Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Sepolia Deployment #182

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Update Sepolia Deployment #182

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

hmzakhalid
Copy link
Member

@hmzakhalid hmzakhalid commented Nov 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated contract deployment details, including a new contract address and transaction hash.
    • Enhanced internal storage identifiers for improved contract management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted gas consumption metrics to reflect accurate usage.
  • Documentation

    • Updated metadata fields for better clarity and tracking of contract changes.

@hmzakhalid hmzakhalid requested a review from ryardley November 14, 2024 06:46
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the NaiveRegistryFilter.json file, which include a new contract address, updated transaction hash, and modifications to various metadata fields. Key adjustments also encompass changes in the receipt section, such as the contract address and transaction index, along with updates to the block number and cumulative gas used. Additionally, the solcInputHash and internal storage layout identifiers (astId) for specific fields have been altered, reflecting changes in the contract's deployment details and internal structure.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/evm/deployments/sepolia/NaiveRegistryFilter.json Updated contract address, transaction hash, receipt details, block number, cumulative gas used, solcInputHash, and astId values for registry and committees.

Possibly related PRs

  • new sepolia deployment #157: This PR involves significant updates to the same NaiveRegistryFilter.json file, including changes to the contract address and transaction hash, which are directly related to the modifications in the main PR.
  • new sepolia deployment #166: This PR also updates the NaiveRegistryFilter.json file, reflecting changes to the contract address and transaction hash, indicating a direct connection to the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • samepant
  • ryardley

Poem

🐇 In the land of contracts, a change took flight,
With addresses shifting, oh what a sight!
The hashes now dance in a new, bright glow,
As the bunny hops forth, with data to show.
Let's celebrate updates, both big and small,
In the world of code, we cherish them all! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc7d047 and caccbfe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/evm/deployments/sepolia/NaiveRegistryFilter.json (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/evm/deployments/sepolia/NaiveRegistryFilter.json (3)

402-415: Storage layout changes look good

The storage layout updates only involve astId changes due to recompilation, with no structural modifications to the contract's storage:

  • registry field astId: 3289
  • committees mapping astId: 3294
  • Committee struct astId: 3287

The storage structure, types, and their encoding remain unchanged.

Also applies to: 441-446, 448-474


348-348: Contract is ready for verification

The deployment includes all necessary data for contract verification:

  • solcInputHash: c0f9a30d0a9d62ed2e9527f5f26eeea3
  • Complete source code and metadata

2-2: Verify deployment transaction and registry address

The contract has been redeployed with:

  • New address: 0xcBaCE7C360b606bb554345b20884A28e41436934
  • Block number: 7073319
  • Registry address: 0x0952388f6028a9Eda93a5041a3B216Ea331d97Ab

Also applies to: 300-300, 304-304, 338-338, 345-345

✅ Verification successful

Contract deployment addresses verified successfully

The deployment changes are consistent and properly reflected:

  • New NaiveRegistryFilter contract is deployed at 0xcBaCE7C360b606bb554345b20884A28e41436934
  • Registry address 0x0952388f6028a9Eda93a5041a3B216Ea331d97Ab is correctly referenced in both NaiveRegistryFilter and CiphernodeRegistryOwnable deployments
  • Old contract address is not referenced anywhere in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the deployment transaction and registry address

# Check if the registry address exists in the codebase
echo "Checking registry address references..."
rg -A 5 "0x0952388f6028a9Eda93a5041a3B216Ea331d97Ab"

# Check if there are any hardcoded references to the old contract address
echo "Checking old contract address references..."
rg -A 5 "0xf17EAedd621FD93f68C480EC9759a2a47813a7cD"

Length of output: 151240


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the deployment and registry addresses in a more focused way

# Check for the old contract address in deployment files
echo "Checking old contract address in deployment files..."
fd -t f -e json . deployments/ --exec grep -l "0xf17EAedd621FD93f68C480EC9759a2a47813a7cD" {} \;

# Check for the new contract address in deployment files
echo "Checking new contract address in deployment files..."
fd -t f -e json . deployments/ --exec grep -l "0xcBaCE7C360b606bb554345b20884A28e41436934" {} \;

# Check for the registry address in deployment files
echo "Checking registry address in deployment files..."
fd -t f -e json . deployments/ --exec grep -l "0x0952388f6028a9Eda93a5041a3B216Ea331d97Ab" {} \;

# Check for any hardcoded contract addresses in source files
echo "Checking for hardcoded addresses in source files..."
rg -t sol "0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}"

Length of output: 1109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the deployment files

# Check for the old contract address in any file
echo "Checking old contract address..."
rg "0xf17EAedd621FD93f68C480EC9759a2a47813a7cD"

# Check for the new contract address in any file
echo "Checking new contract address..."
rg "0xcBaCE7C360b606bb554345b20884A28e41436934"

# Check for the registry address in any file
echo "Checking registry address..."
rg "0x0952388f6028a9Eda93a5041a3B216Ea331d97Ab"

# List all files in packages/evm/deployments to understand structure
echo "Listing deployment files..."
ls -R packages/evm/deployments/

Length of output: 2143


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ryardley ryardley merged commit 4f1756a into main Nov 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@hmzakhalid hmzakhalid deleted the hmza/update-deployment branch December 11, 2024 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants