Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump google.golang.org/genproto #714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

@liggitt liggitt commented May 26, 2023

This picks up a version of genproto that separates api and rpc packages into submodules, to enable dropping transitive dependencies on cloud API packages in the future for uses of those generic packages.

See googleapis/go-genproto#1015 for details on the timeline for completing the submodule isolation.

cc @jpbetz @cici37 @TristonianJones

@jnthntatum
Copy link
Collaborator

/gcbrun

@cici37
Copy link
Collaborator

cici37 commented May 26, 2023

/lgtm
Thank you!

This picks up a version of genproto that separates api and rpc packages into submodules,
to enable dropping transitive dependencies on cloud API packages in the future
for uses of those generic packages.
@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

liggitt commented May 26, 2023

Updated, didn't realize this repo vendored

Copy link
Collaborator

@jpbetz jpbetz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

The genproto bump is for the correct hash, I'm trusting go mod for the rest.

@jpbetz
Copy link
Collaborator

jpbetz commented May 26, 2023

/gcbrun

@TristonianJones
Copy link
Collaborator

@liggitt I'll follow up this PR with one to update bazel BUILD files to do the same. Thanks!

@TristonianJones TristonianJones merged commit fb3273c into google:master May 26, 2023
@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

liggitt commented May 26, 2023

@liggitt I'll follow up this PR with one to update bazel BUILD files to do the same. Thanks!

ah, thanks, didn't realize those needed a separate update

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants