DTLS support + optional ENet encryption #36296
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
UDP sockets can be "connected" to filter packets from a specific source. In case of a bound socket (e.g. server), a new socket can be created on the same address/port that will receive all packets that are not filtered by a more specific socket (e.g. the previously connect socket). This way, a UDPServer can listen to new packets, and return a new PacketPeerUDP when receiving one, knowing that is a "new client".
Custom instance implementation via the mbedtls module.
Non-DTLS implementation uses plain NetSocket for performance as before.
Faless
force-pushed
the
dtls/enet_vulkan
branch
from
f3f6f54
to
9eea2cf
Compare
akien-mga
changed the title
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #35091 but for the master branch. The other PR is left for reference and for people who want to try it in 3.2 (plus maybe, just maybe, it could be merged to that branch if we feel confident to do so in the coming months).