Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update node.js to v22 #5776

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Oct 29, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
node major 21 -> 22 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) devDependencies major ^20.4.5 -> ^22.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) devDependencies major ^20.12.12 -> ^22.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) devDependencies major ^20.0.0 -> ^22.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
@types/node (source) devDependencies major ^20.4.9 -> ^22.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

nodejs/node (node)

v22.12.0

Compare Source

v22.11.0: 2024-10-29, Version 22.11.0 'Jod' (LTS), @​richardlau

Compare Source

Notable Changes

This release marks the transition of Node.js 22.x into Long Term Support (LTS)
with the codename 'Jod'. The 22.x release line now moves into "Active LTS"
and will remain so until October 2025. After that time, it will move into
"Maintenance" until end of life in April 2027.

Other than updating metadata, such as the process.release object, to reflect
that the release is LTS, no further changes from Node.js 22.10.0 are included.

OpenSSL 3.x

Official binaries for Node.js 22.x currently include OpenSSL 3.0.x (more
specifically, the quictls OpenSSL fork).
OpenSSL 3.0.x is the currently designated long term support version that is
scheduled to be supported until 7th September 2026, which is within the expected
lifetime of Node.js 22.x. We are expecting upstream OpenSSL to announce a
successor long term support version prior to that date and since OpenSSL now
follows a semantic versioning-like versioning scheme we expect to be able to
update to the next long term supported version of OpenSSL during the lifetime of
Node.js 22.x.

v22.10.0: 2024-10-16, Version 22.10.0 (Current), @​aduh95

Compare Source

Notable Changes
New "module-sync" exports condition

This release introduces a "module-sync" exports condition that's enabled when
require(esm) is enabled, so packages can supply a synchronous ES module to the
Node.js module loader, no matter if it's being required or imported. This is
similar to the "module" condition that bundlers have been using to support
require(esm) in Node.js, and allows dual-package authors to opt into ESM-first
only on newer versions of Node.js that supports require(esm) to avoid the
dual-package hazard.

{
  "type": "module",
  "exports": {
    "node": {
      // On new version of Node.js, both require() and import get
      // the ESM version
      "module-sync": "./index.js",
      // On older version of Node.js, where "module-sync" and require(esm) are
      // not supported, use the CJS version to avoid dual-package hazard.
      // When package authors think it's time to drop support for older versions of
      // Node.js, they can remove the exports conditions and just use "main": "index.js".
      "default": "./dist/index.cjs"
    },
    // On any other environment, use the ESM version.
    "default": "./index.js"
  }
}

Or if the package is only meant to be run on Node.js and wants to fallback to
CJS on older versions that don't have require(esm):

{
  "type": "module",
  "exports": {
    // On new version of Node.js, both require() and import get the ESM version
    "module-sync": "./index.js",
    // On older version of Node.js, where "module-sync" and require(esm) are
    // not supported, use the CJS version to avoid dual-package hazard.
    // When package authors think it's time to drop support for older versions of
    // Node.js, they can remove the exports conditions and just use "main": "index.js".
    "default": "./dist/index.cjs"
  }
}

For package authors: this only serves as a feature-detection mechanism for
packages that wish to support both CJS and ESM users during the period when some
active Node.js LTS versions support require(esm) while some older ones don't.
When all active Node.js LTS lines support require(esm), packages can simplify
their distributions by bumping the major version, dropping their CJS exports,
and removing the module-sync exports condition (with only main or default
targetting the ESM exports). If the package needs to support both bundlers and
being run unbundled on Node.js during the transition period, use both
module-sync and module and point them to the same ESM file. If the package
already doesn't want to support older versions of Node.js that doesn't support
require(esm), don't use this export condition.

For bundlers/tools: they should avoid implementing this stop-gap condition.
Most existing bundlers implement the de-facto bundler standard
module
exports condition, and that should be enough to support users who want to bundle
ESM from CJS consumers. Users who want both bundlers and Node.js to recognize
the ESM exports can use both module/module-sync conditions during the
transition period, and can drop module-sync+module when they no longer need
to support older versions of Node.js. If tools do want to support this
condition, it's recommended to make the resolution rules in the graph pointed by
this condition match the Node.js native ESM rules to avoid divergence.

We ended up implementing a condition with a different name instead of reusing
"module", because existing code in the ecosystem using the "module"
condition sometimes also expect the module resolution for these ESM files to
work in CJS style, which is supported by bundlers, but the native Node.js loader
has intentionally made ESM resolution different from CJS resolution (e.g.
forbidding import './noext' or import './directory'), so it would be
breaking to implement a "module" condition without implementing the forbidden
ESM resolution rules. For now, this just implements a new condition as
semver-minor so it can be backported to older LTS.

Contributed by Joyee Cheung in #​54648.

node --run is now stable

This CLI flag runs a specified command from a package.json's "scripts" object.

For the following package.json:

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "node --test-reporter junit --test ./test"
  }
}

You can run node --run test and that would start the test suite.

Contributed by Yagiz Nizipli in #​53763.

Other notable changes
  • [f0b441230a] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: add KeyObject.prototype.toCryptoKey (Filip Skokan) #​55262
  • [349d2ed07b] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: add Date fields for validTo and validFrom (Andrew Moon) #​54159
  • [bebc95ed58] - doc: add abmusse to collaborators (Abdirahim Musse) #​55086
  • [914db60159] - (SEMVER-MINOR) http2: expose nghttp2_option_set_stream_reset_rate_limit as an option (Maël Nison) #​54875
  • [f7c3b03759] - (SEMVER-MINOR) lib: propagate aborted state to dependent signals before firing events (jazelly) #​54826
  • [32261fc98a] - (SEMVER-MINOR) module: support loading entrypoint as url (RedYetiDev) #​54933
  • [06957ff355] - (SEMVER-MINOR) module: implement flushCompileCache() (Joyee Cheung) #​54971
  • [2dcf70c347] - (SEMVER-MINOR) module: throw when invalid argument is passed to enableCompileCache() (Joyee Cheung) #​54971
  • [f9b19d7c44] - (SEMVER-MINOR) module: write compile cache to temporary file and then rename it (Joyee Cheung) #​54971
  • [e95163b170] - (SEMVER-MINOR) process: add process.features.require_module (Joyee Cheung) #​55241
  • [4050f68e5d] - (SEMVER-MINOR) process: add process.features.typescript (Aviv Keller) #​54295
  • [86f7cb802d] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: support custom arguments in run() (Aviv Keller) #​55126
  • [b62f2f8259] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: add 'test:summary' event (Colin Ihrig) #​54851
  • [d7c708aec5] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: add support for coverage via run() (Chemi Atlow) #​53937
  • [5fda4a1498] - (SEMVER-MINOR) worker: add markAsUncloneable api (Jason Zhang) #​55234
Commits

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 9am and before 3pm" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot requested review from yoshi-approver and a team as code owners October 29, 2024 09:03
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 29, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 29, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 30, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 31, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Oct 31, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 13, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 13, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 6, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 6, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 9, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 9, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 10, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 11, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 11, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 11, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 12, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 17, 2024

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 18, 2024

/gcbrun

Unverified

The email in this signature doesn’t match the committer email.
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 18, 2024

/gcbrun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants