-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Connecting block to parent in domToBlockHeadless_ #4461
Conversation
6a24f36
to
8be4cca
Compare
8be4cca
to
edd220f
Compare
With the new connection checker being more flexible, I wonder about connection checks that depend on the state of a parent block's fields. Wouldn't this mess with that? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some comments.
I'm nervous about this because of backwards compatibility, but agree that making our parsing more clearly defined is a good move.
edd220f
to
868e252
Compare
1412d45
to
cb2c94f
Compare
d33ffbd
to
ff2e6b8
Compare
Rebased after merging change for parsing tags in explicit order. |
ff2e6b8
to
fc222fd
Compare
I don't think this would be an issue if the connection checker depends on the parent block's fields. However, if the connection depends on the child block's fields, then those wont be loaded yet. Other potential new issue (introduced in #4571):
Other Remaining unsolved issues (not new issues):
|
The basics
The details
Resolves
Fixes #2135
Proposed Changes
Reason for Changes
Test Coverage
Ran tests and tested in advanced playground with the following block:
Documentation
Additional Information
The generator tests were very helpful for testing this change as it caught many edge cases of xml generation.
Depends on #4571