Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed rng guide outputs #3685

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

fixed rng guide outputs #3685

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

chiamp
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiamp chiamp commented Feb 8, 2024

Fixed rng guide output discrepancies.

For example, this was one of the outputs in the current RNG guide:
image

These are the updated outputs in this PR:
image

@chiamp chiamp self-assigned this Feb 8, 2024
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (598958e) 56.13% compared to head (1e712cb) 56.13%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3685   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.13%   56.13%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       12220    12220           
=======================================
  Hits         6860     6860           
  Misses       5360     5360           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chiamp chiamp requested a review from cgarciae February 8, 2024 00:55
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 37fe9c9 into google:main Feb 9, 2024
19 checks passed
@chiamp chiamp deleted the rng_guide branch March 16, 2024 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants