-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
STAC metadata as multidimensional coordinates #230
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
types are so messed up, idk what to do with this, or if it matters
- unnesting is slow. can optimize. - could probably move into inner loop, so we don't have to iterate over values twice - deobjectifying is slowest.
makes surprisingly little difference. even with micro-optimization, this is just slow python. could maybe replace `isinstance` with `type is`; beyond that, idk.
this gets us to just 3x slower (was 4-5x before, with deobjectifying) string fields are now left as objects, mostly because we'd have to scan them to see if any values were missing before `astype('U')`, because otherwise missing values would just be the string `'None'`
tests aren't quite there
@gjoseph92 what is preventing you from merging? Would a deep code review help? I tried going through it quickly, but i's too far in my head and there has been a looot of changes from my initial code but in a good way though. |
@Berhinj simply haven't gotten around to taking another look at it. I wanted to give it a few days before taking another pass at self-review. If you could try out this branch on your use case and confirm it helps, that would be very helpful to get a real-world test! |
@gjoseph92 just tried it and compared to the results I was getting from my PR, the multicoordinnates aspect is working good! Issue though, I notice that the "earthsearch:boa_offset_applied" boolean array from sentinel 2 became float... |
Good point. I should special-case booleans.
I can't reproduce this. I'm getting |
@Berhinj booleans should be handled correctly now; I'm getting |
@gjoseph92 no, that's perfect, thanks |
any chance this will be merged soon? :) |
This refactors the STAC metadata -> xarray coordinates logic to support multi-dimensional coordinates. For example, imagine a field like
rescaling
(orhref
, for that matter), that's different for every asset of every item. Previously, we'd drop this field. Now, we can store it as a 2D array indexing the dimensionstime, band
.This builds off of @Berhinj's work in #222, which provided a lot of inspiration for this design.
This is a significant rewrite of the metadata logic. The basic idea now is, for each field in STAC metadata:
time, band
dimensions)type
field will be an MxN array ofimage/tiff; application=geotiff
over and over; this is collapsed down into a 0D scalar.Unfortunately, it does come at a slight performance cost:
stackstac.stack
on 10,000 Landast-8 items is 13.6% slower, going from 13.2s to 15s. (Of course, there's no performance difference with actually computing the results, which is where the bulk of time is spent anyway.)There are a number of benefits, however:
roles
field, which contains variable-length lists of tags per band like["data"]
,["cloud", "cloud-shadow"]
, is now stored. Same with complex things likeclassification:bitfields
. More interestingly, we could now easily retaingeometry
,bbox
, etc. xref Store per-item bounding boxes as a coordinate #6raster:bands
subfields are now in coordinates, and supporting extensions likeeo:bands
,raster:bands
, etc. is now generalized and easy to extend in the futurerescale
logic could be simplified into a one-liner after the stack is built (stack * stack.coords['raster:bands_scale'] + stack.coords['raster:bands_offset']
), rather than plumbing scale/offset factors through many layers. (TBD if this makes a nasty Dask graph though.)There's maybe even a future where the logic to generate the Dask array takes these coordinates as input, rather than raw STAC dicts or pystac items? Perhaps if we can someday store the geometries as a GeoSeries, or something like that.
Closes #216