🧹 v3 (Maintenance): Expand Tests and Benchmarks for Log package #2886
Conversation
gaby
requested review from
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThis update enhances testing capabilities for logging functionalities by adding tests for various log levels and key-value pair logging. It also includes benchmarking for log operations and refines existing tests for setting log levels, with a focus on the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- log/default_test.go (2 hunks)
- log/fiberlog_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
log/fiberlog_test.go (1)
- 26-71: The implementation of
Test_Fiberlog_SetLevelis well-structured and covers multiple scenarios for setting log levels. It's good to see that the test cases are comprehensive, covering all log levels fromLevelDebugtoLevelFatal. This thoroughness ensures that theSetLevelfunctionality is robustly tested across various conditions.One suggestion for improvement is to consider adding a test case for an invalid log level, if applicable, to ensure that the system behaves as expected when faced with unexpected input. This could help in identifying potential areas for error handling improvements within the
SetLevelfunction.Overall, the test function is well-implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives of enhancing test coverage for the log package.
log/default_test.go (3)
- 185-222: The refactoring of
Test_SetLevelto focus solely on setting log levels is a positive change that aligns with best practices for unit testing by ensuring that tests are focused and test only one functionality at a time. This change makes the test more maintainable and its intent clearer.However, it's important to note that the test includes setting a log level to
8, which seems to be outside the predefined log levels. This is a good practice to test edge cases, but it would be beneficial to include a comment explaining the choice of8and what behavior it is expected to test, ensuring clarity for future maintainers.Overall, the refactoring and the additional test cases within
Test_SetLevelenhance the test coverage and maintainability of the log package.
- 224-307: The addition of test functions
Test_Debugw,Test_Infow,Test_Warnw,Test_Errorw,Test_Panicw, andTest_Tracewis commendable. These tests significantly contribute to achieving the PR's objective of expanding the test coverage for the log package. Each test function effectively tests logging with key-value pairs at different log levels, ensuring that the logging functionality works as expected across various scenarios.One minor suggestion for improvement is to ensure consistency in the naming convention of test cases across the file. For example, using a consistent format like
Test_<FunctionName>for all test functions would enhance readability and maintainability.Overall, these test functions are well-implemented and play a crucial role in enhancing the log package's reliability and robustness.
- 347-424: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [309-423]
The introduction of benchmark functions
BenchmarkLogfKeyAndValuesandBenchmarkLogfKeyAndValuesParallelis a significant addition that aligns with the PR's objective of optimizing the benchmarking processes. Running benchmarks in parallel, as done inBenchmarkLogfKeyAndValuesParallel, is particularly useful for assessing the performance of the log package under concurrent usage scenarios, which is crucial for a logging system.It's good to see that the benchmarks cover various log levels and scenarios, including logging with key-values and different formats. This comprehensive approach ensures a thorough performance analysis.
One suggestion for future improvement is to include comments within the benchmark functions explaining the choice of test cases and the expected insights from these benchmarks. This would help maintainers and contributors understand the benchmarks' purpose and interpret their results more effectively.
Overall, these benchmark functions are well-implemented and contribute significantly to the PR's goals of improving performance analysis for the log package.
|
Edit: For some reason the browser couldn't find the word "Log" in the logs. The names are not consistent though, all the core benchmarks have an underscore, the middlewares don't. This should be fixed in a different PR. |
…ber#2886) * Expand test and benchmarks for the Log module * Update name of benchmarks to be more consistent
Description
Changes introduced
List the new features or adjustments introduced in this pull request. Provide details on benchmarks, documentation updates, changelog entries, and if applicable, the migration guide.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist
Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:
/docs/directory for Fiber's documentation.Summary by CodeRabbit
SetLeveltest function for better clarity.