Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library #431
+402
−5
Google Cloud Build / cel-cpp-builder (cel-analysis)
failed
Nov 28, 2023 in 10m 0s
Summary
Build Information
Trigger | cel-cpp-builder |
Build | 0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52 |
Start | 2023-11-28T11:59:58-08:00 |
Duration | 9m13.399s |
Status | FAILURE |
Steps
Step | Status | Duration |
---|---|---|
gcc-9 | CANCELLED | 9m10.262s |
clang-11 | FAILURE | 9m0.26s |
Details
starting build "0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52"
FETCHSOURCE
hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint:
hint: git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint:
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this command:
hint:
hint: git branch -m <name>
Initialized empty Git repository in /workspace/.git/
From https://github.com/google/cel-cpp
* branch ef81f13a8f95a4a5401c29b3794f1c270dd643a6 -> FETCH_HEAD
HEAD is now at ef81f13 Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library
BUILD
Starting Step #1 - "clang-11"
Starting Step #0 - "gcc-9"
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Pulling image: gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": Pulling image: gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": latest: Pulling from cel-analysis/gcc-9
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": latest: Pulling from cel-analysis/gcc-9
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Digest: sha256:0cb9bf73c3c6b17b7f51f3e70d041ccbab7a77162ddc43b25f21a04b3371b43e
Step #1 - "clang-11": Digest: sha256:0cb9bf73c3c6b17b7f51f3e70d041ccbab7a77162ddc43b25f21a04b3371b43e
Step #1 - "clang-11": Status: Downloaded newer image for gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Status: Downloaded newer image for gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #0 - "gcc-9": gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": Extracting Bazel installation...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Extracting Bazel installation...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Step #1 - "clang-11": Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:27) INFO: Current date is 2023-11-28
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:27) Loading:
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:27) INFO: Current date is 2023-11-28
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:27) Loading:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:28) Loading:
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:28) Loading:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading:
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:29) Loading:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading: 0 packages loaded
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:237:6: target '//base:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:243:6: target '//base:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:161:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:196:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) Analyzing: 414 targets (33 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading:
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading:
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading: 0 packages loaded
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:237:6: target '//base:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:243:6: target '//base:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:161:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:196:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:31) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) Analyzing: 414 targets (33 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:32) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:32) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:33) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:34) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:34) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:37) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:38) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:38) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:39) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:42) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:43) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:43) Analyzing: 414 targets (114 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:44) Analyzing: 414 targets (95 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:44) Analyzing: 414 targets (144 packages loaded, 3244 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:45) Analyzing: 414 targets (117 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:45) Analyzing: 414 targets (145 packages loaded, 3671 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:46) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3730 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:46) Analyzing: 414 targets (117 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:47) Analyzing: 414 targets (143 packages loaded, 3225 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:49) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3731 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:50) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3730 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:52) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3731 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:52) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:53) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:10) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:12) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:12) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:25) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:25) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:27) Analyzing: 414 targets (207 packages loaded, 13403 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:27) Analyzing: 414 targets (207 packages loaded, 13402 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:28) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13414 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:28) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13415 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:05) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13414 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:05) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13415 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:06) Analyzing: 414 targets (255 packages loaded, 13451 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:06) Analyzing: 414 targets (255 packages loaded, 13452 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:08) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13898 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:08) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13899 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13898 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13899 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) INFO: Analyzed 414 targets (275 packages loaded, 13957 targets configured).
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) INFO: Found 262 targets and 152 test targets...
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) INFO: Analyzed 414 targets (275 packages loaded, 13958 targets configured).
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) INFO: Found 262 targets and 152 test targets...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) [0 / 253] [Prepa] BazelWorkspaceStatusAction stable-status.txt ... ( 1 action running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) [0 / 267] [Prepa] BazelWorkspaceStatusAction stable-status.txt ... ( 1 action running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:12) [198 / 619] Compiling absl/log/internal/proto.cc; 0s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:12) [103 / 514] Compiling absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc; 1s linux-sandbox ... (31 actions, 30 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:13) [207 / 619] Compiling absl/log/internal/proto.cc; 1s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:13) [108 / 514] Compiling absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc; 2s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:14) [121 / 514] Compiling absl/strings/charconv.cc; 3s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:14) [255 / 633] Compiling common/native_type.cc; 2s linux-sandbox ... (31 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:15) [130 / 514] Compiling absl/strings/internal/str_format/bind.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:15) [287 / 645] Compiling absl/time/duration.cc; 3s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:16) [132 / 514] Compiling base/function_result_set.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:16) [314 / 659] Compiling absl/time/duration.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:17) INFO: From Compiling common/memory.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4 warnings generated.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:17) [137 / 514] Compiling base/function_result_set.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:17) [329 / 662] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:18) [162 / 514] Compiling base/attribute.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (30 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:18) [343 / 663] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:19) [167 / 514] Compiling absl/status/status.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:19) [349 / 663] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 7s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:20) [175 / 514] Compiling internal/strings.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:20) [363 / 667] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 8s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:21) [209 / 514] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 7s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:21) [373 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 9s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:22) [212 / 514] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 8s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:22) [383 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 10s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:23) [221 / 515] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 9s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:24) [385 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 11s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:24) [227 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 10s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:25) [396 / 670] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 12s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:25) [241 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 11s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:26) [415 / 673] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 13s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) INFO: From Compiling base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc: In function 'std::string cel::base_internal::MemoryManagerTestModeToString(cel::base_internal::MemoryManagerTestMode)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc:28:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 28 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) INFO: From Compiling base/values/uint_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from ./base/values/uint_value.h:24,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/uint_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 327 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from base/values/uint_value.cc:35:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./internal/number.h: In function 'constexpr cel::internal::ComparisonResult cel::internal::Invert(cel::internal::ComparisonResult)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./internal/number.h:71:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 71 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) [247 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 12s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/values/timestamp_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from ./base/values/timestamp_value.h:24,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/timestamp_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 327 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:27) [422 / 673] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 14s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/values/null_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from ./base/values/null_value.h:23,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/null_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 327 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/type.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:35:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:36:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:47:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:41:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:47:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory'
...
[Logs truncated due to log size limitations. For full logs, see https://console.cloud.google.com/cloud-build/builds/0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52?project=676743559828.]
...
61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/cel_function_adapter_test.cc:1:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter_impl.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/cel_function_adapter_test.cc:1:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter_impl.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:51:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:22) [3,383 / 3,498] 22 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 81s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:23) [3,391 / 3,499] 23 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 82s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:24) [3,398 / 3,499] 24 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 83s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) INFO: From Compiling eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) [3,411 / 3,500] 24 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 84s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) INFO: From Compiling eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:38:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:39:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:41:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory; \
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:51:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11": friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./eval/public/cel_options.h:32:8: warning: 'enable_heterogeneous_equality' is deprecated: The ability to disable heterogeneous equality is being removed in the near future [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct InterpreterOptions {
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:70:10: note: in implicit move constructor for 'google::api::expr::runtime::InterpreterOptions' first required here
Step #1 - "clang-11": return options;
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./eval/public/cel_options.h:112:3: note: 'enable_heterogeneous_equality' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
Step #1 - "clang-11": ABSL_DEPRECATED(
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": external/com_google_absl/absl/base/attributes.h:683:49: note: expanded from macro 'ABSL_DEPRECATED'
Step #1 - "clang-11": #define ABSL_DEPRECATED(message) __attribute__((deprecated(message)))
Step #1 - "clang-11": ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 10 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:26) [3,438 / 3,522] 25 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 85s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:27) [3,467 / 3,552] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 86s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:28) [2,523 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 85s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:28) [3,484 / 3,568] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 88s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:29) [3,486 / 3,568] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 89s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:30) [3,487 / 3,569] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 90s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:31) [3,497 / 3,575] 27 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 91s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:32) [3,499 / 3,575] 27 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 92s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:33) [3,507 / 3,579] 28 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 93s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:36) [3,512 / 3,583] 28 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 95s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11":
Step #1 - "clang-11": Server terminated abruptly (error code: 14, error message: 'Socket closed', log file: '/bazel/server/jvm.out')
Step #1 - "clang-11":
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:51) [2,524 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 108s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:52) [2,525 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 109s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:54) [2,526 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 111s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:57) [2,527 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 113s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:57) INFO: From Compiling base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:31,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h: In instantiation of 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(const cel::Handle<T>&) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:312:40: required from 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(cel::Handle<cel::Value>) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:309:16: required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:316:5: warning: ignoring returned value of type 'absl::lts_20230802::Status', declared with attribute nodiscard [-Wunused-result]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 316 | Add(value->NativeValue());
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:320:16: note: in call to 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(U) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]', declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 320 | absl::Status Add(U value) {
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": external/com_google_absl/absl/status/status.h:424:7: note: 'absl::lts_20230802::Status' declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 424 | class Status final {
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~~~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:31,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h: In instantiation of 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(const cel::Handle<T>&) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:312:40: required from 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(cel::Handle<cel::Value>) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:309:16: required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:316:5: warning: ignoring returned value of type 'absl::lts_20230802::Status', declared with attribute nodiscard [-Wunused-result]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 316 | Add(value->NativeValue());
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:320:16: note: in call to 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(U) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]', declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 320 | absl::Status Add(U value) {
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9": from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": external/com_google_absl/absl/status/status.h:424:7: note: 'absl::lts_20230802::Status' declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 424 | class Status final {
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^~~~~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:58) [2,533 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 114s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:58) INFO: From Compiling common/types/enum_type_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from common/types/enum_type_test.cc:32:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h: In instantiation of 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::Get(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> = const cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>&]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:313:34: required from 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::HasA(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> = bool]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/casting.h:135:76: required from 'static bool cel::CompositionCastTraits<To, From, <template-parameter-1-3> >::Compatible(absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<U>&) [with To = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; From = const cel::Type&; <template-parameter-1-3> = void; absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<U> = cel::Type]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/internal/casting.h:103:53: required from 'bool cel::common_internal::InstanceOfImpl<To>::operator()(const From&) const [with From = cel::Type; To = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": common/types/enum_type_test.cc:269:3: required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:324:52: warning: returning reference to temporary [-Wreturn-local-addr]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 324 | return Cast<U>(absl::get<Base>(type.variant_));
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:59) [2,537 / 2,575] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 115s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:00) [2,550 / 2,591] 9 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 117s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:00) INFO: From Compiling common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:27:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h: In instantiation of 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::Get(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> = const cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>&]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:313:34: required from 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::HasA(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> = bool]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/casting.h:135:76: required from 'static bool cel::CompositionCastTraits<To, From, <template-parameter-1-3> >::Compatible(absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<From>&) [with To = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; From = const cel::Type&; <template-parameter-1-3> = void; absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<From> = cel::Type]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/internal/casting.h:103:53: required from 'bool cel::common_internal::InstanceOfImpl<To>::operator()(const From&) const [with From = cel::Type; To = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:187:3: required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:324:52: warning: returning reference to temporary [-Wreturn-local-addr]
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 324 | return Cast<U>(absl::get<Base>(type.variant_));
Step #0 - "gcc-9": | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:01) [2,567 / 2,617] 12 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 118s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Finished Step #1 - "clang-11"
ERROR
ERROR: build step 1 "gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest" failed: step exited with non-zero status: 37
Step #0 - "gcc-9":
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Bazel caught terminate signal; shutting down.
Step #0 - "gcc-9":
Loading