-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Examples of proposed FHIR structure for Global.HealthxISARIC #205
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@sadiekelly this is where I'm going to be storing the proposed FHIR table structures - just Patient in here at the moment but you get the idea. |
"category" : [ | ||
{ | ||
"coding" : [ | ||
{ | ||
"system" : "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
"code" : "vital-signs", | ||
"display" : "Vital Signs" | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"text" : "Vital Signs" | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"code" : { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add extra context for 'on admission'/'during visit' - timing context.
}, | ||
"period": { | ||
"start": "<enrolment date>" | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can also add actualComparisonGroup (ARM/ARMCD from SDTM) - mainly used to distinguish patients who only had follow up data collected rather than hospital data from their initial admission.
We can also link to the Consent resource which can be used where studies explicitly indicate consent was taken
"value" : "", | ||
"assigner" : { | ||
"display" : "" | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we will want to add objective.
result could be used to cite publications arising from the study
{ | ||
"system" : "http://loinc.org", | ||
"code" : "55128-3", | ||
"display" : "Discharge disposition" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm not sure we want to have discharge in both observation and encounter - I'd suggest just encounter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think there's a good way to specifically mention the date of discharge in Encounter? Or is just having a start & end date for the encounter okay?
@pipliggins sorry for the delay - I've added a few comments to some of the examples now. I haven't looked too much at condition as this comes from the SDTM SA domain which I have not yet accessed. |
No description provided.