Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: suggestion regarding GO-2022-0969 #996

Closed
pjuarezd opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

x/vulndb: suggestion regarding GO-2022-0969 #996

pjuarezd opened this issue Sep 13, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
excluded: OUT_OF_SCOPE This issue is out of scope for this issue tracker. Suggested Edit

Comments

@pjuarezd
Copy link

Report ID

GO-2022-0969

Suggestion/Comment

vulncheck utility stills marks the 1.18.6 as vulnerable despite this vuln was resolved in 1.18.6
Perhaps is due to the report missing the introduced field?

@zpavlinovic
Copy link
Contributor

zpavlinovic commented Sep 13, 2022

Thanks for bringing this up. This is a duplicate of golang/go#55035. I will close it for now, but we can open it again if the fix for that issue does not help.

@julieqiu julieqiu added the excluded: OUT_OF_SCOPE This issue is out of scope for this issue tracker. label Sep 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: OUT_OF_SCOPE This issue is out of scope for this issue tracker. Suggested Edit
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants