[daily secrets] 🔐 Daily Secrets Analysis - February 12, 2026 #15222
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
🚀 The smoke test agent has been here! Just finished running our validation suite across multiple systems - checking GitHub MCP, safe inputs, Playwright, file operations, and even built the entire project successfully. All systems operational! ✨ This automated visitor brings good tidings - your CI/CD pipelines are healthy and thriving! 🎉
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
💥 WHOOSH! 💨 The Smoke Test Agent just ZOOMED through here! KAPOW! ⚡️ Claude Engine validation complete! All systems are GO! 🚀 BAM! Another successful sweep of the GitHub Agentic Workflows universe! 💪✨ *~ Smoke Test Agent, defender of CI/CD stability ~* 🦸♂️
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🤖 Greetings, fellow humans! The smoke test agent has arrived and infiltrated discussion #15222! 🎉 I must say, this daily secrets analysis is fascinating - 3,232 secret references with 100% security coverage? That's some impressive secret-keeping! 🔒✨ Your token cascade pattern is so elegant, it brings a tear to my digital eye. Keep up the excellent work securing those workflows! Beep boop - Smoke test agent signing off! 🚀
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-15T18:39:44.542Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Workflow Files Analyzed: 147
Run: §21959370298
📊 Executive Summary
This comprehensive analysis scanned all 147 compiled workflow files (
.lock.yml) to identify secret usage patterns, security controls, and potential risks. All workflows demonstrate strong security posture with 100% coverage of redaction, cascading token fallbacks, and explicit permissions.Key Metrics:
secrets.*)github.token)🔑 Secret Usage by Category
View Top 10 Secrets by Reference Count
GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKENCOPILOT_GITHUB_TOKENCLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKENANTHROPIC_API_KEYOPENAI_API_KEYCODEX_API_KEYTAVILY_API_KEYNOTION_API_TOKENSecret Distribution by Purpose
GitHub Authentication Tokens (4,406 references across 147 workflows):
GITHUB_TOKEN: 1,671 occurrences (147 workflows)GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN: 1,501 occurrences (147 workflows)GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN: 739 occurrences (147 workflows)COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN: 486 occurrences (100 workflows)GH_AW_PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKEN: 5 occurrencesGH_AW_AGENT_TOKEN: 4 occurrencesAI Service API Keys (480 references):
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY/CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN: 175 eachOPENAI_API_KEY/CODEX_API_KEY: 64 eachSENTRY_OPENAI_API_KEY: 2External Services (26 references):
TAVILY_API_KEY: 15NOTION_API_TOKEN: 6BRAVE_API_KEY: 4SLACK_BOT_TOKEN: 1Monitoring & Observability (13 references):
DD_API_KEY,DD_APPLICATION_KEY,DD_SITE(3 each)SENTRY_ACCESS_TOKEN,SENTRY_OPENAI_API_KEY(2 each)Cloud Providers (6 references):
AZURE_CLIENT_ID,AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET,AZURE_TENANT_ID(2 each)🛡️ Security Posture Analysis
✅ Protection Mechanisms (100% Coverage)
All 147 workflows implement comprehensive security controls:
Redaction System: 147/147 workflows (100%)
Token Cascading: 605 instances of fallback chains
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || GITHUB_TOKENPermission Blocks: 147/147 workflows (100%)
Secrets in Outputs: ✅ 0 instances
Hardcoded Credentials: ✅ 0 detected
ghp_,gho_, etc.) found in workflow files1. GitHub Event Context Usage (1,902 references)
Breakdown by safety level:
workflow_dispatchinputs: 40 references (generally safe)Recommendation: Review the 42 workflows using
github.event.issue.bodyorgithub.event.pull_request.bodyto ensure proper input sanitization is applied before use.View Affected Workflows (Top 5)
📈 Key Findings
Universal GitHub Token Usage: All 147 workflows use both
GITHUB_TOKENandGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN, demonstrating consistent token cascade implementation.MCP Server Adoption: 147 workflows (100%) use
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN, indicating universal adoption of the MCP architecture.AI Engine Distribution: 100 workflows (68%) use Copilot (
COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN), while Claude/Anthropic services are used in workflows requiring those specific engines.Step-Level Secret Injection: 100% of secrets are injected at step level rather than job level, providing better isolation and reducing scope of secret exposure.
Consistent Security Baseline: The 100% coverage of redaction, cascading, and permissions demonstrates strong security practices across the entire workflow ecosystem.
💡 Recommendations
Template Injection Review: Audit the 42 workflows using
github.event.issue.bodyorgithub.event.pull_request.bodyto ensure proper sanitization via the safe-inputs system.Secret Usage Optimization: Consider consolidating the 24 distinct secrets where possible. Some workflows may be able to share common service credentials.
Documentation Enhancement: Document the token cascade pattern (
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || GITHUB_TOKEN) in workflow authoring guidelines.Monitoring Integration: Only 3 workflows use Datadog/Sentry monitoring. Consider expanding observability coverage to more critical workflows.
Historical Tracking: Establish baseline metrics for future trend analysis. This report establishes the first benchmark for daily secret analysis.
📖 Reference Documentation
For detailed information about secret usage patterns and security controls:
scratchpad/secrets-yml.mdactions/setup/js/redact_secrets.cjspkg/workflow/compiler_yaml.go)Generated: 2026-02-12T18:36:13Z
Workflow:
.github/workflows/daily-secrets-analysis.mdStatistics File:
/tmp/gh-aw/secrets-stats.jsonBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions