Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add setting to disable the git apply step in test patch (#22130)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
For a long time Gitea has tested PR patches using a git apply --check
method, and in fact prior to the introduction of a read-tree assisted
three-way merge in #18004, this was the only way of checking patches.

Since #18004, the git apply --check method has been a fallback method,
only used when the read-tree three-way merge method has detected a
conflict. The read-tree assisted three-way merge method is much faster
and less resource intensive method of detecting conflicts. #18004 kept
the git apply method around because it was thought possible that this
fallback might be able to rectify conflicts that the read-tree three-way
merge detected. I am not certain if this could ever be the case.

Given the uncertainty here and the now relative stability of the
read-tree method - this PR makes using this fallback optional and
disables it by default. The hope is that users will not notice any
significant difference in conflict detection and we will be able to
remove the git apply fallback in future, and/or improve the read-tree
three-way merge method to catch any conflicts that git apply method
might have been able to fix.

An additional benefit is that patch checking should be significantly
less resource intensive and much quicker.

(See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22083\#issuecomment-1347961737)

Ref #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
  • Loading branch information
3 people authored Dec 19, 2022
1 parent a89b399 commit d6b9662
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 23 additions and 4 deletions.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions custom/conf/app.example.ini
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1036,6 +1036,9 @@ ROUTER = console
;;
;; Add co-authored-by and co-committed-by trailers if committer does not match author
;ADD_CO_COMMITTER_TRAILERS = true
;;
;; In addition to testing patches using the three-way merge method, re-test conflicting patches with git apply
;TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY = false

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/content/doc/advanced/config-cheat-sheet.en-us.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ In addition there is _`StaticRootPath`_ which can be set as a built-in at build
- `DEFAULT_MERGE_MESSAGE_OFFICIAL_APPROVERS_ONLY`: **true**: In default merge messages only include approvers who are officially allowed to review.
- `POPULATE_SQUASH_COMMENT_WITH_COMMIT_MESSAGES`: **false**: In default squash-merge messages include the commit message of all commits comprising the pull request.
- `ADD_CO_COMMITTER_TRAILERS`: **true**: Add co-authored-by and co-committed-by trailers to merge commit messages if committer does not match author.
- `TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY`: **false**: PR patches are tested using a three-way merge method to discover if there are conflicts. If this setting is set to **true**, conflicting patches will be retested using `git apply` - This was the previous behaviour in 1.18 (and earlier) but is somewhat inefficient. Please report if you find that this setting is required.

### Repository - Issue (`repository.issue`)

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions modules/setting/repository.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ var (
DefaultMergeMessageOfficialApproversOnly bool
PopulateSquashCommentWithCommitMessages bool
AddCoCommitterTrailers bool
TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply bool
} `ini:"repository.pull-request"`

// Issue Setting
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -204,6 +205,7 @@ var (
DefaultMergeMessageOfficialApproversOnly bool
PopulateSquashCommentWithCommitMessages bool
AddCoCommitterTrailers bool
TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply bool
}{
WorkInProgressPrefixes: []string{"WIP:", "[WIP]"},
// Same as GitHub. See
Expand Down
21 changes: 17 additions & 4 deletions services/pull/patch.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/process"
repo_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/repository"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"

"github.com/gobwas/glob"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -289,13 +290,15 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *

// 2. AttemptThreeWayMerge first - this is much quicker than plain patch to base
description := fmt.Sprintf("PR[%d] %s/%s#%d", pr.ID, pr.BaseRepo.OwnerName, pr.BaseRepo.Name, pr.Index)
conflict, _, err := AttemptThreeWayMerge(ctx,
conflict, conflictFiles, err := AttemptThreeWayMerge(ctx,
tmpBasePath, gitRepo, pr.MergeBase, "base", "tracking", description)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}

if !conflict {
// No conflicts detected so we need to check if the patch is empty...
// a. Write the newly merged tree and check the new tree-hash
var treeHash string
treeHash, _, err = git.NewCommand(ctx, "write-tree").RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: tmpBasePath})
if err != nil {
Expand All @@ -307,6 +310,8 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
if err != nil {
return false, err
}

// b. compare the new tree-hash with the base tree hash
if treeHash == baseTree.ID.String() {
log.Debug("PullRequest[%d]: Patch is empty - ignoring", pr.ID)
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusEmpty
Expand All @@ -315,9 +320,17 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
return false, nil
}

// 3. OK read-tree has failed so we need to try a different thing - this might actually succeed where the above fails due to whitespace handling.
// 3. OK the three-way merge method has detected conflicts
// 3a. Are still testing with GitApply? If not set the conflict status and move on
if !setting.Repository.PullRequest.TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply {
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusConflict
pr.ConflictedFiles = conflictFiles

log.Trace("Found %d files conflicted: %v", len(pr.ConflictedFiles), pr.ConflictedFiles)
return true, nil
}

// 3a. Create a plain patch from head to base
// 3b. Create a plain patch from head to base
tmpPatchFile, err := os.CreateTemp("", "patch")
if err != nil {
log.Error("Unable to create temporary patch file! Error: %v", err)
Expand All @@ -340,7 +353,7 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
patchPath := tmpPatchFile.Name()
tmpPatchFile.Close()

// 3b. if the size of that patch is 0 - there can be no conflicts!
// 3c. if the size of that patch is 0 - there can be no conflicts!
if stat.Size() == 0 {
log.Debug("PullRequest[%d]: Patch is empty - ignoring", pr.ID)
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusEmpty
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d6b9662

Please sign in to comment.