Gayathri: Version 1.000 added #2573
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
graphicore
commented
Jul 23, 2020
graphicore
commented
- Gayathri Version 1.000 taken from the upstream repo https://github.com/smc/Gayathri.git at commit smc/Gayathri@ae7a4ea.
Fontbakery reportFontbakery version: 0.7.29 [1] Family checks⚠ WARN: Is the command `ftxvalidator` (Apple Font Tool Suite) available?--- Rationale --- There's no reasonable (and legal) way to run the command `ftxvalidator` of the Apple Font Tool Suite on a non-macOS machine. I.e. on GNU+Linux or Windows etc. If Font Bakery is not running on an OSX machine, the machine running Font Bakery could access `ftxvalidator` on OSX, e.g. via ssh or a remote procedure call (rpc). There's an ssh example implementation at: https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/blob/master/prebuilt/workarounds /ftxvalidator/ssh-implementation/ftxvalidator
[8] Gayathri-Bold.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts?
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: ZWNJ Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
[8] Gayathri-Regular.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts?
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: ZWNJ Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
[8] Gayathri-Thin.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: Version number has increased since previous release on Google Fonts?
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: ZWNJ Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
Summary
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
Diff images: qa.zip |
|
CAUTION same disclaimer as in Manjari PR#2572 I used a |
RosaWagner
added
the
-- Needs Upstream Resolution
|
This project is already included in GF with the same version that the current source file has: 1.000 |
* Gayathri Version 1.110 taken from the upstream repo https://gitlab.com/smc/fonts/gayathri.git at commit 74544b1d2e6619a872710be05fde7bc309e3e162.
|
Updated Gayathri: Version 1.110 addedd7f0441: [gftools-packager] Gayathri: Version 1.110 added
e059325: [gftools-packager] ofl/gayathri remove METADATA "source". #2587 |
vv-monsalve
force-pushed
the
gftools_packager_ofl_gayathri
branch
from
483a29b to
e059325
Compare
|
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
@googlebot I consent |
Fontbakery reportFontbakery version: 0.7.33 [1] Family checks⚠ WARN: Is the command `ftxvalidator` (Apple Font Tool Suite) available?--- Rationale --- There's no reasonable (and legal) way to run the command `ftxvalidator` of the Apple Font Tool Suite on a non-macOS machine. I.e. on GNU+Linux or Windows etc. If Font Bakery is not running on an OSX machine, the machine running Font Bakery could access `ftxvalidator` on OSX, e.g. via ssh or a remote procedure call (rpc). There's an ssh example implementation at: https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/blob/master/prebuilt/workarounds /ftxvalidator/ssh-implementation/ftxvalidator
[12] Gayathri-Bold.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designer is listed with the correct name on the Google Fonts catalog of designers?
🔥 FAIL: Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components.--- Rationale --- ve been bugs rendering variable fonts with nested components. Additionally, some static fonts with nested components have been reported to have rendering and printing issues. (See googlefonts/fontbakery#2961 and arrowtype/recursive#412.)
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
⚠ WARN: Do any segments have colinear vectors?
--- Rationale --- This test looks for consecutive line segments which have the same angle. This normally happens if an outline point has been added by accident. This test is not run for variable fonts, as they may legitimately have colinear vectors.
⚠ WARN: Do outlines contain any jaggy segments?
--- Rationale --- This test heuristically detects outline segments which form a particularly small angle, indicative of an outline error. This may cause false positives in cases such as extreme ink traps, so should be regarded as advisory and backed up by manual inspection.
⚠ WARN: Do outlines contain any semi-vertical or semi-horizontal lines?
--- Rationale --- This test detects line segments which are nearly, but not quite, exactly horizontal or vertical. Sometimes such lines are created by design, but often they are indicative of a design error. This test is disabled for italic styles, which often contain nearly-upright lines.
[10] Gayathri-Regular.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designer is listed with the correct name on the Google Fonts catalog of designers?
🔥 FAIL: Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components.--- Rationale --- ve been bugs rendering variable fonts with nested components. Additionally, some static fonts with nested components have been reported to have rendering and printing issues. (See googlefonts/fontbakery#2961 and arrowtype/recursive#412.)
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
⚠ WARN: Do outlines contain any semi-vertical or semi-horizontal lines?
--- Rationale --- This test detects line segments which are nearly, but not quite, exactly horizontal or vertical. Sometimes such lines are created by design, but often they are indicative of a design error. This test is disabled for italic styles, which often contain nearly-upright lines.
[12] Gayathri-Thin.ttf🔥 FAIL: Check `Google Fonts Latin Core` glyph coverage.--- Rationale --- Google Fonts expects that fonts in its collection support at least the minimal set of characters defined in the `GF-latin-core` glyph-set.
🔥 FAIL: METADATA.pb: Designer is listed with the correct name on the Google Fonts catalog of designers?
🔥 FAIL: Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components.--- Rationale --- ve been bugs rendering variable fonts with nested components. Additionally, some static fonts with nested components have been reported to have rendering and printing issues. (See googlefonts/fontbakery#2961 and arrowtype/recursive#412.)
⚠ WARN: Check copyright namerecords match license file.--- Rationale --- A known licensing description must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table. The source of truth for this check (to determine which license is in use) is a file placed side-by-side to your font project including the licensing terms. Depending on the chosen license, one of the following string snippets is expected to be found on the NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION) entries of the name table: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: License URL matches License text on name table?--- Rationale --- A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry of the name table. The source of truth for this check is the licensing text found on the NameID 13 entry (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). The string snippets used for detecting licensing terms are: - "This Font Software is licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1. This license is available with a FAQ at: https://scripts.sil.org/OFL" - "Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0" - "Licensed under the Ubuntu Font Licence 1.0." Currently accepted licenses are Apache or Open Font License. For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License may be acceptable as well. When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects.
⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.--- Rationale --- Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3 contours, depending on whether its double story or single story. However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a display family. This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 0 Expected: 1 ⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class should be non-spacing. Spacing glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class may have incorrect anchor positioning that was only intended for building composite glyphs during design.
⚠ WARN: Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class--- Rationale --- Mark characters should be in the GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠ WARN: Check GDEF mark glyph class doesn't have characters that are not marks)--- Rationale --- Glyphs in the GDEF mark glyph class become non-spacing and may be repositioned if they have mark anchors. Only combining mark glyphs should be in that class. Any non-mark glyph must not be in that class, in particular spacing glyphs.
⚠ WARN: Do any segments have colinear vectors?
--- Rationale --- This test looks for consecutive line segments which have the same angle. This normally happens if an outline point has been added by accident. This test is not run for variable fonts, as they may legitimately have colinear vectors.
⚠ WARN: Do outlines contain any jaggy segments?
--- Rationale --- This test heuristically detects outline segments which form a particularly small angle, indicative of an outline error. This may cause false positives in cases such as extreme ink traps, so should be regarded as advisory and backed up by manual inspection.
⚠ WARN: Do outlines contain any semi-vertical or semi-horizontal lines?
--- Rationale --- This test detects line segments which are nearly, but not quite, exactly horizontal or vertical. Sometimes such lines are created by design, but often they are indicative of a design error. This test is disabled for italic styles, which often contain nearly-upright lines.
Summary
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
Diff images: qa.zip |
This was referenced Nov 25, 2020
vv-monsalve
added
-- Needs manager's opinion
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.