Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: proposal for international meetings #37

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
46 changes: 46 additions & 0 deletions docs/communication/international-meetings.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
# International Meeting

To enhance meeting efficiency, we aim to minimize mandatory meetings and prevent scheduling meetings beyond regular working hours.

The first instinct is to avoid meetings and work asynchronously. Then, we can have local meetings.

However, there are times when we need to hold international meetings with multiple participants.
In these cases, it is important to ensure that the meeting takes place under favorable conditions, particularly when there are many participants.

## International Meeting Schedule

Instead of favoring those who speak the loudest, we have a more democratic approach to scheduling international meetings. We suggest the following:

- We reserve the most precious time, 4-7pm CET from Monday to Thursday, for critical international needs.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So are we making official the informal rule of "no meetings on Fridays"? maybe make it explicit with another bullet point.

- We establish a queue of topics and priorities, planning two weeks in advance with leaders.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

beware of endless burocratization with things like these. I would propose more that the topics and priorities agenda is written down in a shared HackMD or Google Docs, and is prioritised by the leader in the 2 days before the call.

the way it is currently written it seems that each team member should write to the leader to propose a topic. I propose a more direct approach of putting agenda items directly (possibly tagged with the proposer's handle/name) so that managing meeting agendas for leaders becomes a 15 minute task before the meeting rather than a constant influx of pings.

- We use a Notion/GitHub page where anyone can propose topics or meetings.
- We hold a weekly top-management meeting to decide the allocation for the next two weeks.
- Exception: we should keep our public meetings regular.
- Anyone, can try using the unallocated slots, but there is a risk that they may be replaced by something else.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would make a note to prefer sharing meeting information asynchronously through minutes, diagrams and notes rather than video recordings and transcripts. and avoid using AI tools when discussing sensitive matters.

it's very hard to play catch-up with meetings by watching full 1-hour sessions. this is a strategy that you already successfully adopted for the gno launch AMA and I think we should continue: write things down, both for those absent and for those present who want to remember what was discussed.

if the leader is not taking notes/minutes themselves, then he should elect someone to do it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for minutes, summaries or diagrams


This system allows us to adapt to changing priorities and ensures everyone has an equal opportunity to get the best slots.

#### Example of cases:

- Currently, AtomOne is a priority and deserves at least a weekly meeting at a convenient international time. Later, it could be held bi-weekly, monthly, or on an ad-hoc basis.
- Some team members are louder, while others are more discreet and consistently get postponed.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ideas:

  • aside from the leader of the call, prefer using hand-raising over interjecting
  • points can be pre-emptively made in chat, but they should always also be re-raised via voice through hand-raising as otherwise the POV risks being sidetracked.


#### Examples of international meetings include:

- Company alignment meetings such as TownHall and AMA.
- Topic brainstorm meetings like Gno Launch, AtomOne, and GOR.
- We also reserve a specific time slot for teams to have parallel meetings. For instance, the weekly GNO core team sync on Monday is an ideal time for other teams to do the same.

## Local Meetings for International Goals

To enhance international collaboration, we suggest rotating meeting times to accommodate various time zones. Here's how it would work:

- Every alternate week, one regional team (Europe, US, Asia) conducts a meeting while the other regions are off duty. The meeting is recorded, transcribed, and a summary is shared.
- The non-participating teams are required to review the content and cannot claim unawareness.
- The following week, another region follows the same process.

In summary, we would have a virtual weekly meeting that lasts only one hour per week. Sometimes we actively participate, while other times we watch and provide comments asynchronously.

It can work with different rhythms, but we must consider the viewing time as mandatory and choose the frequency based on the virtual meeting, not the local one.

This can also be effective for public events.
Loading