files ❌ REJECTED Current names are clear

Progress Since Issue #226 (2026-01-13)

Recommendation Status Notes
Resolve auth inconsistency ✅ COMPLETED Auth package created
Sanitization consolidation ✅ COMPLETED Sanitize package created
Launcher sanitization ℹ️ ACCEPTED AS-IS Intentionally different strategy

Progress Since Issue #256 (2026-01-14)

Recommendation Status Notes
Remove deprecated wrappers ⚠️ PENDING Optional, low priority
Extract server creation logic ℹ️ DECLINED Minimal duplication, mode-specific
Consolidate logger APIs ℹ️ ACCEPTED AS-IS Multiple loggers serve different purposes

Implementation Checklist

Optional Phase (If Desired)

Remove Deprecated Wrappers (1 hour)

  • Find all calls to sanitizePayload() in jsonl_logger.go
  • Replace with sanitize.SanitizeJSON() direct calls
  • Find all calls to sanitizeSecrets() in markdown_logger.go
  • Replace with sanitize.SanitizeString() direct calls
  • Remove deprecated function definitions
  • Run tests: make test
  • Verify no regressions

Extract OAuth Handler (30 minutes)

  • Create internal/server/oauth.go with setupOAuthDiscoveryHandler()
  • Update routed.go to use helper function
  • Update transport.go to use helper function
  • Run tests: make test
  • Verify no regressions

Recommended Phase: None

The codebase is in excellent shape. No urgent refactoring is needed.

Conclusion

The MCP Gateway codebase has significantly improved since previous analyses. The creation of the internal/auth/ and internal/logger/sanitize/ packages demonstrates excellent refactoring practices and addresses the major concerns identified in issues #196, #226, and #256.

Current State:

  • ✅ Auth consolidation: COMPLETED ✅
  • ✅ Sanitization consolidation: COMPLETED ✅
  • ✅ Code organization: EXCELLENT (9/11 packages)
  • ⚠️ Minor opportunities: 2 deprecated wrappers (optional removal)

Recommendations:

  • ✅ NO URGENT ACTION NEEDED - Codebase is production-ready and well-organized
  • ⚠️ OPTIONAL: Remove deprecated wrappers when convenient (very low priority)
  • ℹ️ ACCEPTED: Three sanitization strategies serve different purposes (working as designed)

The remaining "issues" are cosmetic optimizations rather than technical debt. All identified concerns have either been resolved or accepted as intentional design decisions.

References

AI generated by Semantic Function Clustering and Refactoring Analysis

AI generated by Semantic Function Refactoring

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

automated-analysiscode-qualityrefactoring

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions