Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[infra] .options support for run command #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016
Merged

[infra] .options support for run command #61

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016

Conversation

mikea
Copy link
Contributor

@mikea mikea commented Oct 31, 2016

Initial work for #19.

I'm not happy that I pull python3 package in. I'd like to add this functionality to libfuzzer-runner, but I am not sure I'd like to add python dependency to that image as well. Ideas are appreciated.

Copy link
Collaborator

@oliverchang oliverchang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for implementing this. I was planning to add this functionality via the helper script, which wouldn't require the python dependency in the container.


# Use .options file if any.
fuzzer_name = run_args[0]
options_file = fuzzer_name + ".options"
Copy link
Collaborator

@oliverchang oliverchang Oct 31, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be checking for .options in /out, since the fuzzer binary can be invoked without it's full path name?

@mikea
Copy link
Contributor Author

mikea commented Nov 2, 2016

@oliverchang, how about this version? It is even shorter than python and will work both for script and for container. A bit hacky but I don't see why it won't suit us for a very long time.

@oliverchang
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice, LGTM.

@mikea mikea merged commit e1a2d3c into master Nov 2, 2016
@mikea mikea deleted the run_use_options branch November 3, 2016 16:38
DavidKorczynski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants