-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #1 from listingslab-software/staging
provision version 1.0.0
- Loading branch information
Showing
15 changed files
with
18,202 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -102,3 +102,4 @@ dist | |
|
||
# TernJS port file | ||
.tern-port | ||
.DS_Store |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,2 +1,23 @@ | ||
# ChatGPT | ||
ChatGPT vs Recruitment Technical Tests | ||
## ChatGPT | ||
|
||
### Capter 1) ChatGPT vs Recruitment Technical Tests | ||
|
||
#### Overview | ||
|
||
As a software engineer it’s normal for me to be asked to complete some kind of technical test during a recruitment process. There are many different methods, approaches and mistakes, but there’s value too. As the process has developed, better tools for analysing candidate skills have emerged. Let’s take as an example; testdome.com. It’s a platform on which a hiring manager can create in depth tests which really do measure a candidate’s knowledge in the areas they are interested in | ||
|
||
Trouble is… when I’m looking for a job I’m generally talking to 2 or three different companies at once, so if they all give me big, difficult tech tests I get a bit over it. | ||
|
||
I mean, it’s not like I’m being paid for it is it? | ||
|
||
Now, in May 2023 we witness the emergence of ChatGPT. Much hype around its ability to answer questions in natural language. That’s nothing compared to how well it writes code. Better code than I do. And faster. So with a specific kind of test (eg testdome), I think I could use ChatGPT to complete the coding test quicker and better than I could do myself. So I think I’ll do that. | ||
|
||
Is that cheating? Or is it just doing my job? | ||
|
||
#### Scientific Methodology | ||
|
||
We’re old skool, so we do things the scientific way. Start with a hypothesis, we test it and present it in a way which can be replicated with the same results by any peer reviewer | ||
|
||
#### Hypothesis | ||
|
||
That ChatGPT will score higher in an online recruitment test than I would myself. And with much less time and effort |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "chatgpt", | ||
"version": "1.0.0", | ||
"description": "ChatGPT vs Recruitment Technical Tests", | ||
"main": "index.js", | ||
"scripts": { | ||
"start": "clear && cd ./pwa && npm start", | ||
"test": "echo \"LGTM\" && exit 0" | ||
}, | ||
"keywords": [ | ||
"chatgpt" | ||
], | ||
"author": "@listingslab", | ||
"license": "MIT" | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
# See https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/ for more about ignoring files. | ||
|
||
# dependencies | ||
/node_modules | ||
/.pnp | ||
.pnp.js | ||
|
||
# testing | ||
/coverage | ||
|
||
# production | ||
/build | ||
|
||
# misc | ||
.DS_Store | ||
.env.local | ||
.env.development.local | ||
.env.test.local | ||
.env.production.local | ||
|
||
npm-debug.log* | ||
yarn-debug.log* | ||
yarn-error.log* |
Oops, something went wrong.