Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable static module linking for Java 1.8 #33

Closed
nmittler opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Enable static module linking for Java 1.8 #33

nmittler opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nmittler
Copy link
Contributor

We can copy this solution from @carl-mastrangelo

@nmittler nmittler added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jan 12, 2017
@nmittler nmittler self-assigned this Jan 12, 2017
@carl-mastrangelo
Copy link

+1 but beware, shading complicates this.

nmittler added a commit to nmittler/conscrypt that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2017
I'm not really sure of an easy way to test this ATM, since the library would have to be statically linked with the JVM. I think for now, we should just get this in and cross the testing bridge when we get there.

Fixes google#33
nmittler added a commit to nmittler/conscrypt that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2017
I'm not really sure of an easy way to test this ATM, since the library would have to be statically linked with the JVM. I think for now, we should just get this in and cross the testing bridge when we get there.

Fixes google#33
nmittler added a commit to nmittler/conscrypt that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2017
I'm not really sure of an easy way to test this ATM, since the library would have to be statically linked with the JVM. I think for now, we should just get this in and cross the testing bridge when we get there.

Fixes google#33
nmittler pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2017
* Adding support for Java 8 static linking.

I'm not really sure of an easy way to test this ATM, since the library would have to be statically linked with the JVM. I think for now, we should just get this in and cross the testing bridge when we get there.

Fixes #33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants