-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dickey2 #2
Dickey2 #2
Conversation
checksums. Along with that, it dropped a comment which seemed to imply that iTerm2 handled both the older/incorrect parameter order and the correct one. This change restores the correct order for xterm.
I thought the mixup of the DECRQCRA args was fixed in patch 315? Your original change to the readme in commit 2b69458 changed it to say:
|
sure - I changed the wording to indicate when it was fixed, but didn't change the logic. It's a double-negative, so if you remove the test, you still need the assignment. |
The spec for DECRQCRA defines it as:
The code with this PR will send Since the value of |
I see the problem now: shortly after applying the fix you sent, I noticed the same issue with DECCKSR, and (incorrectly) undid your fix. So... the option is still needed :-( |
1 similar comment
I see the problem now: shortly after applying the fix you sent, I noticed the same issue with DECCKSR, and (incorrectly) undid your fix. So... the option is still needed :-( |
I'll make an update which detects the xterm patch number to handle the special case, in the next day or so. |
I'll merge this since it will fix the tests for now, and just send another PR once the patch is in. I'd rather not keep the flag around since it adds needless complexity; anyone who is running these tests should use the latest code of whatever terminal they're testing. |
No description provided.