Skip to content

Conversation

@GiteaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport #30529 by @silverwind

Fixes: #30512

I think this does mean those tools would run on a potential vendor directory, but I'm not sure we really support vendoring of dependencies anymore.

release has a vendor prerequisite so likely the source tarballs contain vendor files?

Fixes: go-gitea#30512

I think this does mean those tools would run on a potential `vendor`
directory, but I'm not sure we really support vendoring of dependencies
anymore.

`release` has a `vendor` prerequisite so likely the source tarballs
contain vendor files?
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code modifies/internal labels Apr 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Apr 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot requested review from delvh and lunny April 17, 2024 09:40
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 17, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 17, 2024
@silverwind silverwind merged commit 5c55851 into go-gitea:release/v1.22 Apr 17, 2024
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 16, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code modifies/internal

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants