🧹 chore: Backport ctx.String() from v3 #3294
Conversation
gaby
requested review from
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ctx.go (1)
1840-1848: Add error handling for buffer write operations.The current implementation ignores potential write errors from
buf.WriteByteandbuf.WriteString. While these operations rarely fail for memory buffers, it's good practice to handle errors in production code.-buf.WriteByte('#') +if err := buf.WriteByte('#'); err != nil { + return "error creating context string" +} // Pad with leading zeros for i := 0; i < (16 - len(id)); i++ { - buf.WriteByte('0') + if err := buf.WriteByte('0'); err != nil { + return "error creating context string" + } } -buf.WriteString(id) -buf.WriteString(" - ") +if err := buf.WriteString(id); err != nil { + return "error creating context string" +} +if err := buf.WriteString(" - "); err != nil { + return "error creating context string" +}🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
1841-1841: Error return value of
buf.WriteByteis not checked(errcheck)
1846-1846: Error return value of
buf.WriteByteis not checked(errcheck)
1848-1848: Error return value of
buf.WriteStringis not checked(errcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
ctx.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
ctx.go
1841-1841: Error return value of buf.WriteByte is not checked
(errcheck)
1846-1846: Error return value of buf.WriteByte is not checked
(errcheck)
1848-1848: Error return value of buf.WriteString is not checked
(errcheck)
1849-1849: Error return value of buf.WriteString is not checked
(errcheck)
1852-1852: Error return value of buf.WriteString is not checked
(errcheck)
1858-1858: Error return value of buf.Write is not checked
(errcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Build (1.23.x, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Build (1.20.x, windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Compare
🔇 Additional comments (4)
ctx.go (4)
1837-1839: LGTM! Efficient buffer initialization.Using
bytebufferpoolfor buffer management is a good practice as it reduces memory allocations and improves performance.
1857-1860: LGTM! Efficient method and URI formatting.Direct buffer writes for method and URI are more efficient than string concatenation or fmt.Sprintf.
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
1858-1858: Error return value of
buf.Writeis not checked(errcheck)
1862-1868: LGTM! Proper buffer cleanup.The code properly manages the buffer lifecycle:
- Gets the final string
- Resets the buffer
- Returns it to the pool
1851-1855: Consider adding address validation.The code directly writes addresses to the buffer without validation. While
LocalAddr()andRemoteAddr()should never return nil, defensive programming would validate these values.🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
1852-1852: Error return value of
buf.WriteStringis not checked(errcheck)
|
golangci-lint fails here, but not locally. |
Description
Backport implementation of
ctx.String()from v3 to v2.Fixes #3236