Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Approvals at Branch Protection #5350

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Dec 11, 2018

Conversation

jonasfranz
Copy link
Member

@jonasfranz jonasfranz commented Nov 18, 2018

Fixes #5251

This PR adds approvals limitations to branch protection. A pitfall is that it is currently only possible to assign Teams/Users with write permissions to branch protection. I've removed this for teams but not for users.

Screenshots

screenshot_2018-11-18 approvals 3 screenshot_2018-11-18 approvals 2
screenshot_2018-11-18 approvals 1 screenshot_2018-11-18 approvals

Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
@jonasfranz jonasfranz added the type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. label Nov 18, 2018
@jonasfranz jonasfranz added this to the 1.7.0 milestone Nov 18, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 18, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #5350 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 25.47%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5350      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   37.61%   37.61%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         317      318       +1     
  Lines       46835    46928      +93     
==========================================
+ Hits        17619    17650      +31     
- Misses      26712    26770      +58     
- Partials     2504     2508       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
models/migrations/migrations.go 2.61% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
modules/auth/repo_form.go 39% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
routers/repo/issue.go 37.28% <0%> (-0.28%) ⬇️
models/review.go 59.77% <0%> (-4.3%) ⬇️
models/migrations/v74.go 0% <0%> (ø)
models/branches.go 43.33% <25.53%> (-4%) ⬇️
models/org_team.go 49.3% <40%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
routers/repo/setting_protected_branch.go 40.23% <43.47%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
models/pull.go 51.42% <75%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64680b7...cf95a76. Read the comment docs.

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Nov 18, 2018
models/branches.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Nov 18, 2018

@JonasFranzDEV any screenshot?

@jonasfranz
Copy link
Member Author

@lunny fixed your first comment and added screenshots.

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Nov 21, 2018
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Nov 21, 2018

I think this depends on #5132 to have single method that returns latest per-user reviews

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Nov 22, 2018

right, blocked by #5132

@lafriks lafriks added the type/changelog Adds the changelog for a new Gitea version label Nov 22, 2018
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Nov 22, 2018

Do we allow merging if there is request for changes?

@kolaente
Copy link
Member

@lafriks I'd make this an option which could be toggled on or off in the settings (default not allowing)

@jonasfranz
Copy link
Member Author

@lafriks I think that is out of scope of this PR since this just checks if there are at least X approvals by granted users. But it will only check for the latest approval/rejection of a user as @lunny mentioned.

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Nov 22, 2018

Yes this can be added in other PR as an option

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Nov 22, 2018

@lafriks I think @JonasFranzDEV is right, allow merging or not when there is request for changes should be another PR.

…sFranzDEV/gitea into feature/branch-protection-approvals

Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>

# Conflicts:
#	models/review_test.go
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2018
@jonasfranz
Copy link
Member Author

@lunny need your review

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Nov 28, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Nov 29, 2018

file conflict.

@jonasfranz
Copy link
Member Author

@lunny File conflicts resolved

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 1, 2018

Pull detail page will result in 500 on MSSQL.
image

@kolaente
Copy link
Member

kolaente commented Dec 2, 2018

@lunny is this using the function from Review summaries?

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 3, 2018

@kolaente yes, I think that's the reason.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 11, 2018

Maybe this could be resolved by #5502

@jonasfranz
Copy link
Member Author

Can you verify that? @lunny

@lunny lunny merged commit 9681c83 into go-gitea:master Dec 11, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Dec 11, 2018

@JonasFranzDEV it seems it's has some bug on Mssql. See
image

@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2018
@jonasfranz jonasfranz deleted the feature/branch-protection-approvals branch December 13, 2018 21:13
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2019

@JonasFranzDEV it seems it's has some bug on Mssql. See
image

Agree, the same error but with sqlite db.

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jun 26, 2019

You have to add test1 to approvals list on protected branch. Otherwise his approvals will not be counted.

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
@delvh delvh removed the type/changelog Adds the changelog for a new Gitea version label Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pull requests approvals limitations
7 participants