Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding new Travis key. #2292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Sep 9, 2016

PR #2288 broke the Travis build since the key stored (from 2014) didn't have the project ID as a value.

Also adding better instructing about the encrypted file.

PR googleapis#2288 broke the Travis build since the key stored (from 2014)
didn't have the project ID as a value.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 9, 2016
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Sep 9, 2016

I've also deleted the old and no longer used file encryption env. vars:

  • encrypted_a1b222e8c14d_key
  • encrypted_a1b222e8c14d_iv
  • encrypted_d4f2fba7a94f_key
  • encrypted_d4f2fba7a94f_iv

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Sep 9, 2016

Merging now to stop the permanent state of b0rken-ness. @tseaver and @daspecster please LMK if the "emergency" merge was problematic.

@dhermes dhermes merged commit 49b3f1b into googleapis:master Sep 9, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the add-new-travis-key branch September 9, 2016 23:06
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Sep 9, 2016

Was ready to say "Yay we're green!" but then:
https://travis-ci.org/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-python/builds/158880190

It's just #2080.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Sep 10, 2016

We could merge #2248 to make that one go away. ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants