Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support n as a line highlight prefix #5987

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2019

Conversation

emonty
Copy link
Contributor

@emonty emonty commented Feb 7, 2019

We're working on rolling out gitea as a replacement for a fairly
large cgit installation. Part of this involves a metric ton of
mod_rewrite rules so that links people have out in the wild will
still work. Unfortunately, cgit uses #n1 in the url to indicate
a single line highlight, which doesn't get passed to the server
and therefore can't be rewritten.

We've got a local workaround by shoving a script block into a
custom header template, but thought it might be nicer to upstream
a simple patch to support #n as a prefix for single line highlights.
(luckily for simplicity, cgit does not support ranges)

Signed-off-by: Monty Taylor mordred@inaugust.com

We're working on rolling out gitea as a replacement for a fairly
large cgit installation. Part of this involves a metric ton of
mod_rewrite rules so that links people have out in the wild will
still work. Unfortunately, cgit uses #n1 in the url to indicate
a single line highlight, which doesn't get passed to the server
and therefore can't be rewritten.

We've got a local workaround by shoving a script block into a
custom header template, but thought it might be nicer to upstream
a simple patch to support #n as a prefix for single line highlights.
(luckily for simplicity, cgit does not support ranges)

Signed-off-by: Monty Taylor <mordred@inaugust.com>
@emonty
Copy link
Contributor Author

emonty commented Feb 7, 2019

Incidentally, if landing this upstream isn't cool, no worries.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 7, 2019
@techknowlogick techknowlogick added the topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI label Feb 7, 2019
@techknowlogick techknowlogick added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Feb 7, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #5987 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5987   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.79%   38.79%           
=======================================
  Files         330      330           
  Lines       48729    48729           
=======================================
  Hits        18904    18904           
- Misses      27085    27086    +1     
+ Partials     2740     2739    -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
models/unit.go 0% <0%> (-14.29%) ⬇️
models/repo_list.go 64.55% <0%> (+1.26%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update da1edbf...a69abdd. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 7, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 7, 2019
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 44d6a90 into go-gitea:master Feb 7, 2019
@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Thanks for PR @emonty

jeblair pushed a commit to jeblair/gitea that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
We're working on rolling out gitea as a replacement for a fairly
large cgit installation. Part of this involves a metric ton of
mod_rewrite rules so that links people have out in the wild will
still work. Unfortunately, cgit uses #n1 in the url to indicate
a single line highlight, which doesn't get passed to the server
and therefore can't be rewritten.

We've got a local workaround by shoving a script block into a
custom header template, but thought it might be nicer to upstream
a simple patch to support #n as a prefix for single line highlights.
(luckily for simplicity, cgit does not support ranges)

Signed-off-by: Monty Taylor <mordred@inaugust.com>
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants