Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing args field to gnoclient Call #1616

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor

@leohhhn leohhhn commented Feb 1, 2024

Description

This PR fixes the Gnoclient Call function that left out the MsgCall arguments when parsing, and introduces integration tests to test this.

Contributors' checklist...
  • Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
  • Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is self-explanatory
  • Updated the official documentation or not needed
  • No breaking changes were made, or a BREAKING CHANGE: xxx message was included in the description
  • Added references to related issues and PRs
  • Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
  • Added new benchmarks to generated graphs, if any. More info here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related label Feb 1, 2024
@leohhhn leohhhn marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2024 18:26
@leohhhn leohhhn requested a review from moul as a code owner February 1, 2024 18:26
@leohhhn leohhhn changed the title fix: add missing args field to Call fix: add missing args field to GnoClient Call Feb 1, 2024
@leohhhn leohhhn changed the title fix: add missing args field to GnoClient Call fix: add missing args field to gnoclient Call Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d6f0cde) 56.24% compared to head (adc3cdf) 56.12%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1616      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.24%   56.12%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         425      439      +14     
  Lines       64428    66173    +1745     
==========================================
+ Hits        36237    37139     +902     
- Misses      25369    26140     +771     
- Partials     2822     2894      +72     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-1.21.x ∅ <ø> (∅)
misc ∅ <ø> (∅)
misc-_test.genstd ∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@gfanton gfanton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 👍

@thehowl thehowl merged commit 37c1c31 into gnolang:master Feb 2, 2024
181 of 182 checks passed
@leohhhn leohhhn deleted the fix/gnoclient branch February 2, 2024 11:15
thehowl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
## Description

This PR fixes the Gnoclient Call function that left out the MsgCall
arguments when parsing, and introduces integration tests to test this.

<details><summary>Contributors' checklist...</summary>

- [x] Added new tests, or not needed, or not feasible
- [x] Provided an example (e.g. screenshot) to aid review or the PR is
self-explanatory
- [x] Updated the official documentation or not needed
- [x] No breaking changes were made, or a `BREAKING CHANGE: xxx` message
was included in the description
- [x] Added references to related issues and PRs
- [x] Provided any useful hints for running manual tests
- [ ] Added new benchmarks to [generated
graphs](https://gnoland.github.io/benchmarks), if any. More info
[here](https://github.com/gnolang/gno/blob/master/.benchmarks/README.md).
</details>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related
Projects
Status: Done
Status: Done
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants