Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @scidomino, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical security vulnerability by fixing a permission check that was allowing operations on files and directories outside the designated workspace. The change specifically removes a conditional bypass that was introduced in a previous update, ensuring that all path-related operations are now correctly constrained within the intended boundaries. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Size Change: -103 B (0%) Total Size: 23.7 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a critical path traversal vulnerability by removing a permission check that improperly allowed access to any absolute path when in interactive mode. The change is simple and effective. To prevent future regressions, I've added a security review comment suggesting the addition of unit tests for the isPathAllowed method, aligning with rules on path sanitization and internal validation, even though an integration test is planned for a separate PR.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
packages/core/src/config/config.ts (1791-1793)
This change correctly removes a critical security vulnerability. To prevent regressions, it would be highly beneficial to add unit tests for isPathAllowed that specifically cover this scenario (i.e., an absolute path outside the workspace in interactive mode should not be allowed). I see the note about adding an integration test in a separate PR, but a unit test would provide more targeted and faster feedback.
References
- This change aligns with the principle of sanitizing user-provided file paths to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities, which was the nature of the critical security vulnerability addressed.
- The discussion around
isPathAllowedreinforces the need for utility functions to internally validate path inputs to prevent path traversal, rather than relying on external validation.
|
/patch |
|
✅ Patch workflow(s) dispatched successfully! 📋 Details:
🔗 Track Progress: |
|
🚀 Patch PR Created! 📋 Patch Details:
📝 Next Steps:
🔗 Track Progress: |
|
🚀 Patch PR Created! 📋 Patch Details:
📝 Next Steps:
🔗 Track Progress: |
|
🚀 Patch Release Started! 📋 Release Details:
⏳ Status: The patch release is now running. You'll receive another update when it completes. 🔗 Track Progress: |
|
🚀 Patch Release Started! 📋 Release Details:
⏳ Status: The patch release is now running. You'll receive another update when it completes. 🔗 Track Progress: |
|
✅ Patch Release Complete! 📦 Release Details:
🎉 Status: Your patch has been successfully released and published to npm! 📝 What's Available:
🔗 Links: |
|
✅ Patch Release Complete! 📦 Release Details:
🎉 Status: Your patch has been successfully released and published to npm! 📝 What's Available:
🔗 Links: |
| if (this.interactive && path.isAbsolute(absolutePath)) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Delete line 1791-1794 Not in use, outdated.@scidomino
3 participants
Summary
Fix permission check that was allowed operations outside of workspace dirs.
Details
This issue was introduced in #17185
Because this is urgent I'll create an integration test for this in a separate PR.
Related Issues
Fixes #18394
How to Validate
Pre-Merge Checklist