Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Security Fix: Unhandled Errors in Temporary Directory Cleanup

Alert Numbers: #399, #400, #401, #402, #403, #404
Severity: Low (Warning)
Rule: G104 - Errors unhandled
Tool: gosec (Golang security checks)
Location: pkg/cli/pr_command.go:636, 645, 661, 670, 686, 695, 710

Vulnerability Description

The security scanner detected 7 instances in pkg/cli/pr_command.go where os.RemoveAll(tempDir/workingDir) is called without checking for errors. The G104 rule flags situations where errors from function calls are silently ignored, which can lead to:

  1. Silent failures: Cleanup failures go unnoticed, potentially leaving temporary directories behind
  2. Resource leaks: Uncleaned temporary directories can accumulate over time
  3. Debugging difficulties: Errors during cleanup are not logged, making it harder to diagnose issues
  4. Violation of Go best practices: Error values should never be silently ignored

The unhandled errors were found at:

  • Line 636: When repository clone fails
  • Line 645: When changing directory fails after clone
  • Line 661: When repository clone fails (second location)
  • Line 670: When changing directory fails after clone (second location)
  • Line 686: When repository clone fails (third location)
  • Line 695: When changing directory fails after clone (third location)
  • Line 710: In defer cleanup function

Fix Applied

Added proper error handling for all os.RemoveAll() calls:

Before:

if err := cloneCmd.Run(); err != nil {
    os.RemoveAll(tempDir)
    return fmt.Errorf("failed to clone target repository: %w", err)
}

After:

if err := cloneCmd.Run(); err != nil {
    // Clean up temporary directory on error
    if rmErr := os.RemoveAll(tempDir); rmErr != nil && verbose {
        fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Warning: failed to clean up temporary directory %s: %v\n", tempDir, rmErr)
    }
    return fmt.Errorf("failed to clone target repository: %w", err)
}

This approach:

  • Checks the error returned by os.RemoveAll()
  • Logs a warning message when cleanup fails (in verbose mode)
  • Maintains backward compatibility - cleanup failures don't block the error flow
  • Follows Go best practices for defensive programming

Security Best Practices

  1. Always handle errors: Even in cleanup/error paths, errors should be checked
  2. Consistent error handling: Applied the same pattern used elsewhere in the codebase
  3. Non-critical operations: Since this is cleanup in an error path, we log warnings rather than returning errors
  4. Informative logging: Includes the directory path and error details for debugging

Testing Considerations

  • ✅ Build succeeds without errors
  • ✅ No breaking changes to existing functionality
  • ✅ Error handling is consistent with cleanup operations in other files
  • ✅ Minimal, surgical changes - only added error checking

Impact Assessment

Risk: Minimal
Breaking Changes: None
Backwards Compatibility: Full
Performance: No impact

Files Modified

  • pkg/cli/pr_command.go:
    • Lines 636-665: Added error handling for cleanup after clone failure
    • Lines 645-678: Added error handling for cleanup after chdir failure
    • Lines 661-697: Added error handling for cleanup after clone failure (second location)
    • Lines 670-709: Added error handling for cleanup after chdir failure (second location)
    • Lines 686-697: Added error handling for cleanup after clone failure (third location)
    • Lines 695-709: Added error handling for cleanup after chdir failure (third location)
    • Lines 710-727: Added error handling for cleanup in defer function

References


🤖 Generated by Security Fix Agent in workflow run 20556246680

AI generated by Security Fix PR

…404)

Added proper error handling for all os.RemoveAll() calls in error paths
and defer cleanup function. This fixes 7 unhandled error instances
detected by gosec G104 security scanner.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review December 28, 2025 16:15
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit f13dc67 into main Dec 28, 2025
4 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the main-b9e9ea55c7021d09 branch December 28, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant