-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Async getQuestionnairePages and Add progress bar to the 'Next' button #2645
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Async getQuestionnairePages and Add progress bar to the 'Next' button #2645
Conversation
- With unmerged PR #9 - WUP PR google#2178 - WUP google#2652 - WUP google#2521 - WUP google#2645 - WUP google#2648 - WUP google#2650
…ub.com:opensrp/android-fhir into 2639-async-process-for-get-questionnaire-pages
I haven't build the app from your change yet, but it looks like you're adding a new component. Would it be possible for you to do this instead: https://m3.material.io/components/progress-indicators/guidelines#01dea24a-ce29-4353-99da-35472e24f4f9 to combine the circular progress indicator with the next button? |
@jingtang10 yeah, that's exactly what I did |
viewModelScope.launch(Dispatchers.IO) { | ||
var isReferenced = false | ||
kotlin.run { | ||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isExpressionReferencedBy(questionnaire) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
|
||
questionnaire.item.flattened().forEach { item -> | ||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isEnableWhenReferencedBy(item) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
|
||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isExpressionReferencedBy(item) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
} | ||
} | ||
if (isReferenced) isLoadingNextPage.value = true | ||
modificationCount.update { it + 1 } | ||
|
||
updateAnswerWithAffectedCalculatedExpression(questionnaireItem) | ||
|
||
modificationCount.update { it + 1 } | ||
updateAnswerWithAffectedCalculatedExpression(questionnaireItem) | ||
pages = getQuestionnairePages() | ||
isLoadingNextPage.value = false | ||
modificationCount.update { it + 1 } | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should investigate if parallel coroutine here could cause any issues incase of answersChangedCallback
in quick successions like typing an answer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will investigate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just left a comment on the approach, thanks!
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isExpressionReferencedBy(questionnaire) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
|
||
questionnaire.item.flattened().forEach { item -> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a way to avoid this for loop? If the questionnaire is long? Also is there any value in avoiding it? Maybe we can just time this part and see how long it takes given a large questionnaire with many expressions and enable whens. If it takes < x% of the time then we don't really need to worry about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
go through only:
- pages
- do it once
consider to use dependency graph, in the future.
var isReferenced = false | ||
kotlin.run { | ||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isExpressionReferencedBy(questionnaire) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
|
||
questionnaire.item.flattened().forEach { item -> | ||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isEnableWhenReferencedBy(item) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
|
||
isReferenced = questionnaireItem.isExpressionReferencedBy(item) | ||
if (isReferenced) return@run | ||
} | ||
} | ||
if (isReferenced) isLoadingNextPage.value = true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this whole bit should be calculated once for the questionnaire instead of being calculated each time when the answer changes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay
@@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ data class QuestionnaireNavigationUIState( | |||
val navSubmit: QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState = QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState.Hidden, | |||
val navCancel: QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState = QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState.Hidden, | |||
val navReview: QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState = QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState.Hidden, | |||
val navNextProgressBar: QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState = | |||
QuestionnaireNavigationViewUIState.Hidden, | |||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jingtang10 what do you think of this current code?
Initially I did add a new UI state for loading, but changed my mind, then implement it this current way.
My reasoning:
In the future, I'm thinking there might be other types of UI other than button that might use this UI state, it makes sense to have Loading state for button, but might not be for other types of UI.
Or am I just overthinking it(?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Jing:
Use loading state to update both next button and next button's circular progress indicator together
This SDK PRs are included: google/android-fhir#2645 google/android-fhir#2663
…nc-process-for-get-questionnaire-pages
FORK - With unmerged PR #9 - WUP #13 SDK - WUP google#2178 - WUP google#2650 - WUP google#2663 - WUP google#2689 - WUP google#2645
FORK - With unmerged PR #9 - WUP #13 SDK - WUP google#2178 - WUP google#2650 - WUP google#2663 - WUP google#2645
FORK - With unmerged PR #9 - WUP #13 SDK - WUP google#2178 - WUP google#2650 - WUP google#2663 - WUP google#2645 - WUP google#2715
IMPORTANT: All PRs must be linked to an issue (except for extremely trivial and straightforward changes).
Fixes #2639
Description
Clear and concise code change description.
Alternative(s) considered
Have you considered any alternatives? And if so, why have you chosen the approach in this PR?
Type
Feature
Screenshots (if applicable)
Checklist
./gradlew spotlessApply
and./gradlew spotlessCheck
to check my code follows the style guide of this project../gradlew check
and./gradlew connectedCheck
to test my changes locally.