-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coordinates returned by XEE do not match EE cordinates #57
Comments
In the notebook, Stephan suggests a fix:
I think this is a brilliant idea!! |
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Updating constants as we begin to automate running integration tests. More attention is needed here to tell if the coordinates are accurate. This will be addressed in #57. PiperOrigin-RevId: 572275208
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Updating constants as we begin to automate running integration tests. More attention is needed here to tell if the coordinates are accurate. This will be addressed in #57. PiperOrigin-RevId: 572275208
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Updating constants as we begin to automate running integration tests. More attention is needed here to tell if the coordinates are accurate. This will be addressed in #57. PiperOrigin-RevId: 572278845
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Fixes #57. Per the suggestion of @raspstephan, we avoid computing lat/lng information ourselves and instead pull our coordinate information via RPC calls into EE. There didn't seem to be a good way to do this within `get_info()`, so this introduces two additional IO calls. This should only add overhead to the `open_dataset()` call (i.e. once) and not to every data index operation. Running benchmarks now, so far: ``` open_dataset():avg=33.11,std=8.23,best=22.81,worst=48.00 ``` PiperOrigin-RevId: 572063673
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Fixes #57. Per the suggestion of @raspstephan, we avoid computing lat/lng information ourselves and instead pull our coordinate information via RPC calls into EE. There didn't seem to be a good way to do this within `get_info()`, so this introduces two additional IO calls. This should only add overhead to the `open_dataset()` call (i.e. once) and not to every data index operation. Running benchmarks now, so far: ``` open_dataset():avg=33.11,std=8.23,best=22.81,worst=48.00 ``` PiperOrigin-RevId: 572063673
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
Fixes #57. Per the suggestion of @raspstephan, we avoid computing lat/lng information ourselves and instead pull our coordinate information via RPC calls into EE. There didn't seem to be a good way to do this within `get_info()`, so this introduces two additional IO calls. This should only add overhead to the `open_dataset()` call (i.e. once) and not to every data index operation. Running benchmarks now, so far: ``` open_dataset():avg=33.11,std=8.23,best=22.81,worst=48.00 open_and_chunk():avg=37.61,std=8.79,best=23.95,worst=53.59 ``` PiperOrigin-RevId: 572063673
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The coordinates in the xarray dataset do not match those that EE returns.
For example:
does not match
See this notebook as an example: https://colab.corp.google.com/drive/1-2rbTZF8BShnKF_RasSF0hQ8OoTpRY0C?usp=sharing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: