-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
support custom JSON (de)serialization by delegating to message if it implements json.Marshaler/json.Unmarshaler #325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cybrcodr
merged 4 commits into
golang:master
from
jhump:jh/support-custom-json-marshalling-unmarshalling
May 22, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e7d161e
support custom JSON (de)serialization by delegating to message if it …
jhump e8c65fd
use custom marshal/unmarshal interfaces that can preserve marshaler/u…
jhump cbc0d77
add tests; move JSONPBUnmarshaler check into unmarshalValue
jhump a26be53
address nits
jhump File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cybrcodr, I wasn't sure if this struct could ever become stateful, so I have it passed by ref. Should this instead be pass-by-value? I know it currently just represents marshaling options; but it seemed like, from the name, it could at some point change to such that a pointer is the correct way to pass it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(same goes for passing
Unmarshaler
by pointer in the other interface)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pass by ref sounds good.