-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement Profile based configuration #2039
Comments
With a recent discussion it has been identified to simplify this initial implementation to the load of the Config table, involving a simple load/export of key value pairs. Specifically it has been also consider to left out of the implementation:
|
To support a public version of the configuration that describes the loaded profile we would need:
Helps us keep tighter control over nodes that are using a specific type of configuration. Up to user to choose to update to the new current default with a big "RESET DEFAULTS" button. In order to Explain to users the changes to a profile, changelog entries, a paragraph, and maybe even a logo could describe it. All of this could be displayed in the wizard UI. |
An example profile could be Civil Society Activism:
|
Todo
|
@NSkelsey: i've added some revisions on the plan and reordered so that each of the items could be integrated and tested opening the both of us to work on the next steps. I've removed two items that should not be condisered in this topic:
|
Ok, I totally agree on the simplification of the questionnaire in this case. The specification of the context likewise could work. |
This is the basic interface for the feature. There are now two new questions to answer. What are the first profiles we ship and what settings do they flip? |
This ticket is to discuss an collect the requirements fro the implementation of a Profile based configuration.
For what collected so far profiles should:
To be defined is the content of the profiles, that i expect to be preconfigurations of the default settings:
A proper db structure should be discussed and defined in order to host at least the primary requirements and allowing extensions towards the secondary requirements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: