Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate gitpod.yml config stored in the DB #9102

Closed
easyCZ opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #12873
Closed

Deprecate gitpod.yml config stored in the DB #9102

easyCZ opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #12873
Assignees
Labels
team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team

Comments

@easyCZ
Copy link
Member

easyCZ commented Apr 4, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

There are currently 3 ways that a gitpod.yml can be injected into a workspace:

  • Repository contains a .gitpod.yml file
  • Project has been configured with a Database level gitpod.yml. This config is stored on the Project level, and not in the repository
  • Using definitely-gp, scheduled for deprecation in Epic: Deprecate definitely-gp  #8473

The existing solution results in inconsistent handling of gitpod.yml definitions. The intention of this change is drive towards a single workflow for defining gitpod.yml specification.

This Issue desribes the what and acts as a tracking issue, the how is yet to be determined.

CC @jldec for filling more details on why and the product take on this.

@easyCZ easyCZ added the team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team label Apr 4, 2022
@jldec jldec moved this to Epic in Progress in 🍎 WebApp Team Apr 4, 2022
@geropl geropl removed the status in 🍎 WebApp Team Apr 5, 2022
@geropl geropl moved this to Needs Design in 🍎 WebApp Team Apr 5, 2022
@jldec jldec removed the status in 🍎 WebApp Team Apr 12, 2022
@jldec
Copy link
Contributor

jldec commented May 13, 2022

Approve - the DB config is hard to control, and too magical.

NOTE: there is a 4th mechanism - auto-inferred gitpod.yml for repos which don't have one. - see PR #7383

Making this less mysterious was discussed also in #6724 (closed)

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 11, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Aug 11, 2022
@jankeromnes jankeromnes moved this to In Progress in 🍎 WebApp Team Sep 12, 2022
@jankeromnes jankeromnes self-assigned this Sep 12, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Sep 12, 2022
Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in 🍎 WebApp Team Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants