🏥 Safe Output Health Report - December 19, 2024 #7018
Closed
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
/plan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Plan CreatedI've analyzed the Safe Output Health Report and created a comprehensive plan to address the identified issues: Parent Tracking Issue: Created to coordinate all work related to fixing safe output environment variable propagation issues Sub-Issues Created (5 tasks):
The plan prioritizes the critical bug fix first, then builds supporting infrastructure to prevent similar issues in the future. All issues are now ready for assignment to GitHub Copilot agents or developers.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This report analyzes the health and reliability of safe output jobs across all agentic workflows over the last 24 hours. Safe output jobs handle GitHub API operations like creating discussions, issues, pull requests, and comments based on agent output.
Overall Health: Excellent (95.92% Success Rate)
The safe output system demonstrated very high reliability with only 2 failures out of 49 workflow runs that produced safe outputs.
Full Report Details
Executive Summary
Safe Output Job Statistics
Key Observations
add_comment,add_labels,missing_tool,push_to_pull_request_branch, andnoopall achieved 100% success ratescreate_pull_requesthad a 0% success rate (2 failures out of 2 attempts)add_comment(38 executions) andadd_labels(22 executions) are the most frequently used safe output operationsError Clusters
Cluster 1: Missing GH_AW_WORKFLOW_ID Environment Variable
Error: GH_AW_WORKFLOW_ID environment variable is requiredcreate_pull_requestsecurity-fix-prworkflowSample Error:
Root Cause: The
create_pull_requestsafe output job script requires theGH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDenvironment variable to generate branch names, but this variable is not being passed from the agent job to thesafe_outputsjob in the workflow execution context.Impact:
security-fix-prworkflowRoot Cause Analysis
Configuration Issues
Missing Environment Variable Propagation
The
GH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDenvironment variable is set in the agent job context but is not being properly propagated to thesafe_outputsjob. This suggests a gap in the workflow compilation process where required environment variables for specific safe output operations are not being identified and passed through.Technical Details:
create_pull_requestscript at line 364-366 (see error stack trace)${workflowId}-${randomHex}Recommendations
Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
1. Fix Missing GH_AW_WORKFLOW_ID Environment Variable
GH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDis included in the environment variables passed to thesafe_outputsjobGH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDto the list of required environment variables forcreate_pull_requestsafe output jobscreate_pull_requestsafe output include this variablesecurity-fix-prworkflow, potentially other workflows using create_pull_requestBug Fixes Required
1. Environment Variable Propagation in Workflow Compiler
safe_outputsjobenvsectioncreate_pull_request, but should audit all safe output job typesProcess Improvements
1. Safe Output Job Validation
2. Environment Variable Documentation
3. Test Coverage for Safe Output Jobs
Work Item Plans
Work Item 1: Fix GH_AW_WORKFLOW_ID Propagation
create_pull_requestsafe output job requiresGH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDbut this environment variable is not being passed from the agent job context to the safe_outputs job context, causing all create_pull_request operations to fail.Acceptance Criteria:
GH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDis available in thesafe_outputsjob environmentcreate_pull_requestsafe output jobs succeed insecurity-fix-prworkflowTechnical Approach:
safe_outputsjob definitionGH_AW_WORKFLOW_IDto the environment variables passed to this jobcreate_pull_request(e.g.,security-fix-pr)Estimated Effort: Small (1-2 hours)
Dependencies: Access to workflow compilation codebase
Work Item 2: Create Safe Output Environment Variable Manifest
Acceptance Criteria:
Technical Approach:
Estimated Effort: Medium (4-6 hours)
Dependencies: Completion of Work Item 1
Work Item 3: Add Integration Tests for Safe Output Jobs
Acceptance Criteria:
Technical Approach:
Estimated Effort: Large (1-2 days)
Dependencies: None (can run in parallel with other work items)
Metrics and KPIs
add_comment,add_labels,missing_tool(100% success rate)create_pull_request(0% success rate)Success Rate by Job Type
Historical Context
This is the first audit in the safe output health monitoring system. Future audits will include trend analysis and comparison with previous periods.
Baseline Established
Next Steps
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions