Show warning for GeometryInstance3D transparency in Mobile/Compatibility #87231
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This feature is currently only supported when using Forward+.
Calinou
force-pushed
the
geometryinstance3d-transparency-warn-mobile-compatibility
branch
from
d038e3f to
a9893e2
Compare
|
I'd like to see this in 4.3 please :) I ran into this yet again the other day (in the guise of fade distance). |
clayjohn
approved these changes
May 3, 2024
AThousandShips
approved these changes
May 3, 2024
|
Thanks! |
Calinou
deleted the
geometryinstance3d-transparency-warn-mobile-compatibility
branch
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
eswartz
added a commit
to eswartz/godot
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2024
This is mostly a copy-paste of similar changes in the Forward+ renderer, as hinted in godotengine#76774 (comment) and godotengine#87231 (review), along with a tweak to the shader and pipeline model. The shader pipeline tweak involves distinguishing geometry instance-enabled transparency from material-enabled transparency. A material cannot support transparency on a per-instance level; a separate pipeline must be used when rendering. Originally in c571e4a this was a non-trivial refactoring in Forward+ (which in the past few years has evolved a few more times to account for the multitude of combinations allowed there). I opted to follow a similar sentiment to `SceneShaderForwardClustered::PipelineColorPassFlags` in a simpler `SceneShaderForwardMobile::PipelinePasses` enum, which only accounts for don't-care or opaque pipelines vs. color transparency-enabled ones. This multiplies the number of `PipelineCacheRD`s by two, but otherwise accomplishes the goals without adding unnecessary changes or shooting myself or others in the foot (I hope). BTW I also reorganized and removed some redundant checks in `RenderForwardClustered::_geometry_instance_add_surface_with_material` (since I was comparing this side-by-side with the `RenderForwardMobile` version, which seems better-organized). There is no functional change since `has_alpha` is the only variable used and includes all the checks anyway.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This feature is currently only supported when using Forward+.