🧹 chore: Update dependencies #3254
Conversation
gaby
requested review from
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new benchmark test function Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
router_test.go(1 hunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)
1-55: Consider implementing version management strategy.The Makefile would benefit from a consistent approach to tool version management. Consider:
- Moving all versions to variables at the top of the Makefile
- Documenting the minimum required Go version
- Adding a version check target to validate the Go environment
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Makefile(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Makefile (4)
1-6: LGTM! Well-documented help command.
The help command effectively extracts and formats documentation from the Makefile comments.
14-18: LGTM! Comprehensive benchmark setup.
The benchmark command correctly includes memory allocation statistics and properly filters for benchmark tests.
45-49: LGTM! Clean dependency management.
The tidy command appropriately uses verbose mode for better visibility into dependency changes.
30-34: Verify golangci-lint version compatibility.
The PR mentions Fasthttp v1.51.0 being the highest version due to Go version constraints. Let's ensure golangci-lint v1.51.0 is compatible with these same constraints.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Go version used in the project to verify compatibility.
golangci-lint v1.51.0 is compatible with project's Go version
The project uses Go 1.20 while golangci-lint v1.51.0 requires Go 1.19. Since Go maintains backward compatibility, using golangci-lint v1.51.0 with Go 1.20 is perfectly fine. The version pinning in the Makefile is appropriate and compatible with the project's constraints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Go version requirements for golangci-lint v1.51.0
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/golangci/golangci-lint/v1.51.0/go.mod | grep -A 1 "^go "
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Go version in go.mod
cat go.mod | grep -A 1 "^go "
Length of output: 40
Description
Fasthttp v1.51.0 is the highest we can use, anything newer requires go1.20/21