Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure custom element fallback properly specializes statements. #529

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2017

Conversation

rwjblue
Copy link
Member

@rwjblue rwjblue commented May 30, 2017

The root cause of the various implementation missing for: x errors is that the custom element fallback was using unspecialized opcodes that are not used/tested through the rest of the system (since we generally use the specialized versions if at all possible).

This fixes the issue by specializing inside the fallback branch.

A joint @krisselden / @rwjblue production.

Fixes #511
Fixes #494
Fixes #493
Replaces #488

rwjblue added 2 commits May 30, 2017 15:34
The root cause of the various `implementation missing for: x` errors
is that the custom element fallback was using unspecialized opcodes
that are not used/tested through the rest of the system (since we
generally use the specialized versions if at all possible).

This fixes the issue by specializing inside the fallback branch.

A joint @krisselden / @rwjblue production.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants