Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library #431

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Nov 28, 2023

Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library

ef81f13
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library #431

Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library
ef81f13
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Google Cloud Build / cel-cpp-builder (cel-analysis) failed Nov 28, 2023 in 10m 0s

Summary

Build Information

Trigger cel-cpp-builder
Build 0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52
Start 2023-11-28T11:59:58-08:00
Duration 9m13.399s
Status FAILURE

Steps

Step Status Duration
gcc-9 CANCELLED 9m10.262s
clang-11 FAILURE 9m0.26s

Details

starting build "0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52"

FETCHSOURCE
hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint: 
hint: 	git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint: 
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this command:
hint: 
hint: 	git branch -m <name>
Initialized empty Git repository in /workspace/.git/
From https://github.com/google/cel-cpp
 * branch            ef81f13a8f95a4a5401c29b3794f1c270dd643a6 -> FETCH_HEAD
HEAD is now at ef81f13 Add least and greatest macros for Math extension library
BUILD
Starting Step #1 - "clang-11"
Starting Step #0 - "gcc-9"
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Pulling image: gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": Pulling image: gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": latest: Pulling from cel-analysis/gcc-9
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Pulling fs layer
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Waiting
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": latest: Pulling from cel-analysis/gcc-9
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Pulling fs layer
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Waiting
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 918547b94326: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 918547b94326: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 5d79063a01c5: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 5d79063a01c5: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Download complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Verifying Checksum
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Verifying Checksum
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Download complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 4eedd9c5abf7: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 9cdadd40055f: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9cdadd40055f: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7dcff776ce99: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7dcff776ce99: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": c7be990883e3: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": c7be990883e3: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 15fdd707ac75: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 15fdd707ac75: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 7562328e5f2d: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 7562328e5f2d: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 8089ef4edf6a: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 8089ef4edf6a: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 60b531569584: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 60b531569584: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 32b81866a450: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 32b81866a450: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 471cb6c424bc: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 471cb6c424bc: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": e817f1f7cf0b: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": e817f1f7cf0b: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": 93067cd3ab32: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 93067cd3ab32: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": cad380d53159: Pull complete
Step #1 - "clang-11": cad380d53159: Pull complete
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Digest: sha256:0cb9bf73c3c6b17b7f51f3e70d041ccbab7a77162ddc43b25f21a04b3371b43e
Step #1 - "clang-11": Digest: sha256:0cb9bf73c3c6b17b7f51f3e70d041ccbab7a77162ddc43b25f21a04b3371b43e
Step #1 - "clang-11": Status: Downloaded newer image for gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Status: Downloaded newer image for gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #0 - "gcc-9": gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest
Step #1 - "clang-11": Extracting Bazel installation...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Extracting Bazel installation...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Step #1 - "clang-11": Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:27) INFO: Current date is 2023-11-28
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:27) Loading: 
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:27) INFO: Current date is 2023-11-28
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:27) Loading: 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:28) Loading: 
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:28) Loading: 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading: 
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:29) Loading: 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading: 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:29) Loading: 0 packages loaded
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:237:6: target '//base:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:243:6: target '//base:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:161:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:196:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:30) Analyzing: 414 targets (33 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading: 
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading: 
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:30) Loading: 0 packages loaded
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:237:6: target '//base:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/base/BUILD:243:6: target '//base:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:161:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:type' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) WARNING: /workspace/extensions/protobuf/BUILD:196:6: target '//extensions/protobuf:value' is deprecated: Use :data instead.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:31) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:31) Analyzing: 414 targets (33 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:32) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:32) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:33) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:34) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:34) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:37) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:38) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:38) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:39) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:42) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:43) Analyzing: 414 targets (74 packages loaded, 71 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:43) Analyzing: 414 targets (114 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:44) Analyzing: 414 targets (95 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:44) Analyzing: 414 targets (144 packages loaded, 3244 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:45) Analyzing: 414 targets (117 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:45) Analyzing: 414 targets (145 packages loaded, 3671 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:46) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3730 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:46) Analyzing: 414 targets (117 packages loaded, 594 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:47) Analyzing: 414 targets (143 packages loaded, 3225 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:49) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3731 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:50) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3730 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:52) Analyzing: 414 targets (150 packages loaded, 3731 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:00:52) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:00:53) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:10) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:12) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:12) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:25) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3918 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:25) Analyzing: 414 targets (151 packages loaded, 3917 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:27) Analyzing: 414 targets (207 packages loaded, 13403 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:27) Analyzing: 414 targets (207 packages loaded, 13402 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:01:28) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13414 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:01:28) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13415 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:05) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13414 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:05) Analyzing: 414 targets (208 packages loaded, 13415 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:06) Analyzing: 414 targets (255 packages loaded, 13451 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:06) Analyzing: 414 targets (255 packages loaded, 13452 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:08) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13898 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:08) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13899 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13898 targets configured)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) Analyzing: 414 targets (271 packages loaded, 13899 targets configured)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) INFO: Analyzed 414 targets (275 packages loaded, 13957 targets configured).
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) INFO: Found 262 targets and 152 test targets...
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) INFO: Analyzed 414 targets (275 packages loaded, 13958 targets configured).
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) INFO: Found 262 targets and 152 test targets...
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:11) [0 / 253] [Prepa] BazelWorkspaceStatusAction stable-status.txt ... ( 1 action running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:11) [0 / 267] [Prepa] BazelWorkspaceStatusAction stable-status.txt ... ( 1 action running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:12) [198 / 619] Compiling absl/log/internal/proto.cc; 0s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:12) [103 / 514] Compiling absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc; 1s linux-sandbox ... (31 actions, 30 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:13) [207 / 619] Compiling absl/log/internal/proto.cc; 1s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:13) [108 / 514] Compiling absl/base/internal/sysinfo.cc; 2s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:14) [121 / 514] Compiling absl/strings/charconv.cc; 3s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:14) [255 / 633] Compiling common/native_type.cc; 2s linux-sandbox ... (31 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:15) [130 / 514] Compiling absl/strings/internal/str_format/bind.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:15) [287 / 645] Compiling absl/time/duration.cc; 3s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:16) [132 / 514] Compiling base/function_result_set.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:16) [314 / 659] Compiling absl/time/duration.cc; 4s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:17) INFO: From Compiling common/memory.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from common/memory.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4 warnings generated.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:17) [137 / 514] Compiling base/function_result_set.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:17) [329 / 662] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:18) [162 / 514] Compiling base/attribute.cc; 5s linux-sandbox ... (30 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:18) [343 / 663] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:19) [167 / 514] Compiling absl/status/status.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:19) [349 / 663] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 7s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:20) [175 / 514] Compiling internal/strings.cc; 6s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:20) [363 / 667] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 8s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:21) [209 / 514] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 7s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:21) [373 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 9s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:22) [212 / 514] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 8s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:22) [383 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 10s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:23) [221 / 515] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 9s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:24) [385 / 668] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 11s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:24) [227 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 10s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:25) [396 / 670] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 12s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:25) [241 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 11s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:26) [415 / 673] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 13s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) INFO: From Compiling base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc: In function 'std::string cel::base_internal::MemoryManagerTestModeToString(cel::base_internal::MemoryManagerTestMode)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": base/internal/memory_manager_testing.cc:28:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":    28 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) INFO: From Compiling base/values/uint_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from ./base/values/uint_value.h:24,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/uint_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   327 |   }
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |   ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from base/values/uint_value.cc:35:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./internal/number.h: In function 'constexpr cel::internal::ComparisonResult cel::internal::Invert(cel::internal::ComparisonResult)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./internal/number.h:71:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":    71 | }
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       | ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:26) [247 / 516] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 12s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/values/timestamp_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from ./base/values/timestamp_value.h:24,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/timestamp_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   327 |   }
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:27) [422 / 673] Compiling base/ast_internal/expr.cc; 14s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/values/null_value.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/handle.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from ./base/values/null_value.h:23,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/null_value.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h: In static member function 'static bool cel::base_internal::Metadata::IsDestructorSkippable(const cel::base_internal::Data&)':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/internal/data.h:327:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   327 |   }
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:03:27) INFO: From Compiling base/type.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:35:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:36:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:47:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:41:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from base/type.cc:47:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory'
...
[Logs truncated due to log size limitations. For full logs, see https://console.cloud.google.com/cloud-build/builds/0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52?project=676743559828.]
...
61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/cel_function_adapter_test.cc:1:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter_impl.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11":          struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/cel_function_adapter_test.cc:1:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_adapter_impl.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function.h:12:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:51:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11":          struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": 9 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:22) [3,383 / 3,498] 22 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 81s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:23) [3,391 / 3,499] 23 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 82s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:24) [3,398 / 3,499] 24 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 83s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) INFO: From Compiling eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.cc:15:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/structs/cel_proto_lite_wrap_util.h:31:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_value.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/memory.h:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 4 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) [3,411 / 3,500] 24 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 84s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:25) INFO: From Compiling eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:610:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:754:10: warning: class 'NativeTypeTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class NativeTypeTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/native_type.h:46:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct NativeTypeTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:755:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManager>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/handle.h:28:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/memory.h:939:10: warning: class 'CompositionTraits' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class CompositionTraits<MemoryManagerRef>;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./common/casting.h:69:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct CompositionTraits;
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:38:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/list_type.h:128:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:39:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/map_type.h:138:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:37:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_manager.h:25:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/type_factory.h:41:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/types/optional_type.h:61:3: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE() {
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/memory.h:153:10: note: expanded from macro 'CEL_INTERNAL_IS_DESTRUCTOR_SKIPPABLE'
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;             \
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:42:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/bytes_value.h:238:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11":          struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:16:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/function.h:22:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./base/value_factory.h:51:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: warning: class template 'HandleFactory' was previously declared as a struct template; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/handle.h:282:8: note: previous use is here
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct HandleFactory {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./base/values/string_value.h:247:10: note: did you mean struct here?
Step #1 - "clang-11":   friend class ::cel::base_internal::HandleFactory;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^~~~~
Step #1 - "clang-11":          struct
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:26:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/builtin_func_registrar.h:19:
Step #1 - "clang-11": In file included from ./eval/public/cel_function_registry.h:20:
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./eval/public/cel_options.h:32:8: warning: 'enable_heterogeneous_equality' is deprecated: The ability to disable heterogeneous equality is being removed in the near future [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
Step #1 - "clang-11": struct InterpreterOptions {
Step #1 - "clang-11":        ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": eval/tests/expression_builder_benchmark_test.cc:70:10: note: in implicit move constructor for 'google::api::expr::runtime::InterpreterOptions' first required here
Step #1 - "clang-11":   return options;
Step #1 - "clang-11":          ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": ./eval/public/cel_options.h:112:3: note: 'enable_heterogeneous_equality' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ABSL_DEPRECATED(
Step #1 - "clang-11":   ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": external/com_google_absl/absl/base/attributes.h:683:49: note: expanded from macro 'ABSL_DEPRECATED'
Step #1 - "clang-11": #define ABSL_DEPRECATED(message) __attribute__((deprecated(message)))
Step #1 - "clang-11":                                                 ^
Step #1 - "clang-11": 10 warnings generated.
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:26) [3,438 / 3,522] 25 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 85s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:27) [3,467 / 3,552] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 86s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:28) [2,523 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 85s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:28) [3,484 / 3,568] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 88s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:29) [3,486 / 3,568] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 89s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:30) [3,487 / 3,569] 26 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 90s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:31) [3,497 / 3,575] 27 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 91s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:32) [3,499 / 3,575] 27 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 92s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:33) [3,507 / 3,579] 28 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 93s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": (20:08:36) [3,512 / 3,583] 28 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto2/test_all_types.pb.cc; 95s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #1 - "clang-11": 
Step #1 - "clang-11": Server terminated abruptly (error code: 14, error message: 'Socket closed', log file: '/bazel/server/jvm.out')
Step #1 - "clang-11": 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:51) [2,524 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 108s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:52) [2,525 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 109s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:54) [2,526 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 111s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:57) [2,527 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 113s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:57) INFO: From Compiling base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:31,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h: In instantiation of 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(const cel::Handle<T>&) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:312:40:   required from 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(cel::Handle<cel::Value>) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:309:16:   required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:316:5: warning: ignoring returned value of type 'absl::lts_20230802::Status', declared with attribute nodiscard [-Wunused-result]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   316 |     Add(value->NativeValue());
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |     ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:320:16: note: in call to 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(U) [with T = cel::IntValue; U = long int]', declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   320 |   absl::Status Add(U value) {
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |                ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": external/com_google_absl/absl/status/status.h:424:7: note: 'absl::lts_20230802::Status' declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   424 | class Status final {
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |       ^~~~~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:31,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h: In instantiation of 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(const cel::Handle<T>&) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:312:40:   required from 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(cel::Handle<cel::Value>) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:309:16:   required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:316:5: warning: ignoring returned value of type 'absl::lts_20230802::Status', declared with attribute nodiscard [-Wunused-result]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   316 |     Add(value->NativeValue());
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |     ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./base/values/list_value_builder.h:320:16: note: in call to 'absl::lts_20230802::Status cel::base_internal::ListValueBuilderImpl<T, U>::Add(U) [with T = cel::UintValue; U = long unsigned int]', declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   320 |   absl::Status Add(U value) {
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |                ^~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from ./base/values/map_value_builder.h:26,
Step #0 - "gcc-9":                  from base/values/map_value_builder_test.cc:15:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": external/com_google_absl/absl/status/status.h:424:7: note: 'absl::lts_20230802::Status' declared here
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   424 | class Status final {
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |       ^~~~~~
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:58) [2,533 / 2,574] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 114s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:58) INFO: From Compiling common/types/enum_type_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from common/types/enum_type_test.cc:32:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h: In instantiation of 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::Get(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> = const cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>&]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:313:34:   required from 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::HasA(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> = bool]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/casting.h:135:76:   required from 'static bool cel::CompositionCastTraits<To, From, <template-parameter-1-3> >::Compatible(absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<U>&) [with To = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>; From = const cel::Type&; <template-parameter-1-3> = void; absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<U> = cel::Type]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/internal/casting.h:103:53:   required from 'bool cel::common_internal::InstanceOfImpl<To>::operator()(const From&) const [with From = cel::Type; To = cel::EnumTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomEnumTypeInterface>]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": common/types/enum_type_test.cc:269:3:   required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:324:52: warning: returning reference to temporary [-Wreturn-local-addr]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   324 |       return Cast<U>(absl::get<Base>(type.variant_));
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |                                                    ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:08:59) [2,537 / 2,575] 5 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 115s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:00) [2,550 / 2,591] 9 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 117s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions running)
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:00) INFO: From Compiling common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": In file included from common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:27:
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h: In instantiation of 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::Get(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, const U&> = const cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>&]':
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:313:34:   required from 'static std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> cel::CompositionTraits<cel::Type>::HasA(const cel::Type&) [with U = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; std::enable_if_t<IsTypeAlternativeV<U>, bool> = bool]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/casting.h:135:76:   required from 'static bool cel::CompositionCastTraits<To, From, <template-parameter-1-3> >::Compatible(absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<From>&) [with To = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>; From = const cel::Type&; <template-parameter-1-3> = void; absl::lts_20230802::remove_cvref_t<From> = cel::Type]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/internal/casting.h:103:53:   required from 'bool cel::common_internal::InstanceOfImpl<To>::operator()(const From&) const [with From = cel::Type; To = cel::OpaqueTypeFor<cel::{anonymous}::CustomTypeInterface>]'
Step #0 - "gcc-9": common/types/opaque_type_test.cc:187:3:   required from here
Step #0 - "gcc-9": ./common/type.h:324:52: warning: returning reference to temporary [-Wreturn-local-addr]
Step #0 - "gcc-9":   324 |       return Cast<U>(absl::get<Base>(type.variant_));
Step #0 - "gcc-9":       |                                                    ^
Step #0 - "gcc-9": (20:09:01) [2,567 / 2,617] 12 / 152 tests; Compiling external/com_google_cel_spec/proto/test/v1/proto3/test_all_types.pb.cc; 118s linux-sandbox ... (32 actions, 31 running)
Finished Step #1 - "clang-11"
ERROR
ERROR: build step 1 "gcr.io/cel-analysis/gcc-9:latest" failed: step exited with non-zero status: 37
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 
Step #0 - "gcc-9": Bazel caught terminate signal; shutting down.
Step #0 - "gcc-9": 

Build Log: https://console.cloud.google.com/cloud-build/builds/0fd1a0ee-67d3-429b-81ba-42bcfe7b6f52?project=676743559828