Fix variable shadowing in engine execution command name resolution#10010
Merged
Fix variable shadowing in engine execution command name resolution#10010
Conversation
Co-authored-by: mnkiefer <8320933+mnkiefer@users.noreply.github.com>
…e.go Co-authored-by: mnkiefer <8320933+mnkiefer@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix variable shadowing in engine execution files
Fix variable shadowing in engine execution command name resolution
Jan 15, 2026
Contributor
|
@copilot merge main, format, lint |
…shadowing-error # Conflicts: # pkg/workflow/codex_engine.go # pkg/workflow/copilot_engine_execution.go
…adowing fix Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
7 tasks
Contributor
|
✨ The prophecy is fulfilled... Smoke Codex has completed its mystical journey. The stars align. 🌟 |
Contributor
|
📰 VERDICT: Smoke Copilot has concluded. All systems operational. This is a developing story. 🎤 |
Contributor
|
🎬 THE END — Smoke Claude MISSION: ACCOMPLISHED! The hero saves the day! ✨ |
Contributor
|
🎉 Yo ho ho! Changeset Generator found the treasure and completed successfully! ⚓💰 |
Contributor
Smoke Test Results (Run #21022512328)Last 2 merged PRs:
Test Results:
Overall Status: PASS (5/6 tests passed)
|
Contributor
Smoke Test Results (Copilot Engine)Last 2 Merged PRs:
Test Results:
Overall Status: PARTIAL PASS (4/5 tests passed) cc @pelikhan
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix Variable Shadowing in Engine Execution Files
This PR fixes variable shadowing violations in
copilot_engine_execution.goandcodex_engine.gothat caused the CI lint-go job to fail.Changes Made:
pkg/workflow/copilot_engine_execution.gocommandNameonce before theif sandboxEnabledblockvar commandName stringdeclarationspkg/workflow/codex_engine.gocommandNameonce before theif firewallEnabledblockvar commandName stringdeclarationsSummary:
The variable shadowing issue has been fixed by:
copilot_engine_execution.go: MovedcommandNamedeclaration before theif sandboxEnabledconditional block, eliminating the duplicate declaration in the else branchcodex_engine.go: Removed duplicatecommandNamedeclaration in the non-firewall else block, reusing the variable declared earlier in the functionThe linter now passes without shadowing errors. The logic remains identical - only the variable declaration structure changed to avoid shadowing.
Latest update: Successfully merged main branch and resolved conflicts while preserving the variable shadowing fix. Code formatted and linted successfully.
Original prompt
This section details on the original issue you should resolve
<issue_title>[CI Failure Doctor] Variable shadowing in engine execution files causing lint-go failure</issue_title>
<issue_description># 🏥 CI Failure Investigation - Run githubnext/gh-aw#21012377690
Summary
The CI workflow failed due to variable shadowing violations detected by the Go linter in engine execution code. The variable
commandNameis declared multiple times in different scopes within the same function, causing lint-go job to fail.Failure Details
283ab7c9Root Cause Analysis
PR #9987 introduced a new
engine.commandfield to support custom CLI executables. The implementation added logic to determine which command name to use based on whether a custom command was specified. However, the code introduced variable shadowing by declaringvar commandName stringmultiple times in different conditional blocks within the same function scope.Variable Shadowing Locations
File:
pkg/workflow/copilot_engine_execution.goFile:
pkg/workflow/codex_engine.goWhy This Is a Problem
Failed Jobs and Errors
The early failure of lint-go triggered GitHub Actions' fail-fast behavior, cancelling all parallel jobs.
Investigation Findings
Historical Context
This is not the first time variable shadowing has caused lint failures:
Pattern Analysis
The codebase has recurring issues with:
Recommended Actions
Immediate Fix (Priority: HIGH)
copilot_engine_execution.go: DeclarecommandNameonce before theif sandboxEnabledcheckcodex_engine.go: DeclarecommandNameonce before the conditional blocksgetCommandName(workflowData *WorkflowData, defaultCmd string) stringmake lintlocally before committingRefactoring Approach
Prevention Strategies (Priority: MEDIUM)
make lintb...💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.