Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Golem-Workers first version #308

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

mateuszsrebrny
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuszsrebrny mateuszsrebrny commented Sep 9, 2024

In this PR:

  • golem-workers directory with Golem-Workers articles
  • Golem-Workers section withing the leftside navigation tree
  • index with brief introduction and links to next steps
  • getting-started article offering two ways to start Golem-Workers service
  • sd-example article detailing mainnet usage of scalepoint/automatic1111 model
  • basic-concepts explainig the api from the high level
  • create-node explanation without the demand section
  • demand section of create-node explanation
  • more detailed explanation of the jsons in sd example
  • troubleshooting section with common mishaps and instructions on how to read logs
  • reputation stacktrace to the troubleshooting art
  • hello example article

Still to be done:

Nice to have:

  • tutorial on using user's own image
  • create cluster explanation
  • other examples
  • Reputation mention
  • real life troubleshooting
  • ssh into the cluster

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
golem-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 16, 2024 0:09am

@mateuszsrebrny mateuszsrebrny merged commit e135b67 into master Sep 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@mateuszsrebrny mateuszsrebrny deleted the mateusz-radek/golem-workers-first-version branch September 19, 2024 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants