-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Track multiplicities for mustLocks #1073
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a7662f4
Track multiplicities for mustLocks
michael-schwarz f453888
Add test for recursive mutex
michael-schwarz d652f7a
Add test for termination with nesting
michael-schwarz da808f4
Do not record multiplicites in accesses
michael-schwarz 1565056
Cleanup
michael-schwarz 2836ded
Fix lattice order
michael-schwarz 46a8103
Use `max_count`
michael-schwarz 8c9dfef
Merge branch 'master' into issue_800
michael-schwarz b81f411
Remove warn argument from LocksetAnalysis.MayArg
sim642 26e0777
Update tests/regression/71-doublelocking/16-rec-dyn-no-path-sense.c
michael-schwarz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a quick thought: instead of keeping the lockset both as
Lockset
and as the key set ofMultiplicity
, couldn't we just have some multiset that behaves as both?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, and I thought about it for a while. The idea why I decided against it for now is that it will only be a small minority of mutexes that are recursive, so I want to avoid additional overhead in as many places as possible.
Also, keeping the representation that is needed by other analysis (lockset without multiplicities) around might be advantageous over having to construct it all the time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Queries.MustLockset
reconstructs it all the time anyway since the query returns a different type, but this can be for the time being.