Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not set Accept header twice #28598

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2023
Merged

Do not set Accept header twice #28598

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2023

Conversation

KN4CK3R
Copy link
Member

@KN4CK3R KN4CK3R commented Dec 23, 2023

Revert #28550

Don't add the Accept header twice.

@KN4CK3R KN4CK3R added the skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features. label Dec 23, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Dec 23, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 23, 2023
@delvh delvh changed the title Fix multiple set of Accept header Do not set Accept header twice Dec 23, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Dec 23, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Dec 23, 2023
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 24, 2023

How about removing another Accept to not make maintainers confusing?

@KN4CK3R
Copy link
Member Author

KN4CK3R commented Dec 24, 2023

Then you would have to set that header on every call which is the opposite of what should be done.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 24, 2023

Then you would have to set that header on every call which is the opposite of what should be done.

Why not? It will be clearer than before?

@KN4CK3R
Copy link
Member Author

KN4CK3R commented Dec 24, 2023

How is it clearer to set a mandatory value outside a method called by every place? Currently we have a method createRequest every caller uses which sets that mandatory value.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 24, 2023

How is it clearer to set a mandatory value outside a method called by every place? Currently we have a method createRequest every caller uses which sets that mandatory value.

Only 4 places invoking createRequest, I think it's clear that removing req.Header.Set("Accept", MediaType) in the function and add it to the function parameter header map.

@KN4CK3R
Copy link
Member Author

KN4CK3R commented Dec 24, 2023

Ok, I disagree on that one.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 28, 2023

Anyway, let's merge this one first.

@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Dec 28, 2023
@lunny lunny enabled auto-merge (squash) December 28, 2023 03:22
@lunny lunny merged commit 4cd666d into go-gitea:main Dec 28, 2023
25 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Dec 28, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Dec 28, 2023
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
* giteaofficial/main:
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  switch destination directory for apt signing keys (go-gitea#28639)
  Extend description for ARTIFACT_RETENTION_DAYS (go-gitea#28626)
  Refactor timeutil package (go-gitea#28623)
  Refactor some legacy code and remove unused code (go-gitea#28622)
  Remove unnecessary syncbranchToDB with tests (go-gitea#28624)
  Do not set `Accept` header twice (go-gitea#28598)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  fix wrong link in user and organization profile when using relative url (go-gitea#28617)
  Add get actions runner registration token for API routes, repo, org, user and global level (go-gitea#27144)
  Fix session key conflict with database keyword (go-gitea#28613)
@KN4CK3R KN4CK3R deleted the revert-28550 branch January 14, 2024 21:22
fuxiaohei pushed a commit to fuxiaohei/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Revert go-gitea#28550

Don't add the `Accept` header twice.
silverwind pushed a commit to silverwind/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Revert go-gitea#28550

Don't add the `Accept` header twice.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. skip-changelog This PR is irrelevant for the (next) changelog, for example bug fixes for unreleased features.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants