Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
fix(contribs): revert back to
make <action>.<program>
syntax instea…
…d of the opposite (#2353) Please, can we take a bit of care when modifying the syntaxes of our makefile commands? They may not break code, but they break documentation and user flows. We can add a CI check as well; I see this for another PR as this is a hotfix. (Currently, running `make install` / `make install.gnodev` in the top-level directory doesn't work; because @moul inverted these in #1945). This is still not a substitute for a bit of good ol' attention in recognising when something is user-facing and thus should be changed with a bit more care and reason. Note, I'm NOT saying that we should not change things, as we are before any 1.0 so we should change anything that makes sense; but it is a good practice that when changing a flag, command, etc., to do a global search for the old syntax to see examples where old documentation or untested code is broken.
- Loading branch information