This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Manager class for applications using Task API #4657
Manager class for applications using Task API #4657
Changes from all commits
eedce52
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
EnvManager is only required for this single sanity check, I wonder if it's justified to make it a dependency. Especially that you can disable the environment just after enabling the app, thus introducing "invalid" state anyway. Maybe just performing these checks in the RequestedTaskManager when necessary is better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My reasoning is basically that if you don't allow to enable an app when the env is disabled you should disable all the apps when disabling the env as well - which we're not doing. It'd be circular dependency meaning that these classes should be merged, which doesn't make sense. Thus removing this check makes sense to me.