-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raw file API: deprecate {ref} path parameter + allow shortened commit refs #17185
Closed
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2e128ba
put auth middleware before any parsing
noerw d4fc683
raw file api: clarify documentation
noerw df834a7
raw file API: add support for shortened commit SHA
noerw e1e33a8
add test for short shas
noerw 436262f
Merge branch 'main' into fix-17179
zeripath e2903f4
Merge branch 'main' into fix-17179
lunny File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I doubt that that will improve the situation.
"Great. Now I cannot even get the README.md".
Maybe it would be better to check whether that file is tracked when the if three lines below is entered before returning the error.
Or do I misunderstand what this is supposed to do?
Regarding the else block below, I am fairly certain that I am misunderstanding something here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think hard-coding the length is a good idea. Maybe git will use SHA256 in future.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28159071/why-doesnt-git-use-more-modern-sha
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@delvh no this won't happen, as we check if such a commit exists. If not,
getRefName()
falls back to treating the entire thing as a TreePath and returns Repo.DefaultBranch as ref, in which case we don't enter this if-clause at all.@wxiaoguang this is all over the codebase, definitily a different issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can introduce a function like
IsPossibleGitCommit
and use it from now on. It's easier to understand and maintain.