More debugging opportunities #834
Comments
|
why can't you start the process under gdb? |
|
Sometimes make check is quite complicated stuff where e.g. a server is launched and then set of tests is done against the server. |
|
I think it would be a nice feature. Sometimes starting under gdb is very
hard or even impossible - imagine a program that needs to inherit a pipe
from some long running process for correct operation.
This option should also apply during asan activation to be useful on
Android.
…On Jul 13, 2017 03:47, "marxin" ***@***.***> wrote:
Sometimes make check is quite complicated stuff where e.g. a server is
launched and then set of tests is done against the server.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#834 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZuSmFSnZhks-igew-FCfb9sS7ugOa8ks5sNfXWgaJpZM4OVNhT>
.
|
|
I've just done a review request: |
dtzWill
pushed a commit
to llvm-mirror/compiler-rt
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2017
Summary: As mentioned in google/sanitizers#834, suggested option can be handy for debugging. Reviewers: kcc Reviewed By: kcc Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35409 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk@309854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
Done. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Similar to #31 I would like to introduce sleep_after_init which is a good place to attach gdb to process that can eventually trigger a sanitizer issue. I know one can add sleep to a source base, but debugging complex scenario can be easier with that.
Will it be accepted by community?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: