-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 933
Let remote.push return a PushInfoList #1360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Byron
merged 8 commits into
gitpython-developers:main
from
Sjord:PushInfoList.raise_on_error
Nov 13, 2021
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
70e4bb8
Let remote.push return a PushInfoList
Sjord 6fc830a
Test that return value of push is a list-like object
Sjord 5c15975
Rename exception to error, raise_on_error to raise_if_error
Sjord 808179e
Test raise_if_error
Sjord e5fd7b7
Add raise_if_error() to tutorial
Sjord 56a395f
Fix type handing on PushInfoList
Sjord bc76d4a
Specify type for PushInfoList.error
Sjord a270deb
Extend IterableList[PushInfo] instead of IterableList
Sjord File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The strange thing is that I would expect
IterableList[PushInfo]
to be the base class, or at least something in this type should indicate thatPushInfo
s are iterated over.That way,
PushInfoList
would be fitting in place ofIterableList[PushInfo]
, which might even be a test to add to assure the type system stays compatible, too.Something like…
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, but I had trouble getting this to work with mypy.
The list with pushinfos was created like this:
I am not sure what the
push_infos
argument is for, but I tried moving it into PushInfoList:However, mypy doesn't agree with this. The types don't match up in
__new__
.super(IterableList[PushInfo], cls)
doesn't work, so now I have a call explicitly toIterableList.__new__
. Is that OK?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"push_infos"
is supposed to be anid_attribute
, which definitely isn't useful here as it is used like this.Maybe @Yobmod can help us clarify if this
.__new__
calling convention to pacify mypi is the expected way, or if there are more idiomatic ways to do this.From my point of view, it's certainly OK even though I can't tell if a future patch release of mypi is going to stop accepting it.