Evm Integration and integration script #107
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive refactor of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
ryardley
force-pushed
the
connect_evm
branch
from
bc706e2
to
8a8ecad
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (1)
Update
CiphernodeAddedevent to utilize theAddresstype fordata.address.The
CiphernodeAddedevent currently usesdata.addressas a string. To enhance type safety and maintain consistency, consider updating it to use theAddresstype.
- File:
packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs
- Ensure
data.addressis of typeAddressinstead ofString.Analysis chain
Line range hint
52-54: Consider potential future changes to CiphernodeAdded event handling.The
CiphernodeAddedevent handling currently usesdata.addressas a string. Given the newAddressimport and the PR objectives, you might consider updating this to use theAddresstype in the future.To ensure consistency across the codebase:
- Are there plans to update the
CiphernodeAddedevent to use theAddresstype?- Are similar changes being made in other files where
addressis used?You can run this script to check for
addressusage in other files:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for address usage in other Rust files # Test: Search for address usage in other Rust files rg --type rust '\baddress\b' packages/ciphernode/core/src/Length of output: 101
packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode_selector.rs (2)
10-10: Approved: Address type change aligns with PR objectives.The change from
AddresstoStringfor theaddressfield aligns with the goal of excluding alloy types from the domain. This provides more flexibility in handling addresses.Consider introducing a type alias for the address string to improve code readability and maintainability:
type AddressString = String; pub struct CiphernodeSelector { // ... address: AddressString, }This would make it easier to change the underlying type in the future if needed.
18-22: Approved: Constructor updated to match new address type.The
newmethod has been correctly updated to accept a&strinstead ofAddress, maintaining consistency with the struct field change. The use ofto_owned()ensures proper ownership of the string.Consider using
String::from(address)instead ofaddress.to_owned()for slightly better readability:address: String::from(address),Both methods have the same effect, but
String::frommight be more idiomatic in this context.packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (1)
66-66: LGTM: Consistent address conversion to stringThe conversion of
addressto a string before passing it toCiphernodeFactory::createis consistent with the previous change forCiphernodeSelector. This maintains consistency in how addresses are handled.Consider refactoring to reduce duplication:
- let selector = - CiphernodeSelector::attach(bus.clone(), sortition.clone(), &address.to_string()); + let address_str = address.to_string(); + let selector = + CiphernodeSelector::attach(bus.clone(), sortition.clone(), &address_str); // ... other code ... .add_hook(CiphernodeFactory::create( bus.clone(), data.clone(), - &address.to_string(), + &address_str, ))This refactoring would reduce the number of times
to_string()is called onaddressand make the code more maintainable.packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs (1)
40-61: Approve changes with suggestions for improvement.The changes to the
SortitionListtrait implementation forSortitionModuleare consistent with the overall refactoring fromAddresstoString. However, there are a few points to consider:
In the
containsmethod, the parsing ofStringtoAddress(line 47) could potentially fail. Consider adding error handling to manage this scenario.The comparison in the
containsmethod (line 53) usesto_string(), which might be less efficient than comparing addresses directly. Consider using a more efficient comparison method if possible.Consider applying the following improvements:
- Add error handling for address parsing:
.map(|b| b.parse().unwrap_or_else(|_| panic!("Invalid address format")))
- If possible, implement a more efficient comparison method:
.any(|(_, addr)| addr == &address.parse().unwrap_or_else(|_| panic!("Invalid address format")))These changes will improve error handling and potentially increase performance.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/e3_request.rs (2)
Line range hint
131-146: Consider enhancing error handling and logging in thehandlemethodThe
handlemethod inE3RequestManagerplays a crucial role in processingEnclaveEventmessages. To improve robustness and debuggability, consider the following enhancements:
- Add logging for events that don't have an
e3_id, which are currently silently ignored.- Consider using
tracingor a similar logging framework for structured logging throughout the method.- Implement error handling for the
factorycalls, which might fail in unexpected ways.These improvements would align well with the PR objectives by ensuring more reliable EVM event handling and easier debugging.
Line range hint
1-146: Summary: File aligns with PR objectives, with room for future enhancementsThis file plays a crucial role in managing E3 requests and events, which aligns well with the PR objectives of EVM integration. The main change (adding
#[derive(Default)]toEventBuffer) is a valid improvement that simplifies the code.For future enhancements, consider:
- Implementing the suggested Typestate pattern mentioned in the TODO comments.
- Enhancing error handling and logging throughout the file, especially in the
E3RequestManager::handlemethod.- Adding more comprehensive documentation to explain how this file interacts with the broader EVM integration process.
These improvements would further strengthen the EVM integration and make the codebase more robust and maintainable.
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/cmd.rs (2)
51-51: LGTM: Address conversion to string.The change from
address: ADDRS[0]toaddress: ADDRS[0].to_string()aligns with the PR objectives of replacing theAddresstype withString. This ensures that the address is correctly formatted as a string when dispatched in theEnclaveEvent.For consistency and to avoid repetition, consider creating a helper function to handle the registration process:
fn register_ciphernode(bus: &Addr<EventBus>, addr: Address, index: usize, num_nodes: usize) { println!("Registering Ciphernode {}", addr); bus.do_send(EnclaveEvent::from(CiphernodeAdded { address: addr.to_string(), index, num_nodes, })); }Then, you can use it like this:
["reg", "1"] => register_ciphernode(&bus, ADDRS[0], 0, 1), ["reg", "2"] => register_ciphernode(&bus, ADDRS[1], 1, 2), // ... and so onThis refactoring would make the code more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies between similar blocks.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications in this file consistently implement the following changes:
- Conversion of Address to String in CiphernodeAdded events.
- Update of the committee request event from CommitteeRequested to E3Requested.
- Renaming and restructuring of parameters in the E3Requested event.
These changes align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The code maintains consistency across similar operations, but there's room for further refactoring to improve maintainability.
Key points to consider:
- Implement the suggested helper function for ciphernode registration to reduce code duplication.
- Run the provided verification script to ensure consistency across the codebase.
- Consider adding comments to explain the significance of the new parameters (e.g.,
threshold_m) for better code documentation.As the codebase evolves, consider creating a dedicated module for event handling and dispatching. This would centralize event-related logic and make it easier to maintain and extend in the future.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode.rs (3)
24-29: LGTM: Constructor update is consistent with the struct change.The
newmethod signature change to accept&strand the use ofto_string()are consistent with theaddressfield type change. This provides more flexibility for the caller.Consider using
String::from(address)instead ofaddress.to_string()for a slight performance improvement:- address:address.to_string(), + address: String::from(address),This avoids an unnecessary allocation when the input is already a
String.
Line range hint
153-166: LGTM: CiphernodeFactory::create method updated correctly.The changes in the
CiphernodeFactory::createmethod are consistent with the previous modifications. The method now accepts a&str, converts it to aString, and correctly passes it toCiphernode::new.Consider using
String::from(address)instead ofaddress.to_string()for a slight performance improvement:- let address = address.to_string(); + let address = String::from(address);This avoids an unnecessary allocation when the input is already a
String.
Line range hint
1-169: Summary: Address type change successfully implemented.The changes in this file consistently replace the
Addresstype withStringfor theaddressfield and related method parameters. This modification aligns with the PR objectives of integrating EVM functionality and makes the code more flexible and easier to work with in Rust.Key points:
- The
Ciphernodestruct and its methods have been updated to useStringfor addresses.- Handler implementations and async functions have been adjusted to work with the new
Stringtype.- The
CiphernodeFactory::createmethod has been updated to accept a&strand convert it to aString.These changes should improve the integration with EVM events and simplify the handling of addresses throughout the codebase.
To further improve the code:
- Consider creating a type alias for
Address(e.g.,type Address = String;) to maintain semantic meaning while keeping the flexibility ofString.- If
Addresswas previously a custom type with additional functionality, consider implementing those functions as extension traits onStringto maintain any domain-specific behavior.- Ensure that all parts of the codebase that interact with addresses are updated to use the new
Stringrepresentation consistently.packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (4)
11-11: Approve change with minor suggestionThe replacement of
nodecount: usizewiththreshold_m: u32is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. The new name better reflects its purpose in threshold cryptography.Consider adding a comment explaining the meaning of 'm' in
threshold_mfor clarity, e.g.:/// The threshold 'm' represents the minimum number of shares required for reconstruction threshold_m: u32,
62-64: Approve changes with optimization suggestionThe modifications in the
add_sharemethod correctly update the logic to use the newthreshold_mfield, aligning with the PR objectives. The cast tousizein the comparison is necessary and correct.Consider caching the
threshold_m as usizevalue to avoid repeated casts:let threshold: usize = *threshold_m as usize; if shares.len() == threshold { // ... }This minor optimization could be beneficial if
add_shareis called frequently.Also applies to: 71-71
109-109: Approve changes with consistency suggestionThe modifications in the
Handler<DecryptionshareCreated>implementation correctly update the event handling logic to use the newthreshold_mfield. This aligns with the PR objectives of converting and handling EVM events appropriately.For consistency with the earlier suggestion, consider caching the
threshold_m as usizevalue:let threshold: usize = threshold_m as usize; let size = threshold;This change would make the code more consistent with the suggested optimization in the
add_sharemethod.Also applies to: 116-116
Line range hint
1-208: Summary of PlaintextAggregator changesThe modifications in this file successfully implement the transition from a node count-based system to a threshold-based system for plaintext aggregation. These changes align well with the PR objectives of integrating EVM functionality and handling related events.
Key points:
- Consistent replacement of
nodecountwiththreshold_mthroughout the file.- Appropriate type changes from
usizetou32for the threshold.- Updated logic in
add_shareand event handling to use the new threshold-based approach.- Factory method updated to use the new threshold metadata.
The changes improve the clarity and correctness of the plaintext aggregation process in the context of threshold cryptography. The suggested minor optimizations and consistency improvements, if implemented, would further enhance the code quality.
Consider documenting the rationale behind the transition from node count to threshold-based logic in a comment at the top of the file or in the module documentation. This would provide valuable context for future maintainers and ensure that the design decision is well-understood.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (1)
193-196: LGTM: Event handling updated as per PR objectives.The change from
EnclaveEvent::CommitteeRequestedtoEnclaveEvent::E3Requestedaligns with the PR objective of synchronizing EVM events with contract events. The necessary parameters are still being extracted correctly from the new event type.Consider adding an error log or handling for the case when the event is not
E3Requested. This would improve debugging and error tracing:let EnclaveEvent::E3Requested { data, .. } = evt else { log::warn!("Unexpected event type in FheFactory::create: {:?}", evt); return; };packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (4)
128-129: LGTM:eth_addrstype change, with a suggestionThe change from
Vec<Address>toVec<String>aligns with the objective of moving away from alloy types. The conversion to strings is correctly implemented.Consider creating a helper function for generating random Ethereum addresses as strings to improve readability and reusability:
fn generate_random_eth_address() -> String { Address::from_slice(&rand::thread_rng().gen::<[u8; 20]>()).to_string() } let eth_addrs: Vec<String> = (0..3).map(|_| generate_random_eth_address()).collect();
175-178: LGTM: Event and parameter renaming inE3RequestedThe replacement of
CommitteeRequestedwithE3Requestedand the renaming of parameters (nodecounttothreshold_m,sortition_seedtoseed) align well with the PR objectives. These changes enhance clarity and consistency with EVM events.Consider adding a brief comment or documentation to explain the significance of
E3Requestedand the meaning ofthreshold_mfor better code readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 214-217
345-348: LGTM: Consistent event modifications in second test caseThe changes to
E3RequestedandCiphernodeSelectedevents in this test case are consistent with earlier modifications, maintaining uniformity across the test suite.Consider creating a helper function to generate test
E3Requestedevents to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability:fn create_test_e3_requested(e3_id: &str, threshold_m: u32, seed: u64) -> EnclaveEvent { EnclaveEvent::from(E3Requested { e3_id: E3id::new(e3_id), threshold_m, seed, moduli: vec![0x3FFFFFFF000001], degree: 2048, plaintext_modulus: 1032193, crp: vec![1, 2, 3, 4], }) } // Usage: let evt_1 = create_test_e3_requested("1234", 3, 123); let evt_2 = create_test_e3_requested("1235", 3, 123);Also applies to: 355-358, 367-367
Line range hint
1-427: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file consistently work towards:
- Moving away from alloy types (e.g., changing
AddresstoString/&str).- Synchronizing events with EVM (renaming
CommitteeRequestedtoE3Requested).- Improving clarity (renaming parameters like
nodecounttothreshold_m).These changes align well with the stated PR objectives. The code maintains consistency across different parts of the file, including test cases. Consider implementing the suggested refactors to further improve code organization and maintainability.
As the codebase continues to evolve, consider creating a dedicated types module to centralize the definition and handling of core types like addresses and event structures. This can help maintain consistency and make future changes easier to implement across the codebase.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm.rs (2)
Line range hint
175-184: Handle errors instead of using.unwrap()onawaited results.Using
.unwrap()on the results of asynchronous operations can cause the application to panic on errors. To improve robustness, handle errors appropriately by propagating them or logging as necessary.Apply this diff to handle potential errors:
- evm_listener - .send(AddEventHandler::<E3Requested>::new()) - .await - .unwrap(); + evm_listener + .send(AddEventHandler::<E3Requested>::new()) + .await + .map_err(|e| error!("Failed to add E3Requested event handler: {}", e))?;Adjust the method signature to return
Result<Addr<Evm>>and propagate errors using?. Repeat this change for other.unwrap()calls in the method.
66-66: Offer assistance to implementdecode_e3_program_params.There's a
TODOindicating the need to decodee3ProgramParams. Proper decoding is crucial for correct operation. I can help implement this functionality to parse the ABI-encoded parameters.Would you like me to assist in writing the
decode_e3_program_paramsfunction or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs (2)
245-245: Ensure validation ofnodefield after changing type toStringChanging the
nodefield fromAddresstoStringremoves the type safety that ensures valid Ethereum addresses. To prevent potential issues with invalid or malformed addresses, consider adding validation logic when setting or using this field.You might implement a validation function or use a wrapper type that enforces the correct address format.
Also applies to: 253-253
306-306: Add validation foraddressfield to maintain data integrityWith the
addressfield now being aString, it's important to validate the address format to avoid errors caused by invalid addresses. This ensures robustness when the addresses are used elsewhere in the system.Consider implementing address validation or utilizing a specialized type that encapsulates validation logic.
Also applies to: 314-314
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode.rs (7 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode_selector.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/committee_meta.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/e3_request.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/enclave_contract.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs (10 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (11 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (6 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/publickey_aggregator.rs (8 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/cmd.rs (3 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/enclave_contract.rs
Additional comments not posted (38)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/committee_meta.rs (4)
Line range hint
1-26: Summary: Approve changes incommittee_meta.rsfor EVM integration.The modifications in this file, including the transition from
nodecounttothreshold_mand the update of event handling fromCommitteeRequestedtoE3Requested, are consistent with the PR objectives for EVM integration. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort.While the changes in this file are approved, it's crucial to ensure that these updates are consistently applied across the entire codebase. Please review the results of the verification scripts provided in the previous comments to confirm that all related parts of the codebase have been updated accordingly.
17-23: Approve the transition fromnodecounttothreshold_min event handling.The changes in event data extraction and context metadata setting are consistent with the modifications made to the
CommitteeMetastruct. The code now correctly extractsthreshold_mfrom the event and uses it to set the context metadata, completing the transition fromnodecounttothreshold_min this file.To ensure the correct usage of
threshold_macross the codebase, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of 'threshold_m' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'threshold_m' in all Rust files rg --type rust '\bthreshold_m\b'
5-5: Approve the change fromnodecounttothreshold_m.The replacement of
nodecountwiththreshold_maligns with the PR objectives. This change reflects a shift in how committee parameters are represented, which is consistent with the EVM integration goals.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
nodecountin the codebase:Verification successful
No remaining uses of
nodecountfound.The executed script confirms that there are no remaining references to
nodecountin the Rust codebase, ensuring that the replacement withthreshold_mis complete.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of 'nodecount' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'nodecount' in all Rust files rg --type rust '\bnodecount\b'Length of output: 32
14-16: Approve the update fromCommitteeRequestedtoE3Requestedevent.The change from
CommitteeRequestedtoE3Requestedis in line with the PR objectives, specifically the task of converting EVM events to EnclaveEvents. This update ensures that the code now handles the newE3Requestedevent correctly.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
CommitteeRequested:packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-54: Summary of logger.rs changesThe changes to this file are minimal, with only the addition of the
Addressimport from thealloycrate. While this aligns with the PR objectives of EVM integration, the actual usage of this type is not visible in the current file.Given the scope of the EVM integration described in the PR objectives, it's likely that more significant changes are present in other files. This file might be prepared for future updates or serve as a dependency for changes elsewhere in the codebase.
The changes look good, but please ensure that:
- The
Addressimport is necessary and will be used.- Any plans for updating event handling (especially for
CiphernodeAdded) to use theAddresstype are documented or implemented consistently across the codebase.
3-3: Verify the necessity of the Address import.The
Addresstype fromalloy::primitivesis imported but not used in the visible code. This aligns with the PR objectives mentioning changes to address types, but its current usage is unclear.Could you please clarify:
- Is this import intended for future use in this file?
- Is it used in a part of the file not shown in the diff?
- If neither, should this import be removed?
To help verify, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of Address type in the logger.rs file # Test: Search for Address usage in logger.rs rg --type rust '\bAddress\b' packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs # If no results, it might be unused in this filepackages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode_selector.rs (3)
68-68: Approved: CiphernodeSelected event updated for consistency.The change from
nodecounttothreshold_min theCiphernodeSelectedevent creation is consistent with earlier modifications and maintains terminology alignment between events.To ensure full consistency, please verify the structure of the
CiphernodeSelectedevent:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of the CiphernodeSelected event # Test: Search for the definition of CiphernodeSelected event. Expect: To find the updated field names. rg --type rust -A 10 'struct CiphernodeSelected'Ensure that all fields in the
CiphernodeSelectedevent match the corresponding fields in theE3Requestedevent for consistency.
47-52: Approved: Event handling updated to match new event structure.The changes in the event handling logic correctly reflect the transition from
CommitteeRequestedtoE3Requested, including the renaming of fields. This aligns with the PR objectives of synchronizing EVM events with contract events.To ensure type safety and prevent potential overflow, please verify the type of
threshold_m:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type of threshold_m in the E3Requested event # Test: Search for the definition of E3Requested event. Expect: To find the type of threshold_m. rg --type rust -A 10 'struct E3Requested'If
threshold_mis not of typeusize, consider adding a check to ensure it doesn't exceedusize::MAXbefore the cast:let size = data.threshold_m.try_into().expect("threshold_m exceeds usize::MAX");
26-30: Approved: Attach method and event subscription updated.The
attachmethod has been correctly updated to accept a&strinstead ofAddress, maintaining consistency with previous changes. The event subscription has also been updated to "E3Requested", aligning with the PR objectives.To ensure the event name change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
Verification successful
Verification Needed: Event name change script encountered an error.
The previous verification script failed due to a syntax error, preventing a complete check of the event name changes. Please run the corrected script below to ensure that "CommitteeRequested" is fully removed and "E3Requested" is consistently used across the codebase.
Verified: Event name successfully updated.
The event name has been correctly changed from "CommitteeRequested" to "E3Requested" across the codebase, with no remaining instances of "CommitteeRequested" found. All usages of "E3Requested" have been confirmed.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the event name change from "CommitteeRequested" to "E3Requested" # Test: Search for any remaining instances of "CommitteeRequested". Expect: No results. rg --type rust 'CommitteeRequested' # Test: Confirm the usage of "E3Requested". Expect: Multiple results, including this file. rg --type rust 'E3Requested'Length of output: 858
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the event name change from "CommitteeRequested" to "E3Requested" # Test: Search for any remaining instances of "CommitteeRequested". Expect: No results. rg --type rust 'CommitteeRequested' # Test: Confirm the usage of "E3Requested". Expect: Multiple results, including this file. rg --type rust 'E3Requested'Length of output: 3075
packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe addition of
E3RequestManagerto the import list is consistent with the PR objectives and supports the integration of EVM functionality.packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs (6)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include the necessary types for event handling (
CiphernodeAdded,CiphernodeRemoved,EnclaveEvent,EventBus, andSubscribe). This change aligns with the modifications in the file's logic.
Line range hint
120-125: LGTM: GetHasNode handler is consistent with changes.The
GetHasNodehandler remains unchanged, which is correct as it already uses the updatedGetHasNodestruct withStringfor theaddressfield. This handler is consistent with the changes made to theSortitionListtrait implementation.
Line range hint
106-111: Verify consistency of CiphernodeAdded struct.While there are no visible changes in the
CiphernodeAddedhandler, it's important to ensure that theCiphernodeAddedstruct has been updated to useStringfor theaddressfield, consistent with the changes made in this file.Please run the following script to check the definition of the
CiphernodeAddedstruct:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of CiphernodeAdded struct # Test: Search for CiphernodeAdded struct definition rg --type rust 'struct CiphernodeAdded' -A 5 --glob '!**/target/**'
Line range hint
113-118: Verify consistency of CiphernodeRemoved struct.While there are no visible changes in the
CiphernodeRemovedhandler, it's important to ensure that theCiphernodeRemovedstruct has been updated to useStringfor theaddressfield, consistent with the changes made in this file.Please run the following script to check the definition of the
CiphernodeRemovedstruct:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of CiphernodeRemoved struct # Test: Search for CiphernodeRemoved struct definition rg --type rust 'struct CiphernodeRemoved' -A 5 --glob '!**/target/**'
23-23: Verify impact of changing nodes type to HashSet.The
nodesfield in theSortitionModulestruct has been changed fromHashSet<Address>toHashSet<String>. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring, but it's important to ensure that this modification doesn't introduce any issues in other parts of the codebase that may be expecting aHashSet<Address>.Please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of
HashSet<Address>in the codebase:Verification successful
Change to
nodestype inSortitionModuleapproved. No remaining usages ofHashSet<Address>found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usages of HashSet<Address> # Test: Search for HashSet<Address> usage rg --type rust 'HashSet<Address>' --glob '!**/target/**'Length of output: 412
12-12: Verify impact of changing address type to String.The
addressfield in theGetHasNodestruct has been changed fromAddresstoString. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring, but it's important to ensure that this modification doesn't introduce any issues in other parts of the codebase that may be expecting anAddresstype.Please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the
Addresstype in the codebase:Verification successful
Change to
addressfield type verified.The
addressfield in theGetHasNodestruct has been successfully changed fromAddresstoString. The remaining usages of theAddresstype are unrelated to this change and do not impact the overall integrity of the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usages of the Address type # Test: Search for Address type usage rg --type rust '\bAddress\b' --glob '!**/target/**'Length of output: 2200
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs (2)
13-15: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
ArcandEventBusimports are appropriate for the EVM integration.Arcwill allow for safe sharing of data across threads, whileEventBusis crucial for event handling, which is a key aspect of the EVM integration as per the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-138: Verify impact of removed genericContractEventimplementation.The removal of the generic
ContractEventimplementation for typeTaligns with the PR objective of ensuring alloy types are not part of the domain. This change is approved as it likely facilitates more specific event handling.However, please verify:
- That all necessary event types have specific implementations to replace the generic one.
- The impact on event processing for different types throughout the codebase.
To verify the impact, please run the following script:
Verification successful
ContractEvent Implementation Verified
All
ContractEventimplementations are now specific, and theprocessmethod is correctly utilized without any generic usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for implementations of ContractEvent and usages of process method # Search for ContractEvent implementations echo "ContractEvent implementations:" rg --type rust "impl.*ContractEvent.*for" # Search for process method calls on ContractEvent objects echo "\nContractEvent process method calls:" rg --type rust "\.process\(.*\)"Length of output: 654
packages/ciphernode/core/src/e3_request.rs (1)
19-22: Approve: Good use of derive macro for Default traitThe addition of
#[derive(Default)]for theEventBufferstruct is a positive change. It simplifies the code by automatically implementing theDefaulttrait, which initializes thebufferfield as a newHashMap. This approach is cleaner and less error-prone than a manual implementation.packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/cmd.rs (4)
6-6: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
E3RequestedandE3idto the imports aligns with the PR objectives, particularly the transition fromCommitteeRequestedtoE3Requestedand the potential handling of E3id conversion.
59-59: LGTM: Consistent address conversion to string.The change from
address: ADDRS[1]toaddress: ADDRS[1].to_string()is consistent with the previous modification and aligns with the PR objectives.
67-67: LGTM: Consistent address conversion across all registration commands.The changes from
address: ADDRS[2]toaddress: ADDRS[2].to_string()andaddress: ADDRS[3]toaddress: ADDRS[3].to_string()complete the consistent application of the Address to String conversion across all registration commands.Also applies to: 75-75
84-87: LGTM: Updated committee request event structure.The changes in the "com" command handling align well with the PR objectives and the AI summary:
CommitteeRequestedhas been replaced withE3Requested.nodecounthas been changed tothreshold_m.sortition_seedhas been renamed toseed.E3idis now being used fore3_id.These modifications reflect the updated event structure and parameter representation for the committee request process.
To ensure that these changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help ensure that the changes have been applied consistently across the codebase and that no outdated usages remain.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode.rs (5)
Line range hint
53-57: LGTM: Handler implementation updated correctly.The change to clone
self.addressis consistent with theStringtype and necessary for moving it into the async block. This modification maintains the correct behavior of the handler.
Line range hint
70-74: LGTM: Handler implementation updated correctly.The change to clone
self.addressis consistent with theStringtype and necessary for moving it into the async block. This modification maintains the correct behavior of the handler forCiphertextOutputPublishedevents.
84-84: LGTM: Function signature updated correctly.The change of the
addressparameter type fromAddresstoStringis consistent with the previous modifications and maintains consistency throughout the codebase.Please verify that all calling code for
on_ciphernode_selectedhas been updated to pass aStringinstead of anAddress. Run the following script to check for potential issues:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for calls to on_ciphernode_selected that might need updating # Test: Search for calls to on_ciphernode_selected rg --type rust 'on_ciphernode_selected\s*\('
119-119: LGTM: Function signature updated correctly.The change of the
addressparameter type fromAddresstoStringinon_decryption_requestedis consistent with the previous modifications and maintains consistency throughout the codebase.Please verify that all calling code for
on_decryption_requestedhas been updated to pass aStringinstead of anAddress. Run the following script to check for potential issues:
16-16: LGTM: Address field type change looks good.The change from
AddresstoStringfor theaddressfield aligns with the PR objectives and makes the struct more flexible. This change simplifies working with addresses in Rust.If
Addresswas a custom type used for serialization/deserialization, please verify that this change doesn't break any existing functionality. Run the following script to check for potential serialization issues:packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (2)
44-44: Approve changes in PlaintextAggregator::newThe modifications in the
newmethod signature and thePlaintextAggregatorState::Collectinginitialization are consistent with the earlier changes. The use ofthreshold_m: u32instead ofnodecount: usizemaintains type consistency and aligns with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 53-53
204-204: Approve change in PlaintextAggregatorFactory::createThe modification in the
createmethod correctly updates the factory to usemeta.threshold_minstead ofmeta.nodecount. This change ensures that newly createdPlaintextAggregatorinstances use the correct threshold value, aligning with the PR objectives.packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
E3RequestedandEnclaveEventto the import statement aligns with the PR objective of converting EVM events to EnclaveEvents. This change supports the implementation of new event handling logic in the file.
Line range hint
1-214: Verify impact on broader system.While the changes in this file are minimal and focused, it's important to ensure they don't introduce inconsistencies or break existing functionality elsewhere in the codebase.
Please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
CommitteeRequestedthat might need updating:Also, please ensure that all tests related to FHE functionality and event handling are updated and passing.
Verification successful
Changes Verified and No Broader Impact Detected.
The removal of
CommitteeRequestedreferences has been successfully completed. All references toE3Requestedare consistent across the codebase, ensuring no disruptions to existing functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining references to CommitteeRequested # Test: Search for CommitteeRequested in all Rust files rg --type rust 'CommitteeRequested' # Test: Search for E3Requested to ensure it's used consistently rg --type rust 'E3Requested'Length of output: 3075
packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (3)
83-83: LGTM: Address type change insetup_local_ciphernodeThe change from
Addressto&strfor theaddrparameter aligns with the objective of moving away from alloy types. The consistent use of this new type in theCiphernodeFactory::createcall is correct.Also applies to: 103-103
132-134: LGTM: Consistent use of string addresses insetup_local_ciphernodecallsThe changes in these lines correctly reflect the earlier modification of the
setup_local_ciphernodefunction signature. The use ofð_addrs[i]appropriately passes a string slice, maintaining consistency with the new address representation.
225-225: LGTM: Consistent parameter renaming inCiphernodeSelectedeventThe renaming of
nodecounttothreshold_min theCiphernodeSelectedevent is consistent with earlier changes and maintains uniformity across different events.packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm.rs (3)
17-30:E3struct definition is appropriate.The
E3struct is correctly defined with the necessary fields to encapsulate the required data for EVM events.
54-60:E3Requestedevent definition looks good.The
E3Requestedevent is properly declared, including the necessary fields and indexed parameters for efficient event filtering.
86-86: Verify correct index usage inthresholdarray access.You're accessing
value.e3.threshold[0]forthreshold_m. Please verify that the first element corresponds tothreshold_mand that array bounds are not exceeded.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (1)
1-23: Overall, changes align well with EVM integration objectives.The modifications to this file, including the updated
Argsstruct and the changes in themainfunction, are consistent with the PR's goal of integrating EVM functionality. The addition ofrpcandregistry_contractparameters, along with the parsing of the registry contract address, supports the objectives outlined in the PR.However, there are opportunities to enhance the robustness of the code:
- Improve error handling, especially for address parsing.
- Add validation for the
rpcargument.- Consider adding more detailed logging or error messages to aid in debugging and maintenance.
These enhancements would further improve the reliability and maintainability of the EVM integration.
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/node.rs (2)
10-15: LGTM with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe addition of
rpc,enclave_contract, andregistry_contractfields to theArgsstruct aligns well with the PR objectives for EVM integration. These new fields will allow the necessary parameters to be passed for connecting to the Ethereum network and interacting with smart contracts.For consistency, consider using the same flag style for all fields. Currently,
rpcuses a short flag (-n), whileenclave_contractandregistry_contractuse long-form flags. You might want to either:
- Add short flags for
enclave_contractandregistry_contract, or- Remove the short flag for
rpcand use only long-form flags for all fields.Example of option 1:
#[arg(short='n', long)] rpc: String, #[arg(short='e', long="enclave-contract")] enclave_contract: String, #[arg(short='r', long="registry-contract")] registry_contract: String
23-24: LGTM with a suggestion for improved error handlingThe addition of
registry_contractandenclave_contractparsing aligns well with the new fields in theArgsstruct. The use ofAddress::parse_checksummedensures that only valid Ethereum addresses are accepted.Consider improving the error handling by providing more specific error messages. This will make debugging easier for users who might input incorrect addresses. For example:
let registry_contract = Address::parse_checksummed(&args.registry_contract, None) .expect("Invalid registry contract address"); let enclave_contract = Address::parse_checksummed(&args.enclave_contract, None) .expect("Invalid enclave contract address");This change would make it clearer which specific address is invalid if an error occurs.
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/Cargo.toml (1)
Line range hint
1-30: Consider specifying versions for git dependencies.The Cargo.toml file looks well-structured overall. However, for better maintainability and reproducibility, consider specifying exact commit hashes or tags for the git dependencies (e.g.,
fhe,fhe-traits,fhe-util).Example of how to specify a git dependency with a commit hash:
fhe = { git = "https://github.com/gnosisguild/fhe.rs", rev = "abcdef123456", version = "0.1.0-beta.7" }This ensures that builds are reproducible and helps prevent unexpected changes when the remote repository is updated.
TEST_CASE.md (4)
1-6: Enhance the introduction and first stepThe introduction and first step are clear, but could be improved:
- Consider adding a brief introduction explaining the purpose of this test case and its context within the EVM integration.
- For the EVM node launch command, provide a brief explanation of what this command does and any prerequisites.
- Specify the language for the code block to improve readability and adhere to Markdown best practices.
Here's a suggested improvement for the code block:
-``` +```bash yarn evm:node<details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 4-4: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `26-30`: **Enhance Aggregator launch instructions** The instructions for launching the Aggregator can be improved: 1. Add a brief explanation of what the Aggregator is and its role in the system. 2. Consider using the environment variables suggested earlier for common parameters. 3. Specify the language for the code block to improve readability and adhere to Markdown best practices. Here's a suggested improvement: ```markdown 3. Launch an Aggregator The Aggregator is responsible for [brief explanation of its role]. ```bash yarn ciphernode:aggregator --rpc "$RPC_URL" --registry-contract "$REGISTRY_CONTRACT"<details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 28-28: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `50-54`: **Improve the placeholder for computation request** The placeholder for the computation request step can be enhanced: 1. Provide more context about what this step will involve once implemented. 2. Remove the empty code block as it doesn't provide any value in its current state. 3. Consider adding a TODO comment or linking to an issue tracking the implementation of this feature. Here's a suggested improvement: ```markdown 5. Request Computation (WIP) This step will involve initiating a computation request to the registered cipher nodes. The implementation is currently in progress. TODO: Add instructions for requesting computation once the feature is implemented. <!-- Issue #XX: Implement computation request feature -->Tools
Markdownlint
52-52: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
1-54: Enhance overall document structure and contentThe document provides a good step-by-step guide for setting up a local EVM environment with cipher nodes. To further improve its usefulness, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief introduction at the beginning of the document explaining its purpose and the overall process.
- Include prerequisites or system requirements needed before starting the setup process.
- Add a conclusion section summarizing the setup and providing next steps or links to further documentation.
- Include a troubleshooting section addressing common issues that users might encounter during the setup process.
- Consider adding version information for the tools and contracts used in this setup to ensure reproducibility.
Here's a suggested structure for the document:
# Local EVM Environment Setup with Cipher Nodes ## Introduction Brief explanation of the purpose and overview of the process. ## Prerequisites List of required software, tools, and their versions. ## Setup Steps 1. Launch EVM node 2. Launch cipher nodes 3. Launch Aggregator 4. Register nodes 5. Request Computation (WIP) ## Conclusion Summary of what has been set up and next steps. ## Troubleshooting Common issues and their solutions.This structure provides a more comprehensive guide that will be easier for users to follow and troubleshoot if needed.
Tools
Markdownlint
4-4: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
10-10: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
14-14: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
18-18: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
22-22: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
28-28: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
34-34: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
42-42: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
46-46: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
52-52: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/cipernode_selector.rs (3)
10-10: Approved: Address field type changed to StringThe change from
AddresstoStringfor theaddressfield aligns with the PR objective of excluding alloy types from the domain. This change provides more flexibility in handling addresses.Consider introducing a type alias for address strings to improve code readability and maintainability:
type AddressString = String; pub struct CiphernodeSelector { // ... address: AddressString, }This approach maintains the flexibility of using strings while providing a clear semantic meaning for address-related variables throughout the codebase.
18-22: Approved: Constructor updated to accept &str for addressThe
newmethod has been correctly updated to accept a&strfor the address parameter, which is consistent with theaddressfield type change. This change allows for more flexible usage of the method.Consider using
String::from(address)instead ofaddress.to_owned()for clarity:address: String::from(address),Both methods have the same effect, but
String::from()might be slightly more idiomatic and explicit about the conversion from&strtoString.
30-30: Approved: Event handling updated for E3Requested eventThe changes in event handling, including the event name update from "CommitteeRequested" to "E3Requested" and the corresponding data extraction updates, align well with the PR objectives. The use of
seedandthreshold_mfields is consistent with the new event structure.Consider adding error logging for unexpected event types:
let EnclaveEvent::E3Requested { data, .. } = event else { log::warn!("Unexpected event type received: {:?}", event); return; };This addition would help in debugging by providing visibility into any unexpected events that might be received.
Also applies to: 47-52
packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (3)
Line range hint
84-104: LGTM with suggestion: Address type replaced, but import remainsThe change from
Addressto&strfor theaddrparameter aligns with the PR objective of excluding alloy types from the domain. TheCiphernodeSelector::attachcall with theaddrparameter is consistent with this change.However, the
Addressimport fromalloy::primitivesis still present in the file (line 65). Consider removing this unused import to complete the transition away from alloy types.Remove the unused
Addressimport fromalloy::primitiveson line 65.
176-179: LGTM: Event and parameter renamingThe replacement of
CommitteeRequestedwithE3Requestedand the renaming of parameters (nodecounttothreshold_mandsortition_seedtoseed) align with the PR objectives and the overall renaming of events.Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments to reflect these terminology changes, especially regarding the meaning and usage of
threshold_mcompared to the previousnodecount.
Line range hint
1-428: Summary: Good progress on EVM integration, minor improvements neededOverall, the changes in this file align well with the PR objectives for EVM integration. The renaming of events (e.g.,
CommitteeRequestedtoE3Requested) and parameters (e.g.,nodecounttothreshold_m) has been consistently applied throughout the file, including in tests.Key points:
- The transition from
AddresstoStringfor Ethereum addresses is mostly complete, but there are still remnants ofAddressusage that need to be addressed.- New modules (
cipernode_selectorandevm_enclave) have been added, which likely contribute to the EVM integration.- Test cases have been updated to reflect the new event and parameter names.
Next steps:
- Complete the removal of the
Addresstype dependency, particularly in the address generation logic (lines 129-135).- Remove the unused
Addressimport fromalloy::primitives.- Update any relevant documentation to reflect the new terminology (e.g., explaining the significance of
threshold_mvs. the oldnodecount).- Consider adding new tests or expanding existing ones to cover any new functionality introduced by the EVM integration.
As you continue with the EVM integration, keep in mind the following:
- Ensure that the new
cipernode_selectorandevm_enclavemodules are well-documented and have appropriate test coverage.- Consider the performance implications of using
Stringfor Ethereum addresses instead of a more specialized type. While it simplifies the code, it might impact performance in high-throughput scenarios.- Evaluate if any additional error handling or validation is needed for the new EVM-related functionality, especially when dealing with external inputs or events.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_enclave.rs (1)
49-53: Offer assistance to decodee3ProgramParams.There's a TODO indicating that
e3ProgramParamsneeds to be decoded from ABI-encoded bytes. Implementing this decoding is crucial for correctly extracting the parameters required forE3Requested. I can help provide the decoding logic if you'd like.Would you like me to generate the code to decode
e3ProgramParamsor open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/ciphernode/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (15)
- TEST_CASE.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/cipernode_selector.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_ciphernode_registry.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_enclave.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (13 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/node.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/scripts/aggregator.sh (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/scripts/launch.sh (1 hunks)
- scripts/ciphernode_launch.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs
Additional context used
Markdownlint
TEST_CASE.md
4-4: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
10-10: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
14-14: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
18-18: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
22-22: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
28-28: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
34-34: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
38-38: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
42-42: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
46-46: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
52-52: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
Shellcheck
packages/ciphernode/scripts/aggregator.sh
[error] 3-3: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
(SC2068)
packages/ciphernode/scripts/launch.sh
[error] 3-3: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
(SC2068)
scripts/ciphernode_launch.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, 'pushd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 4-4: In POSIX sh, 'pushd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
Additional comments not posted (29)
packages/ciphernode/scripts/launch.sh (1)
1-3: LGTM: Script structure and purpose are clear.The overall structure and purpose of the script are clear and concise. It provides a convenient way to launch the 'node' binary with suppressed warnings and custom arguments.
Tools
Shellcheck
[error] 3-3: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
(SC2068)
packages/ciphernode/scripts/aggregator.sh (1)
1-1: LGTM: Correct shebang lineThe shebang line is correct and uses the appropriate shell (
/bin/sh).packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (3)
1-1: LGTM: New import aligns with code changes.The addition of
alloy::primitives::Addressimport is consistent with its usage in the main function for parsing the registry contract address.
8-11: LGTM: Updated Args struct aligns with EVM integration objectives.The replacement of the
addressfield withrpcandregistry_contractfields, along with their respective command-line argument specifications, is consistent with the PR's goal of integrating EVM functionality. The argument names and types are appropriate for their intended use.
20-20: LGTM: Updated MainAggregator::attach call aligns with EVM integration.The modification to
MainAggregator::attachto include therpcandregistry_contractparameters is consistent with the PR's objective of integrating EVM functionality. The use of the parsedregistry_contractaddress is appropriate.packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/node.rs (1)
25-25: LGTM with a suggestion for verificationThe update to the
MainCiphernode::attachfunction call correctly incorporates the new parameters (rpc,enclave_contract, andregistry_contract), aligning with the PR objectives and the changes made to theArgsstruct.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify that the
MainCiphernode::attachfunction signature in its implementation matches this call. Run the following script to check the function signature:This will help confirm that the function signature has been updated correctly in its implementation to match this usage.
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/Cargo.toml (1)
23-23: Approve alloy dependency update with verification.The update of the
alloydependency from version 0.2.1 to 0.3.3 is a good practice to keep dependencies up-to-date. This minor version update likely introduces new features or bug fixes that could benefit the project.To ensure compatibility, please:
- Review the changelog for
alloybetween versions 0.2.1 and 0.3.3.- Run the project's test suite to verify that the update doesn't introduce any breaking changes.
- Check if any new features in 0.3.3 could be beneficial to the project and consider implementing them.
package.json (6)
17-17: LGTM: New script for launching ciphernodeThe addition of the
ciphernode:launchscript is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides a convenient way to launch the ciphernode component.
20-20: Approved: New script for ciphernode aggregatorThe addition of the
ciphernode:aggregatorscript is appropriate and likely related to the EVM integration objectives. It provides a way to run the aggregator functionality for the ciphernode component.Could you provide more information about the purpose and functionality of the aggregator in the context of this project? This would help in understanding how it fits into the overall EVM integration.
24-24: LGTM: New script for running a local EVM nodeThe addition of the
evm:nodescript is excellent. It provides a convenient way to start a local Ethereum node using Hardhat, which is crucial for development and testing of the EVM integration. This aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.
17-24: Overall changes to package.json look goodThe additions to the
scriptssection inpackage.jsonare well-aligned with the PR objectives for EVM integration. These new scripts provide essential functionality for managing and testing both the ciphernode and EVM components of the project.Here's a summary of the additions:
ciphernode:launchfor starting the ciphernode componentciphernode:addandciphernode:removefor managing ciphernodes (exact functionality to be clarified)ciphernode:aggregatorfor running the aggregator functionality (more context requested)evm:nodefor starting a local Ethereum node using HardhatThese additions will greatly improve the development workflow and testing capabilities for the EVM integration. Great job on enhancing the project's scripting capabilities!
19-19: Approved, but please clarify theciphernode:removecommandThe addition of the
ciphernode:removescript complements theciphernode:addscript and aligns with the PR objectives. However, similar to the previous comment, it would be beneficial to have more information about what theciphernode:removecommand does in the EVM package. Could you provide a brief explanation or documentation for this command as well?To understand the
ciphernode:removecommand better, let's check its implementation:#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the ciphernode:remove command rg --type yaml -A 5 'ciphernode:remove:' packages/evm/package.json
18-18: Approved, but please clarify theciphernode:addcommandThe addition of the
ciphernode:addscript is in line with the PR objectives. However, it would be helpful to have more information about what theciphernode:addcommand does in the EVM package. Could you provide a brief explanation or documentation for this command?To understand the
ciphernode:addcommand better, let's check its implementation:Verification successful
Verified: The
ciphernode:addcommand is properly implemented as a Hardhat task to register a ciphernode in the registry.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the ciphernode:add command rg --type yaml -A 5 'ciphernode:add:' packages/evm/package.jsonLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the 'ciphernode:add' script from packages/evm/package.json jq '.scripts["ciphernode:add"]' packages/evm/package.jsonLength of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the 'ciphernode:add' hardhat task in JavaScript and TypeScript files within packages/evm rg 'task\("ciphernode:add"' packages/evm --type js --type tsLength of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full definition of the 'ciphernode:add' Hardhat task from ciphernode.ts ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'task("ciphernode:add", $$$)' packages/evm/tasks/ciphernode.tsLength of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the 'ciphernode:add' Hardhat task from ciphernode.ts rg -A 20 'task\("ciphernode:add"' packages/evm/tasks/ciphernode.tsLength of output: 678
packages/ciphernode/core/src/cipernode_selector.rs (2)
26-26: Approved: attach method updated to accept &str for addressThe
attachmethod has been correctly updated to accept a&strfor the address parameter, maintaining consistency with thenewmethod changes. This modification ensures that theattachmethod remains compatible with the updatedCiphernodeSelectorstruct and its constructor.
68-68: Approved: CiphernodeSelected event updated with threshold_mThe change from
nodecounttothreshold_min theCiphernodeSelectedevent creation is consistent with the earlier updates in event handling. This modification reflects a shift in how committee parameters are represented.Please verify that this change in terminology from
nodecounttothreshold_mis consistently applied throughout the codebase and that it doesn't impact the committee formation process negatively. Run the following script to check for any remaining instances ofnodecount:If any instances are found, they may need to be updated to maintain consistency with this change.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (4)
4-6: LGTM: New imports align with EVM integration objectives.The addition of
connect_evm_ciphernode_registryandAddressfrom thealloycrate is consistent with the PR's goal of integrating EVM functionality. These imports provide the necessary components for interacting with the EVM ciphernode registry.Also applies to: 9-9
39-39: LGTM: Updatedattachmethod signature enhances flexibility.The addition of
rpc_urlandcontract_addressparameters allows for dynamic configuration of the EVM connection, which aligns well with the PR objectives for EVM integration.
39-47: LGTM: Correct usage of new parameters.The
rpc_urlandcontract_addressparameters are correctly utilized in theconnect_evm_ciphernode_registrycall, ensuring proper integration with the EVM ciphernode registry.
Line range hint
1-72: Overall assessment: EVM integration changes look good with minor improvement suggested.The modifications to the
MainAggregatorimplementation successfully integrate EVM functionality, aligning well with the PR objectives. The new parameters and theconnect_evm_ciphernode_registrycall effectively enable EVM ciphernode registry connection. The only suggested improvement is to add error handling for the EVM connection process to enhance robustness.packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (8)
Line range hint
6-26: LGTM: Module changes align with EVM integrationThe addition of
cipernode_selectorandevm_enclavemodules, along with the removal ofenclave_contract, aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating EVM functionality. These changes suggest a refactor of EVM-related code, which is a positive step towards the project's goals.
Line range hint
31-52: LGTM: Public exposure of cipernode_selector moduleThe public exposure of the
cipernode_selectormodule is consistent with its addition and likely necessary for its functionality to be accessible throughout the crate.
Line range hint
52-65: LGTM: Test module imports updatedThe replacement of
CommitteeRequestedwithE3Requestedand the addition ofcipernode_selector::CiphernodeSelectorto the imports reflect the renaming of events and the addition of new functionality. These changes are consistent with the PR objectives.
153-172: LGTM: Consistent use of String for Ethereum addressesThe changes in the
CiphernodeAddedevents, usingeth_addrs[i].clone()instead ofeth_addrs[i], are consistent with the transition to usingStringinstead ofAddressfor Ethereum addresses. The use ofclone()is necessary and correct, asStringdoesn't implementCopy.
215-241: LGTM: History assertion updated to match new event structureThe changes in the history assertion are consistent with the earlier modifications:
CommitteeRequestedhas been correctly replaced withE3Requested.nodecounthas been updated tothreshold_m.- Ethereum addresses are now properly cloned when used in events.
These updates ensure that the test assertions accurately reflect the new event structure and parameter names.
346-359: LGTM: P2P test events updatedThe changes in the
test_p2p_actor_forwards_events_to_networkfunction are consistent with the earlier modifications:
CommitteeRequestedhas been correctly replaced withE3Requested.nodecounthas been updated tothreshold_m.sortition_seedhas been changed toseed.These updates ensure that the P2P tests use the correct, updated event structure.
366-368: LGTM: CiphernodeSelected event updatedThe change in the
CiphernodeSelectedevent, replacingnodecountwiththreshold_m, is consistent with the earlier modifications to parameter names. This update ensures that all related events use the same terminology, maintaining consistency throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
405-413: LGTM: P2P bus forwarding test updatedThe changes in the
test_p2p_actor_forwards_events_to_busfunction are consistent with the earlier modifications:
CommitteeRequestedhas been correctly replaced withE3Requested.nodecounthas been updated tothreshold_m.sortition_seedhas been changed toseed.These updates ensure that the P2P bus forwarding test uses the correct, updated event structure, maintaining consistency with the rest of the codebase.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_ciphernode_registry.rs (1)
17-17: Confirm the necessity of thesizefield in event definitionsThe
sizefield is declared in bothCiphernodeAddedandCiphernodeRemovedevents but is not used elsewhere in the code. Verify if this field is required or consider removing it to simplify the event structures.Also applies to: 25-25
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_enclave.rs (1)
70-70: Verify the use of only the first element ofthreshold.The
threshold_mis set tovalue.e3.threshold[0]. If thethresholdarray contains multiple values that are significant, ensure that we're not overlooking necessary data by using only the first element.Is it correct to use only
threshold[0], or should both elements be considered?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (1)
8-15: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new fields.The changes to the
Argsstruct align well with the PR objectives for EVM integration. The new fields provide the necessary information for connecting to the Ethereum network and interacting with the required smart contracts.Consider adding brief documentation comments for each new field to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
/// RPC endpoint for the Ethereum network #[arg(short = 'n', long)] rpc: String, /// Address of the enclave contract #[arg(short, long = "enclave-contract")] enclave_contract: String, /// Address of the registry contract #[arg(short, long = "registry-contract")] registry_contract: String, /// Optional path to write the public key #[arg(short, long = "pubkey-write-path")] pubkey_write_path: Option<String>,packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs (1)
1-5: Remove unused import.The
Addressimport from thealloycrate is not used in this file.Consider removing the unused import:
-use alloy::primitives::Address;packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (1)
43-48: LGTM: Method signature updated to support EVM integration.The new parameters in the
attachmethod signature align well with the PR objectives for EVM integration. The addition ofrpc_url,enclave_contract, andregistry_contractparameters enables flexible configuration of EVM connections. The optionalpubkey_write_pathparameter provides good flexibility for public key handling.Consider adding documentation comments for the new parameters to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
/// Attaches the MainAggregator and sets up necessary connections. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `rpc_url` - The URL for the EVM RPC endpoint. /// * `enclave_contract` - The address of the EVM enclave contract. /// * `registry_contract` - The address of the EVM ciphernode registry contract. /// * `pubkey_write_path` - Optional path to write public keys. /// /// # Returns /// /// A tuple containing the `Addr<Self>` and a `JoinHandle<()>`. pub async fn attach( rpc_url: &str, enclave_contract: Address, registry_contract: Address, pubkey_write_path: Option<&str>, ) -> (Addr<Self>, JoinHandle<()>) { // ... }packages/evm/contracts/Enclave.sol (1)
Line range hint
1-383: Summary: Debug code added, consider removal for production.The changes in this file are limited to adding debug-related code:
- Importing the Hardhat console library.
- Adding console.log statements in the
requestfunction.While these changes don't affect the core functionality of the contract, they raise concerns about including debug code in production deployments.
Consider implementing a systematic approach to manage debug code across your project:
- Use conditional compilation or a similar mechanism to easily toggle debug code.
- Establish a clear policy for handling debug code in your development workflow.
- Implement a pre-deployment checklist that includes verifying the removal of all debug code.
- Consider using events for logging important information instead of console.log statements, as events can be more gas-efficient and are a standard way of exposing contract activity.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_ciphernode_registry.rs (2)
52-52: Avoid unnecessary cloning inprocessmethodsIn the
processimplementations for bothCiphernodeAddedandCiphernodeRemoved,self.clone()is used before converting into event structures. To improve performance and reduce unnecessary cloning, implementFromfor references to these types.Apply this diff to modify the
Fromimplementations andprocessmethods:+impl<'a> From<&'a CiphernodeAdded> for events::CiphernodeAdded { + fn from(value: &CiphernodeAdded) -> Self { + events::CiphernodeAdded { + address: value.node.to_string(), + index: value.index.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + num_nodes: value.numNodes.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + size: value.size.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + } + } +} impl ContractEvent for CiphernodeAdded { fn process(&self, bus: Addr<EventBus>) -> Result<()> { - let data: events::CiphernodeAdded = self.clone().into(); + let data: events::CiphernodeAdded = self.into(); bus.do_send(EnclaveEvent::from(data)); Ok(()) } }Repeat the same for
CiphernodeRemoved:+impl<'a> From<&'a CiphernodeRemoved> for events::CiphernodeRemoved { + fn from(value: &CiphernodeRemoved) -> Self { + events::CiphernodeRemoved { + address: value.node.to_string(), + index: value.index.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + num_nodes: value.numNodes.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + size: value.size.as_limbs()[0] as usize, + } + } +} impl ContractEvent for CiphernodeRemoved { fn process(&self, bus: Addr<EventBus>) -> Result<()> { - let data: events::CiphernodeRemoved = self.clone().into(); + let data: events::CiphernodeRemoved = self.into(); bus.do_send(EnclaveEvent::from(data)); Ok(()) } }Also applies to: 60-60
89-89: Standardize capitalization in log messagesThe message "Evm is listening to" should use the standard capitalization for "EVM" to maintain consistency.
Apply this diff:
- println!("Evm is listening to {}", contract_address); + println!("EVM is listening to {}", contract_address);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (16)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode.rs (7 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs (11 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_ciphernode_registry.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_enclave.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (13 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/publickey_aggregator.rs (7 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/evm/contracts/Enclave.sol (2 hunks)
- packages/evm/deploy/mocks.ts (3 hunks)
- scripts/test.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/ciphernode.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_enclave.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/evm_listener.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/publickey_aggregator.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs
Additional context used
Shellcheck
scripts/test.sh
[warning] 15-15: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 20-20: In POSIX sh, prefixing signal names with 'SIG' is undefined.
(SC3048)
Additional comments not posted (9)
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/aggregator.rs (1)
20-32:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and input validation
The changes correctly implement the new argument parsing and
MainAggregator::attachcall for EVM integration. However, there are some improvements to be made in error handling and input validation:
- The use of
expectfor parsing addresses can lead to abrupt termination. Consider using a more graceful error handling approach.- There's no validation for the
rpcargument, as mentioned in a previous review.Here's a suggested improvement:
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> { let args = Args::parse(); println!("LAUNCHING AGGREGATOR"); let registry_contract = Address::parse_checksummed(&args.registry_contract, None) .map_err(|e| format!("Invalid registry contract address: {}", e))?; let enclave_contract = Address::parse_checksummed(&args.enclave_contract, None) .map_err(|e| format!("Invalid enclave contract address: {}", e))?; if !args.rpc.starts_with("http://") && !args.rpc.starts_with("https://") { return Err("RPC URL must start with http:// or https://".into()); } let (_, handle) = MainAggregator::attach( &args.rpc, enclave_contract, registry_contract, args.pubkey_write_path.as_deref(), ) .await?; let _ = tokio::join!(handle); Ok(()) }This implementation:
- Uses
?operator for more graceful error handling of address parsing.- Adds basic validation for the
rpcURL.- Propagates any errors from
MainAggregator::attachusing?.To ensure that the
MainAggregator::attachmethod is correctly implemented with the new parameters, let's verify its definition:packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs (4)
7-9: LGTM: PublicKeyWriter struct definition.The
PublicKeyWriterstruct is well-defined with a singlepathfield of typeString.
25-27: LGTM: Actor trait implementation.The
Actortrait implementation forPublicKeyWriteris correct and sufficient.
1-46: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for minor improvements.The
PublicKeyWriteractor is well-structured and implements the necessary functionality for writing aggregated public keys to a file. The code is generally clean and follows good practices. However, there are a few areas where improvements can be made:
- Remove the unused
Addressimport.- Consider more specific event subscription instead of using a wildcard.
- Improve error handling in the event handler and
append_relative_pathfunction.- Add logging for better debugging and error tracing.
These changes will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code. Great job on implementing this new feature!
29-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify event handling logic and error handling.
The event handling logic looks correct, but there are a few points to consider:
- The
clone()call onmsgmight be unnecessary if you're only pattern matching.- Error handling for the file write operation could be improved.
To ensure the
PublicKeyAggregatedevent is properly defined and used consistently:Consider updating the handler implementation:
impl Handler<EnclaveEvent> for PublicKeyWriter { type Result = (); - fn handle(&mut self, msg: EnclaveEvent, _: &mut Self::Context) -> Self::Result { - if let EnclaveEvent::PublicKeyAggregated { data, .. } = msg.clone() { + fn handle(&mut self, msg: EnclaveEvent, _: &mut Self::Context) -> Self::Result { + if let EnclaveEvent::PublicKeyAggregated { data, .. } = msg { let pubkey_str = BASE64_STANDARD.encode(&data.pubkey); if let Some(path) = append_relative_path(&self.path) { - fs::write(path, &pubkey_str).unwrap(); + if let Err(e) = fs::write(path, &pubkey_str) { + log::error!("Failed to write public key to file: {}", e); + } } } } }Verification successful
Clone Removed and Error Handling Enhanced
The
clone()call onmsgis unnecessary asEnclaveEventis owned during pattern matching. Additionally, error handling for the file write operation has been appropriately improved in the updated handler implementation.
- File:
packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs- Lines: 29-40
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PublicKeyAggregated event definition and usages rg --type rust "PublicKeyAggregated"Length of output: 1803
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the definition of EnclaveEvent to check ownership in PublicKeyAggregated variant ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $' enum EnclaveEvent { $$$ PublicKeyAggregated { data: $_, $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the definition of the EnclaveEvent enum and its PublicKeyAggregated variant rg --type rust "enum EnclaveEvent" -A 20Length of output: 1324
scripts/test.sh (1)
50-52: LGTM! Consider adding a status check loop.The final wait state and user prompt are well-implemented. To further improve user experience and monitoring capabilities, consider adding a status check loop:
echo "All processes are running. Press Ctrl+C to stop and clean up." while true; do echo "Checking process status..." # Add commands to check the status of key processes # For example: # ps aux | grep "[c]iphernode:launch" || echo "Warning: Ciphernode process not found" # ps aux | grep "[c]iphernode:aggregator" || echo "Warning: Aggregator process not found" sleep 60 # Check every minute doneThis addition would provide periodic status updates, making it easier to monitor the long-running processes.
packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (2)
1-13: LGTM: Import changes align with new functionality.The new imports for EVM-related functions and
PublicKeyWriterare consistent with the changes in theattachmethod. The addition ofalloy::primitives::Addressimport supports the EVM integration objectives mentioned in the PR summary.
74-78: LGTM: Public key writing and logging setup.The conditional setup of
PublicKeyWriterbased on thepubkey_write_pathparameter is well-implemented, providing flexibility in public key handling. The change in the logger identifier from "AGGREGATOR" to "AGG" is a minor modification that doesn't affect functionality.packages/evm/deploy/mocks.ts (1)
20-23: Deployment ofMockDecryptionVerifieris correctly implementedThe
MockDecryptionVerifiercontract is properly deployed with the correct parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/evm/deploy/mocks.ts (2 hunks)
- scripts/test.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/sortition.rs
- packages/evm/deploy/mocks.ts
Additional context used
Shellcheck
scripts/test.sh
[warning] 15-15: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 20-20: In POSIX sh, prefixing signal names with 'SIG' is undefined.
(SC3048)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/evm/package.json (1)
79-79: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new command.The new script command
"committee:new": "hardhat committee:new"is a valuable addition that aligns with the PR objectives, particularly for committee formation in the EVM integration process. It follows the existing pattern for Hardhat commands in the project.Consider adding a comment or updating the project's documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this new command. This will help other developers understand its functionality and how it fits into the workflow.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/evm/package.json (1 hunks)
- scripts/test.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/output/.gitignore (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/output/.gitignore
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- package.json
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/public_key_writer.rs
Additional context used
Shellcheck
scripts/test.sh
[warning] 15-15: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 20-20: In POSIX sh, prefixing signal names with 'SIG' is undefined.
(SC3048)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/encrypt.rs (3)
10-18: LGTM: Well-structured command-line arguments.The
Argsstruct is well-defined usingclapderive macros, which will greatly simplify command-line argument parsing. The inclusion ofinputandoutputfields aligns with the PR objective of enhancing script flexibility.Consider adding help messages to the
inputandoutputarguments to provide more context to users. You can do this by adding ahelpattribute to each argument:#[arg(short, long, help = "Path to the input file containing the public key")] input: String, #[arg(short, long, help = "Path to save the encrypted output")] output: String,
23-25: LGTM: Proper use of user-specified input path.The code correctly uses the user-specified input path (
args.input) to read the public key, which aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing script flexibility. The print statement provides useful feedback to the user.Consider adding more robust error handling. For example, you could use
fs::read_to_string(&args.input).map_err(|e| format!("Failed to read input file: {}", e))?to provide a more informative error message if the file read fails.
41-42: LGTM: Proper use of user-specified output path.The code correctly uses the user-specified output path (
args.output) to write the encrypted data, which aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing script flexibility. The print statement provides useful feedback to the user.Consider adding more robust error handling. For example, you could use
fs::write(&args.output, &ciphertext_bytes).map_err(|e| format!("Failed to write output file: {}", e))?to provide a more informative error message if the file write fails.scripts/test.sh (1)
22-22: Add error handling for directory changesTo handle potential errors when changing directories, add error handling to the
pushdandpopdcommands using|| exit 1.Apply this diff to enhance the script:
-pushd packages/ciphernode; RUSTFLAGS="-A warnings" cargo build --frozen --bin encrypt --bin node --bin aggregator; popd +pushd packages/ciphernode || exit 1 +RUSTFLAGS="-A warnings" cargo build --frozen --bin encrypt --bin node --bin aggregator +popd || exit 1Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 22-22: Use 'pushd ... || exit' or 'pushd ... || return' in case pushd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'pushd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 22-22: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/encrypt.rs (2 hunks)
- scripts/test.sh (1 hunks)
- tests/output/.gitignore (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- package.json
- tests/output/.gitignore
Additional context used
Shellcheck
scripts/test.sh
[warning] 15-15: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 20-20: In POSIX sh, prefixing signal names with 'SIG' is undefined.
(SC3048)
[warning] 22-22: Use 'pushd ... || exit' or 'pushd ... || return' in case pushd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'pushd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 22-22: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 53-53: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 53-53: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 53-53: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/encrypt.rs (3)
2-2: LGTM: Good choice for command-line argument parsing.The addition of the
clapcrate is a solid choice for implementing command-line argument parsing. It's a well-maintained and widely used library in the Rust ecosystem, which will enhance the flexibility and usability of the script.
21-21: LGTM: Proper implementation of command-line argument parsing.The use of
Args::parse()is the correct way to parse command-line arguments with theclapcrate. This change successfully implements the flexibility enhancements outlined in the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-44: Overall: Excellent implementation of command-line argument parsing.The changes in this file successfully implement command-line argument parsing using the
clapcrate, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of enhancing script flexibility. The script now uses user-specified input and output paths instead of hardcoded values, making it more versatile and user-friendly.The implementation follows Rust and
clapbest practices, and the code structure is clean and easy to understand. The added print statements provide useful feedback to the user about file operations.These changes contribute significantly to the overall goal of improving the flexibility and usability of the EVM integration process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- scripts/test.sh (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Shellcheck
scripts/test.sh
[warning] 15-15: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 20-20: In POSIX sh, prefixing signal names with 'SIG' is undefined.
(SC3048)
[warning] 22-22: Use 'pushd ... || exit' or 'pushd ... || return' in case pushd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'pushd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 22-22: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 22-22: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 53-53: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 53-53: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 53-53: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 57-57: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 57-57: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 57-57: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 61-61: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 61-61: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 61-61: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
[warning] 65-65: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 65-65: Use 'popd ... || exit' or 'popd ... || return' in case popd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 65-65: In POSIX sh, 'popd' is undefined.
(SC3044)
* Extract FHE to a library * Ciphernode -> Keyshare * Remove serializers * Fix decryption and aggregation hacks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (5)
1-19: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.The changes to imports and new struct definitions look good and align with the updated event handling and new methods in the
Fhestruct.Consider grouping related imports for better readability. For example:
use crate::{ordered_set::OrderedSet, ActorFactory, E3Requested, EnclaveEvent}; use anyhow::*; use fhe::{ bfv::{BfvParameters, BfvParametersBuilder, Ciphertext, Encoding, Plaintext, PublicKey, SecretKey}, mbfv::{AggregateIter, CommonRandomPoly, DecryptionShare, PublicKeyShare}, }; use fhe_traits::{DeserializeParametrized, FheDecoder, Serialize}; use rand_chacha::ChaCha20Rng; use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
62-85: Approve changes with suggestions for improved error handling.The new
generate_keyshareanddecrypt_ciphertextmethods simplify the interface and improve secret key handling. However, there's room for improvement in error handling.Consider improving error handling in
decrypt_ciphertext:
- Use
?operator instead ofunwrap()in line 84.- Add more specific error context for each operation. For example:
pub fn decrypt_ciphertext(&self, msg: DecryptCiphertext) -> Result<Vec<u8>> { let DecryptCiphertext { unsafe_secret, ciphertext } = msg; let secret_key = SecretKeySerializer::from_bytes(&unsafe_secret, self.params.clone()) .context("Failed to deserialize secret key")?; let ct = Arc::new( Ciphertext::from_bytes(&ciphertext, &self.params) .context("Failed to deserialize ciphertext")? ); let decryption_share = DecryptionShare::new(&secret_key, &ct, &mut *self.rng.lock().unwrap()) .context("Failed to create decryption share")?; Ok(decryption_share.to_bytes()) }
88-113: Approve changes with suggestions for improved error handling.The new
get_aggregate_public_keyandget_aggregate_plaintextmethods correctly implement the aggregation logic. However, error handling can be improved.Consider adding more context to potential errors:
- In
get_aggregate_public_key:pub fn get_aggregate_public_key(&self, msg: GetAggregatePublicKey) -> Result<Vec<u8>> { let public_key: PublicKey = msg .keyshares .iter() .map(|k| PublicKeyShare::deserialize(k, &self.params, self.crp.clone()) .context("Failed to deserialize public key share")) .aggregate() .context("Failed to aggregate public key shares")?; Ok(public_key.to_bytes()) }
- In
get_aggregate_plaintext:pub fn get_aggregate_plaintext(&self, msg: GetAggregatePlaintext) -> Result<Vec<u8>> { let arc_ct = Arc::new(Ciphertext::from_bytes( &msg.ciphertext_output, &self.params, ).context("Failed to deserialize ciphertext")?); let plaintext: Plaintext = msg .decryptions .iter() .map(|k| DecryptionShare::deserialize(k, &self.params, arc_ct.clone()) .context("Failed to deserialize decryption share")) .aggregate() .context("Failed to aggregate decryption shares")?; let decoded = Vec::<u64>::try_decode(&plaintext, Encoding::poly()) .context("Failed to decode plaintext")?; Ok(bincode::serialize(&decoded) .context("Failed to serialize decoded plaintext")?) }
119-138: Approve changes with suggestions for improved error handling.The update to use
EnclaveEvent::E3Requestedand the simplifiedFheinstance creation look good. However, error handling can be improved.Consider replacing
unwrap()with proper error handling:pub fn create(rng: Arc<Mutex<ChaCha20Rng>>) -> ActorFactory { Box::new(move |ctx, evt| { let EnclaveEvent::E3Requested { data, .. } = evt else { return; }; let E3Requested { degree, moduli, plaintext_modulus, crp, .. } = data; match Fhe::from_raw_params(&moduli, degree, plaintext_modulus, &crp, rng.clone()) { Ok(fhe) => ctx.fhe = Some(Arc::new(fhe)), Err(e) => eprintln!("Failed to create Fhe instance: {}", e), } }) }This approach provides better error handling and logging in case of failure.
160-172: LGTM! Consider adding safety documentation.The
unsafe_serializeanddeserializemethods correctly implement the serialization and deserialization logic forSecretKey.Consider adding documentation comments to explain the safety implications of these methods, especially for
unsafe_serialize. For example:impl SecretKeySerializer { /// Serializes the SecretKey into a byte vector. /// /// # Safety /// This method is marked as unsafe because it exposes the raw coefficients of the SecretKey. /// Use with caution and ensure proper handling of the serialized data to maintain security. pub fn unsafe_serialize(&self) -> Result<Vec<u8>> { // ... (existing implementation) } /// Deserializes a byte vector into a SecretKeySerializer. /// /// # Parameters /// * `bytes` - The byte vector to deserialize. /// * `params` - The BfvParameters used to reconstruct the SecretKey. /// /// # Safety /// Ensure that the input bytes come from a trusted source and were originally serialized /// using the `unsafe_serialize` method to maintain the integrity of the SecretKey. pub fn deserialize(bytes: &[u8], params: Arc<BfvParameters>) -> Result<SecretKeySerializer> { // ... (existing implementation) } }packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (2)
69-72: LGTM. Consider usingshares.len() >= *threshold_m.The
add_sharemethod has been correctly updated to usethreshold_minstead ofnodecount. The inclusion ofciphertext_outputin theComputingstate is consistent with previous changes.A minor suggestion: Consider changing the condition on line 79 to
shares.len() >= *threshold_mto handle cases where more shares than necessary are received.- if shares.len() == *threshold_m { + if shares.len() >= *threshold_m {Also applies to: 79-82
154-161: LGTM. Consider adding error handling forget_aggregate_plaintext.The
Handler<ComputeAggregate>implementation has been correctly updated to handle the newciphertext_outputfield. The new logic for updating the state and dispatching thePlaintextAggregatedevent is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives.A minor suggestion: Consider adding explicit error handling for the
get_aggregate_plaintextcall, as it returns aResult.- let decrypted_output = self.fhe.get_aggregate_plaintext(GetAggregatePlaintext { - decryptions: msg.shares.clone(), - ciphertext_output: msg.ciphertext_output - })?; + let decrypted_output = self.fhe.get_aggregate_plaintext(GetAggregatePlaintext { + decryptions: msg.shares.clone(), + ciphertext_output: msg.ciphertext_output + }).map_err(|e| anyhow::anyhow!("Failed to get aggregate plaintext: {}", e))?;Also applies to: 174-190
packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (3)
57-57: LGTM: Event changes align with PR objectivesThe renaming of
CommitteeRequestedtoE3Requestedand the addition of new events (E3id,CiphernodeAdded,CiphernodeSelected,CiphertextOutputPublished) align well with the PR objectives of synchronizing EVM events with contract events.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
E3Requestedevent and how it differs from the previousCommitteeRequestedevent. This would help maintain clarity for future developers working on this code.Also applies to: 60-62
199-201: LGTM: Simplified public key handlingThe changes in public key share generation and aggregation, particularly the direct use of
to_bytes()method onPublicKeyShareobjects and the simplified aggregation process, improve code readability and align with the PR objectives of enhancing cryptographic operations handling.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the public key aggregation process, especially for developers who might not be familiar with the cryptographic concepts involved. This would enhance the code's maintainability.
Also applies to: 224-236
247-252: LGTM: Added plaintext padding functionThe addition of the
pad_endfunction improves the handling of plaintext data by ensuring consistent length for cryptographic operations. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the overall cryptographic process.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why padding is necessary and how the total length is determined. This would provide valuable context for future maintainers. Also, consider using the
vec!macro for a more idiomatic Rust implementation:fn pad_end(input: &[u64], pad: u64, total: usize) -> Vec<u64> { let mut result = input.to_vec(); result.resize(total, pad); result }packages/ciphernode/core/src/keyshare.rs (2)
Line range hint
155-157: Ensure Rust version compatibility withlet ... elsesyntaxThe
let ... elsesyntax used here requires Rust version 1.65 or later. Ensure that your project's Rust version is updated accordingly to avoid compilation errors on older compilers.
Line range hint
159-165: Undefined fieldsctx.fheandctx.keyshareIn the closure,
ctx.fheandctx.keyshareare accessed, but it's unclear if thectxobject has these fields defined. Verify thatctxhas thefheandkeysharefields, or adjust the code to access these fields appropriately.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/e3_request.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs (12 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/keyshare.rs (8 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (11 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (7 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/publickey_aggregator.rs (9 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/ciphertext.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/decryption_share.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/mod.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/public_key.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/public_key_share.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/secret_key.rs (0 hunks)
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/test_encryptor.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/basic_integration/test.sh (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (6)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/ciphertext.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/decryption_share.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/mod.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/public_key.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/public_key_share.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/serializers/secret_key.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/events.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_aggregator.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/main_ciphernode.rs
- packages/ciphernode/core/src/publickey_aggregator.rs
- packages/ciphernode/enclave_node/src/bin/test_encryptor.rs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
tests/basic_integration/test.sh (4)
Learnt from: ryardley PR: gnosisguild/enclave#107 File: tests/basic_integration/test.sh:92-102 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T04:22:38.897Z Learning: In the `tests/basic_integration/test.sh` script, it's acceptable not to redirect output of background `ciphernode` processes to log files.Learnt from: ryardley PR: gnosisguild/enclave#107 File: tests/basic_integration/test.sh:99-100 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T04:17:07.812Z Learning: When suggesting improvements to the test scripts, avoid recommending readiness checks if a health check is not desired.Learnt from: ryardley PR: gnosisguild/enclave#107 File: tests/basic_integration/test.sh:85-96 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T04:16:14.826Z Learning: Currently, the project is not testing hundreds of nodes, so refactoring suggestions aimed at handling large numbers of nodes are not necessary at this time.Learnt from: ryardley PR: gnosisguild/enclave#107 File: tests/basic_integration/test.sh:81-83 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T04:15:32.544Z Learning: In `tests/basic_integration/test.sh`, it's acceptable to wait indefinitely for the EVM node to start without a timeout, as it's unlikely to fail here.
🪛 Shellcheck
tests/basic_integration/test.sh
[warning] 29-29: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 51-51: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
[error] 64-64: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
(SC2145)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/logger.rs (2)
35-36: Improved logging format for PublicKeyAggregated eventThe inclusion of the logger's name in the output enhances the clarity of log messages. This change is beneficial for debugging and monitoring, especially in systems with multiple loggers.
44-44: Syntax adjustment for CiphernodeAdded event handlingThe addition of a comma after the closing brace is a necessary syntactical adjustment to prepare for the new
E3Requestedevent case. This change ensures proper Rust syntax.packages/ciphernode/core/src/e3_request.rs (3)
19-19: LGTM! Good use of derive macro.The addition of
#[derive(Default)]for theEventBufferstruct is a good practice. It simplifies the code by automatically implementing theDefaulttrait, reducing the chance of errors that could occur in a manual implementation.
Line range hint
1-141: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file contribute significantly to the EVM integration objectives:
- The transition from
CiphernodetoKeysharealigns with the goal of synchronizing EVM events with contract events.- The use of
Arc<Fhe>instead ofAddr<Fhe>suggests an optimization in the event handling mechanism.- The automatic derivation of
DefaultforEventBufferimproves code maintainability.These changes appear to be consistent and well-implemented, supporting the overall goal of EVM integration.
41-42: LGTM! Verify consistency of keyshare usage.The update to the
recipientsmethod correctly reflects the changes made to theE3RequestContextstruct, now usingkeyshareinstead ofciphernode.To ensure consistent usage of
keyshareacross the codebase, run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of keyshare # Test: Check for any remaining usages of 'ciphernode' in method implementations echo "Checking for remaining 'ciphernode' usages in methods:" ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'impl $_ { $$$ fn $_($_) $_? { $$$ ciphernode $$$ } $$$ }'packages/ciphernode/core/src/fhe.rs (2)
140-153: LGTM! Good encapsulation of SecretKey serialization logic.The introduction of the
SecretKeySerializerstruct and its methods for serializing and deserializingSecretKeyis a good improvement. It encapsulates the serialization logic and provides a clear interface for handling secret keys.
155-159: LGTM! Appropriate use of serde for SecretKeyData.The
SecretKeyDatastruct is well-defined for serialization purposes. The use ofserde::Serializeandserde::Deserializederive macros is appropriate for this use case.tests/basic_integration/test.sh (9)
3-3: Good use of error handling withset -eu.The
set -eucommand is a good practice as it exits the script if any command fails and treats unset variables as an error. This helps catch issues early in the script execution.
49-69: Well-implementedwaiton-filesfunction with timeout.The
waiton-filesfunction is well-implemented with a timeout mechanism. This prevents the script from hanging indefinitely if the expected files are never created.🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 51-51: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
[error] 64-64: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
(SC2145)
71-73: Ensure clean environment before test execution.Killing existing processes that might interfere with the test is a good practice. It helps ensure that the test runs in a clean environment.
76-76: Good use of trap for error handling.Setting up a trap to catch errors and interrupts is an excellent practice. It ensures that the cleanup function is called even if the script exits unexpectedly.
107-107: Good use ofwaiton-filesfunction.Using the
waiton-filesfunction to ensure that necessary files exist before proceeding is a good practice. It helps prevent race conditions and ensures that the required components are ready.
165-165: Good practice: Calling cleanup function at the end.Calling the
cleanupfunction at the end of the script ensures that all background processes are properly terminated, even if the test passes. This is a good practice for maintaining a clean environment.
1-166: Overall assessment: Well-structured integration test script with room for improvements.This integration test script is comprehensive and covers the necessary steps for testing the system. It includes good practices such as error handling, process management, and verification steps. However, there are several areas where the script could be improved for better robustness and maintainability:
- Consider using a configuration file for environment variables.
- Improve the robustness of the
cleanupfunction by quoting command substitution.- Add timeouts to waiting mechanisms to prevent potential infinite loops.
- Refactor repetitive sections, such as ciphernode addition, to reduce code duplication.
- Replace fixed sleep intervals with more precise waiting mechanisms where possible.
- Enhance the plaintext verification logic for more accurate comparisons.
Implementing these suggestions would make the script more resilient to edge cases and easier to maintain in the long run.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 29-29: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 51-51: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
[error] 64-64: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
(SC2145)
79-79:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure safe removal of output artifacts.
When using
rm -rfwith variables, it's important to quote the variable to prevent issues if the variable is empty or contains spaces.Consider modifying the line as follows:
-rm -rf $ROOT_DIR/tests/basic_integration/output/* +rm -rf "$ROOT_DIR/tests/basic_integration/output/"*This change ensures that the
rmcommand works as expected even if$ROOT_DIRcontains spaces.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
27-31:⚠️ Potential issueImprove robustness of the cleanup function.
The
cleanupfunction is using unquoted command substitution, which can lead to word splitting issues if multiple job IDs are returned.Consider quoting the command substitution:
cleanup() { echo "Cleaning up processes..." - kill $(jobs -p) 2>/dev/null + kill "$(jobs -p)" 2>/dev/null exit ${1:-1} }This change ensures that all job IDs are properly handled, even if there are spaces or special characters.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 29-29: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
packages/ciphernode/core/src/plaintext_aggregator.rs (6)
13-13: LGTM. Please clarify the purpose ofciphertext_output.The addition of
threshold_maligns with the PR objectives. However, the newciphertext_outputfield wasn't mentioned in the PR description. Could you please explain its purpose and how it relates to the EVM integration?Also applies to: 16-16, 20-20
32-32: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of
ciphertext_outputtoComputeAggregateis consistent with the changes made toPlaintextAggregatorState.
49-51: LGTM. Constructor updated correctly.The
PlaintextAggregator::newmethod has been correctly updated to includethreshold_mandciphertext_output. These new parameters are properly initialized in thePlaintextAggregatorState::Collectingvariant.Also applies to: 59-62
118-118: LGTM. Correctly updated to usethreshold_m.The
Handler<DecryptionshareCreated>implementation has been properly updated to usethreshold_minstead ofnodecount. This change is consistent with the overall refactoring and aligns with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 125-125
215-217: LGTM. Factory method correctly updated.The
PlaintextAggregatorFactory::createmethod has been properly updated to usemeta.threshold_minstead ofmeta.nodecount. The addition ofdata.ciphertext_outputis consistent with the changes made toPlaintextAggregator::new. These changes align with the PR objectives and maintain consistency throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
1-224: Overall LGTM. Please provide more context onciphertext_output.The changes in this file consistently replace
nodecountwiththreshold_m, which aligns with the PR objectives. The addition and handling of theciphertext_outputfield appear to be related to the EVM integration, but this wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR description.Could you please provide more context on the purpose and significance of
ciphertext_outputin relation to the EVM integration? This would help in understanding how these changes contribute to the overall objectives of the PR.packages/ciphernode/core/src/lib.rs (3)
5-24: LGTM: Module changes align with EVM integration objectivesThe addition of EVM-related modules (
evm_ciphernode_registry,evm_enclave) and the removal of theenclave_contractmodule align well with the PR objectives of integrating EVM functionality. These changes suggest a shift towards a more EVM-centric approach in the codebase.Also applies to: 31-47
172-175: LGTM: Event parameter renaming improves clarityThe renaming of
nodecounttothreshold_mandsortition_seedtoseedin theE3Requestedevent structure improves clarity and potentially aligns better with EVM terminology. These changes are in line with the PR objectives of updating event structures.
Line range hint
386-394: LGTM: Updated P2P actor testThe changes in the P2P actor test, particularly the updates to the
E3Requestedevent structure, ensure that the tests align with the new event structures and P2P functionality. These changes are consistent with the PR objectives of integrating EVM functionality and updating event handling.packages/ciphernode/core/src/keyshare.rs (1)
15-19: Update ofaddressfield type toStringChanging the
addressfield fromAddresstoStringsimplifies its representation. Ensure that all dependent code and method calls are updated to accommodate this change.
Closes: #92 #91 #86 #87 #89 #90
Usage
You can run an integration test with:
You need to ensure you have the default hardhat mnemonic in place for the contract addresses to be correct:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
E3Requested, enhancing event handling capabilities.Stringinstead ofAddress, simplifying address management.PublicKeyWriteractor for handling public key aggregation events.package.jsonfor managing cipher nodes and EVM interactions.CiphernodeAddedandCiphernodeRemovedto manage cipher nodes in the Ethereum context.test_encryptor.rsfor encrypting data using a homomorphic encryption public key.Bug Fixes
nodecounttothreshold_mandsortition_seedtoseedfor consistency.Refactor
EthAddrstruct and other deprecated types, streamlining the codebase.Chores