Add agit flow support in gitea #14295

a1012112796 · 2021-01-10T15:53:46Z

ref: https://git-repo.info/en/2020/03/agit-flow-and-git-repo/

examle:

NOTICE: All existed repositories will not have the new hooks, you have to rewrite the hooks via admin panel.

ref: https://git-repo.info/en/2020/03/agit-flow-and-git-repo/ example: ```Bash git checkout -b test echo "test" >> README.md git commit -m "test" git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master -o topic=test ``` Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* master: [skip ci] Updated licenses and gitignores

codecov-io · 2021-02-07T09:08:06Z

Codecov Report

Merging #14295 (5140fd7) into master (487f2ee) will decrease coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 13.10%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #14295      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.21%   42.03%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         767      768       +1     
  Lines       81624    82118     +494     
==========================================
+ Hits        34458    34515      +57     
- Misses      41531    41944     +413     
- Partials     5635     5659      +24

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cmd/serv.go	`2.53% <0.00%> (-0.10%)`	⬇️
models/migrations/migrations.go	`2.59% <ø> (ø)`
models/migrations/v172.go	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
modules/git/repo_branch.go	`67.50% <0.00%> (-6.48%)`	⬇️
modules/private/hook.go	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
modules/repository/hooks.go	`18.80% <0.00%> (-0.84%)`	⬇️
routers/repo/http.go	`40.86% <0.00%> (-0.21%)`	⬇️
routers/repo/issue.go	`38.37% <0.00%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
routers/routes/web.go	`89.98% <0.00%> (-1.26%)`	⬇️
services/pull/commit_status.go	`4.10% <0.00%> (-0.37%)`	⬇️
... and 21 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 487f2ee...5140fd7. Read the comment docs.

lunny · 2021-02-08T01:49:10Z

@jiangxin Could we ask you to help to review this PR?

models/pull.go

* master: Fixed irritating error message related to go version (go-gitea#14611) Use OldRef instead of CommitSHA for DeleteBranch comments (go-gitea#14604) Add information on how to build statically (go-gitea#14594) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin Exclude the current dump file from the dump (go-gitea#14606) Remove spurious DataAsync Error logging (go-gitea#14599) [API] Add delete release by tag & fix unreleased inconsistency (go-gitea#14563) Fix rate limit bug when downloading assets on migrating from github (go-gitea#14564) [API] Add affected files of commits to commit struct (go-gitea#14579)

* master: Add support for ref parameter to get raw file API (go-gitea#14602)

cmd/hook.go

jiangxin · 2021-02-09T02:27:39Z

cmd/hook.go

+
+	const VersionHead string = "version=1"
+
+	if !strings.HasPrefix(rs.Data, VersionHead) {


You should split rs.Data by the NUL character ('\0'). Part one is version, and part two is capabilities.

jiangxin · 2021-02-09T02:28:41Z

cmd/hook.go

+
+	hasPushOptions := false
+	response := []byte(VersionHead)
+	if strings.Contains(rs.Data, "push-options") {


You should split capabilities using space character, and try to match each capability.
If there is a new capability called "push-options-v2", using string.Contains is wrong.

cmd/hook.go

jiangxin · 2021-02-09T02:39:02Z

It's not good to have a merge commit for others to review, so please rebase your topic.

a1012112796 · 2021-02-09T05:21:35Z

@jiangxin Thanks for your carefully check, I will change them soon.

a1012112796 · 2021-02-09T09:33:38Z

@jiangxin Another question, I know your designed style to create pull request is git push origin HEAD:refs/for/<target-branch>/<session>, But the <target-branch> also maybe contain /.
I wonder.... (now I have to change it to git push origin HEAD:refs/for/<target-branch> -o topic=<session>).
Can you tell me reason? Thanks.

models/migrations/v190.go

lunny

Please change more PullRequestStyle to PullRequestFlow, otherwise LGTM

lunny · 2021-07-28T09:42:33Z

make L-G-T-M work.

wULLSnpAXbWZGYDYyhWTKKspEQoaYxXyhoisqHf · 2021-07-28T10:44:11Z

🚀

@jiangxin

* feature: add agit flow support ref: https://git-repo.info/en/2020/03/agit-flow-and-git-repo/ example: ```Bash git checkout -b test echo "test" >> README.md git commit -m "test" git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master -o topic=test ``` Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * fix lint * simplify code add fix some nits * update merge help message * Apply suggestions from code review. Thanks @jiangxin * add forced-update message * fix lint * splite writePktLine * add refs/for/<target-branch>/<topic-branch> support also * Add test code add fix api * fix lint * fix test * skip test if git version < 2.29 * try test with git 2.30.1 * fix permission check bug * fix some nit * logic implify and test code update * fix bug * apply suggestions from code review * prepare for merge Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * fix permission check bug - test code update - apply suggestions from code review @zeripath Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * fix bug when target branch isn't exist * prevent some special push and fix some nits * fix lint * try splite * Apply suggestions from code review - fix permission check - handle user rename * fix version negotiation * remane * fix template * handle empty repo * ui: fix branch link under the title * fix nits Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

…ndard refs There was an inadvertent breaking change in go-gitea#15629 meaning that notes refs and other git extension refs will be automatically rejected. Further following go-gitea#14295 and go-gitea#15629 the pre-recieve hook code is untenably long and too complex. This PR refactors the hook code and removes the incorrect forced rejection of non-standard refs. Fix go-gitea#16688 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

…ndard refs (#16705) * Clean-up HookPreReceive and restore functionality for pushing non-standard refs There was an inadvertent breaking change in #15629 meaning that notes refs and other git extension refs will be automatically rejected. Further following #14295 and #15629 the pre-recieve hook code is untenably long and too complex. This PR refactors the hook code and removes the incorrect forced rejection of non-standard refs. Fix #16688 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

wxiaoguang · 2025-07-09T05:58:17Z

services/agit/agit.go

+			return nil
+		}
+
+		pull_service.AddToTaskQueue(pr)


@a1012112796 Do we need to call pull_service.AddToTaskQueue (pull_service.StartPullRequestCheckImmediately in new code) here?

The PR check would also be added in the post-receive hook?

@a1012112796 ping , what do you think?

a1012112796 added type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. pr/wip This PR is not ready for review labels Jan 10, 2021

a1012112796 mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2021

reply issue by email #13585

Closed

1 task

a1012112796 mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2021

Discussion of v1.15.x Roadmap #14477

Closed

12 tasks

a1012112796 added 3 commits February 7, 2021 16:27

feature: add agit flow support

36c77da

ref: https://git-repo.info/en/2020/03/agit-flow-and-git-repo/ example: ```Bash git checkout -b test echo "test" >> README.md git commit -m "test" git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master -o topic=test ``` Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

Merge branch 'master' into git_simple_pr

b8784f9

* master: [skip ci] Updated licenses and gitignores

fix lint

a757ed5

a1012112796 force-pushed the git_simple_pr branch from 736f1b8 to a757ed5 Compare February 7, 2021 08:34

a1012112796 changed the title ~~WIP: try add agit flow support in gitea~~ add agit flow support in gitea Feb 7, 2021

a1012112796 added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. and removed type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. pr/wip This PR is not ready for review labels Feb 7, 2021

a1012112796 marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2021 08:39

GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 7, 2021

lunny added this to the 1.15.0 milestone Feb 8, 2021

lunny reviewed Feb 8, 2021

View reviewed changes

models/pull.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

lunny reviewed Feb 8, 2021

View reviewed changes

models/pull.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

a1012112796 added 4 commits February 8, 2021 23:19

simplify code add fix some nits

f96e9e7

update merge help message

7294bfa

Merge branch 'master' into git_simple_pr

c1291fa

* master: Add support for ref parameter to get raw file API (go-gitea#14602)

jiangxin suggested changes Feb 9, 2021

View reviewed changes

a1012112796 added 3 commits February 9, 2021 16:41

Apply suggestions from code review. Thanks @jiangxin

0d9442e

add forced-update message

86acbe1

fix lint

95ca26a

lunny reviewed Jul 28, 2021

View reviewed changes

models/migrations/v190.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

lunny approved these changes Jul 28, 2021

View reviewed changes

GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jul 28, 2021

lunny and others added 2 commits July 28, 2021 11:34

Merge branch 'main' into git_simple_pr

3b6594a

fix nits

f351805

lunny merged commit 3705168 into go-gitea:main Jul 28, 2021

a1012112796 deleted the git_simple_pr branch July 29, 2021 03:36

wULLSnpAXbWZGYDYyhWTKKspEQoaYxXyhoisqHf mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2021

agit flow hook refuses forced pushes #16679

Closed

3 tasks

zeripath mentioned this pull request Aug 16, 2021

Clean-up HookPreReceive and restore functionality for pushing non-standard refs #16705

Merged

go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 19, 2021

techknowlogick mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2022

1.16.0-rc1 changelog #18309

Merged

This was referenced Jan 30, 2022

Changelog 1.16.0 #18468

Merged

Changelog 1.16.0 & 1.15.11 (#18468 & #18455) #18470

Merged

6543 mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2022

Describe agit flow in docs #21018

Closed

wxiaoguang mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2023

Support reflogs #22451

Merged

a1012112796 mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024

agit flow add refs/for-review/<pull index> support #31245

Open

wxiaoguang reviewed Jul 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

GiteaBot added lgtm/blocked A maintainer has reservations with the PR and thus it cannot be merged and removed lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. labels Jul 9, 2025

go-gitea unlocked this conversation Jul 9, 2025

go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2025

go-gitea unlocked this conversation Jul 17, 2025

go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 17, 2025


		const VersionHead string = "version=1"

		if !strings.HasPrefix(rs.Data, VersionHead) {

Uh oh!

Add agit flow support in gitea #14295

Add agit flow support in gitea #14295

Uh oh!

Conversation

a1012112796 commented Jan 10, 2021 • edited by lunny Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov-io commented Feb 7, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

lunny commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jiangxin Feb 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jiangxin Feb 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jiangxin commented Feb 9, 2021

Uh oh!

a1012112796 commented Feb 9, 2021

Uh oh!

a1012112796 commented Feb 9, 2021

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

lunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lunny commented Jul 28, 2021

Uh oh!

wULLSnpAXbWZGYDYyhWTKKspEQoaYxXyhoisqHf commented Jul 28, 2021

Uh oh!

wxiaoguang Jul 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wxiaoguang Jul 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

a1012112796 commented Jan 10, 2021 •

edited by lunny

Loading

codecov-io commented Feb 7, 2021 •

edited

Loading