Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Python manual timing example #1722

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

alxbilger
Copy link
Contributor

According to the user guide, when manual timing, it is necessary to explicit it by using the UseManualTime function. Its equivalent in Python is use_manual_time(). This function was not called in the example.

It is possible to verify that the use of this function has an impact on the measure by adding another time.sleep(0.01) at the end of the iteration. There is a x2 difference depending on whether use_manual_time() is used or not.

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Dec 22, 2023

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

According to the user guide, when manual timing, it is necessary to explicit it by using the `UseManualTime` function. Its equivalent in Python is use_manual_time(). This function was not called in the example.

It is possible to verify that the use of this function has an impact on the measure by adding another `time.sleep(0.01)` at the end of the iteration. There is a x2 difference depending on whether `use_manual_time()` is used or not.
@dmah42 dmah42 merged commit 437fea4 into google:main Aug 16, 2024
80 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants